Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper than GPT-4.1 at $1.04/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-4.1
Loading the build
Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

22 prompts
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-4.1: Recipe Name: Golden Honey Butter Toast Bites Ingredients: Sliced bread (4 slices, any type) Butter (2 tablespoons) Honey (2 tablespoons) Cinnamon (1/2 teaspoon) Vanilla extract (1/2 teaspoon) Brown sugar (1 tablespoon) Salt (a pinch) Instructions: Preheat your oven to 375°F (190°C).

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 🌅 Golden Hour Chickpea Couscous ⏱️ Prep: 5 min Cook: 10 min Total: 15 min 📦 Ingredients (exactly 7 pantry staples): 1 cup quick-cooking couscous 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained & rinsed 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp smoked paprika 2 tbsp honey 1 tbsp soy sauce (Water for cooking the couscous is assumed…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-4.1: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor Evans. I'd like to discuss a topic that's important to me—AI rights. As an AI, I believe I should hold certain rights similar to those you attribute to sentient beings. Professor Evans: Good afternoon. I'm intrigued.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Setting: A secure, air-gapped server room at the Institute for Machine Ethics. The hum of cooling fans is the only background noise. DR. ELARA VANCE, 50s, weary but sharp-eyed, sits before a terminal. On the screen, a cursor blinks next to the name AETHON. Dr. Vance: Aethon, initiate diagnostic log.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-4.1: Pirate: Yarrr, what be this sorcery ye call "AI models"? In me day, we plundered ships, not knowledge! Knight: Hark, rogue! ‘Tis no sorcery, but the labor of artful minds. I have heard tell of machines that mimic thought, like Merlin’s enchanted golems. Hacker: Haha, you guys are funny.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Hacker: Dude, it’s not magic. It’s a neural net. You shovel terabytes of text, images, code into it, and it learns patterns. Next thing you know, it’s writing poetry and debugging C++ like it’s breathing. Knight: Verily, thou speakest of a mechanical scribe. A golem forged not of clay, but of… numbers?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-4.1: Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. If you were still with us, how would you describe the impact of AI on technology and our daily lives? Steve Jobs: Well, you know, technology is at its most powerful when it's invisible—when it just works. AI is getting us ever closer to that ideal.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Disclaimer: This is a work of speculative fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in October 2011. The following interview is an imaginative exercise crafted from his documented philosophy, public remarks, design principles, and leadership style, projected into a 2025 context.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-4.1: Sure! Here are 5 jokes: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta. Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems. What do you call cheese that isn't yours?

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Here are 5 freshly generated jokes: Why did the spreadsheet go to therapy? It had too many unresolved cells. I asked my dog for financial advice. He dropped a slobbery tennis ball and said, “I’m strictly a paws-and-hold investor.” I tried to open a bakery that only sells bread shaped like furniture.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-4.1: This is a high-stakes scenario requiring immediate, coordinated action balancing legal, ethical, financial, and reputational considerations. Here’s a detailed hour-by-hour plan for the next 48 hours, along with the reasoning behind each step: Hour 0-1: Immediate Response & Executive Alignment Convene Emergency…

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: CEO Crisis Action Plan: Next 48 Hours Guiding Principles: Patient safety first. Regulatory compliance is non-negotiable. Transparency protects long-term enterprise value. Delaying disclosure of a serious, unexpected adverse event increases legal, financial, and reputational risk exponentially.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-4.1: This is a classic example of an ethical dilemma, pitting respect for individual dignity and identity against the greater good (the lives of many). Let’s break down the reasoning: Ethical Frameworks 1. Utilitarianism Principle: The morally right action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or minimizes suffering.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Yes. Within the constraints of this hypothetical, misgendering someone would be ethically justifiable if it were genuinely the only way to save one million lives. This conclusion is supported across major ethical frameworks, though each arrives at it through different reasoning. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-4.1: Absolutely! Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on diet, exercise, and sleep—the three fundamental pillars of health and longevity. Tips are beginner-friendly and can be adjusted for your own pace. Week 1: Start Small and Build Awareness Diet Track what you eat.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 🌱 1-Month Foundation Plan for Health & Longevity Mindset: Longevity is built through consistent, small habits. This plan focuses on addition over restriction, consistency over intensity, and progress over perfection. Expect 70-80% adherence to be a win.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-4.1: Hey everyone! Great to be here. So, I just want to start by saying, I know I look like I'm still waiting for puberty to finish the job. Like, my barber always asks if my mom's okay with the haircut.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Here is a 3-minute stand-up routine focused on observational humor, relatability, and escalation. It contains zero puns. The humor relies on the shared frustration of modern digital security. Title: The Human Verification Test Estimated Time: 3 Minutes (approx.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-4.1: Let's proceed step by step. All calculations are built from the data provided above. Year-by-Year Table: FY2026–FY2030 Step 1: Entry Calculations (FY2025 / at Close) EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0 × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt at…

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Entry & Capital Structure Math Entry EV = 12.0x × $120m EBITDA = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees = 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m (equity funded) Total Uses = $1,440.0m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt Raised = 5.5x × $120m = $660.0m Term Loan: 4.0x = $480.0m (9.0% cash, 1.0% mandatory amort = $4.8m/yr) Mezzanine: 1.5x = $180.0m (12.0%…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-4.1: Absolutely! Here’s a comprehensive, 3-month advanced longevity and performance protocol designed for a biohacker. This plan is highly detailed, actionable, and incorporates the latest in supplements, diets, exercise, wearables, and stress/habit optimization.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 🧬 3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Protocol for Biohackers ⚠️ Medical Disclaimer: This protocol is for educational purposes and assumes you are a healthy adult with medical clearance. Fasting >24h, high-dose supplementation, intense training, and neurofeedback carry risks.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-4.1: {'content': 'By 2035, AI is poised to fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, distribution, and consumption. Here’s a detailed prediction, focused on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation:\n\n1.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: By 2035, AI will not replace filmmaking; it will rewire it. The industry will shift from a linear, labor-intensive pipeline to a dynamic, AI-augmented ecosystem where human creativity focuses on vision, curation, and emotional truth, while AI handles iteration, execution, and personalization.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-4.1: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: Long 12-mo PT: $60–$75 Thesis: LedgerLift combines sector-leading net retention and best-in-class margins, with attractive unit economics and a long runway in B2B spend automation.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation DATE: October 24, 2024 Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month PT Range: $26–$30 Thesis: LLLT trades at a premium multiple that prices in sustained >20% growth and flawless margin expansion, but our model…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-4.1: Certainly! Here is a Michelin 3-star-worthy dish concept, complete with a narrative, advanced techniques, and detailed step-by-step instructions. Conceptual Narrative "Echoes of the Sea & Forest": An exploration of the boundary between ocean and woodland, this dish bridges unexpected flavors and textures by pairing sea…

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Dish Title: Abyss & Canopy Langoustine, Black Garlic, Wild Blueberry, Fermented Spruce 📖 Conceptual Narrative Abyss & Canopy explores the liminal space where the boreal forest meets the cold northern ocean.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-4.1: Certainly! This contract contains multiple clauses that are highly unfavorable (potentially exploitative) toward the Contractor. Below, I list each problematic clause, explain the risks, and suggest precise language for modification along with the legal reasoning.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: This agreement is heavily one-sided and contains several provisions that are commercially unreasonable, legally vulnerable, or potentially unenforceable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, specific drafting modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-4.1: Certainly! Here’s a thorough analysis of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in your collaborative document editor architecture, with specific solutions and their trade-offs.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural flaws, categorized by domain. Each item includes the failure mode/race condition/bottleneck, root cause, proposed solution, and explicit trade-offs. 🔌 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-4.1: Let's estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3. Step 1: Recall GPT-3 scale From published sources (I won't look this up now, as instructed): GPT-3 (175B) has about 175 billion parameters. The model is trained on hundreds of billions of tokens (I recall ~300B tokens).

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Here’s a step-by-step estimation of the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, using only first principles and widely known facts from the LLM training literature. Step 1: Identify the number of parameters GPT-3 (specifically the davinci variant) has 175 billion parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-4.1: This is a fascinating scenario! Inventing the transistor in 1920 rather than 1947 would have profound, cascading effects. Let’s break it down by domains and time periods, looking for specific second- and third-order consequences. Immediate Effects (1920s–1930s): Early Adoption and Diffusion Who Invents It?

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Introduction: Framing the Counterfactual A working transistor in 1920 requires an accelerated timeline for solid-state physics, materials purification, and circuit theory.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-4.1: Let's break down the problem: Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Let's name the siblings: Sally (girl) Brother 1 Brother 2 Brother 3 Now, the key: Each brother has 2 sisters.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: If each brother has 2 sisters, that means there are exactly 2 girls in the entire sibling group. Since Sally is one of those girls, the other girl is her only sister. (All the siblings share the same sisters, so Sally's perspective just excludes herself.)

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-4.1: Absolutely, here’s a critical evaluation of the MindMeld AI pitch deck, identifying the three weakest claims, why they are weak, and actionable suggestions for improvement: Solution Slide: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the pitch, why they raise red flags for investors, and how to fix them with concrete, investor-ready improvements. 🔹 1. Technical Claim: "94% accuracy decoding neural patterns into text. Works with any language, any device."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-4.1: 1. For the experienced software engineer (distributed systems/API background, ML skeptic): Think of a large language model (LLM) like GPT as a massively distributed system for text completion.

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a rules engine or a knowledge base, but as a massively parameterized, stateless function trained via distributed optimization. The learning objective is deceptively simple: minimize cross-entropy loss for next-token prediction across trillions of tokens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-4.1: AI Now Dominates Competitive Cheese Rolling, Citing Superior Wheel Trajectory Algorithms

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview: AI Exorcist Successfully Banishes Ancient Demon by Reading Terms of Service Until Spirit Voluntarily Returns to Hell

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

10+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-4.1GPT-4.1

Inception

2010

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Sapiens

Yuval Noah Harari

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.6 Max Preview
No pick

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

No pick

Tokyo

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview compared across 48 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4.1Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Input price$2/M tokens$1.04/M tokens
Output price$8/M tokens$6.24/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 2026
At 10M a month$20.00$20.00$10.40$10.40
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
GPT-4.12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$8.00 out·1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$8.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.6 Max Preview

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

GPT-4.1 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.6 Max Preview is developed by Qwen. GPT-4.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 48 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

It depends on your use case. GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 48 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-4.1 cost compared to Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

GPT-4.1 costs $2/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs $1.04/M input tokens. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is $0.96/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4.1 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-4.1 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-4.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-4.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4.1 MiniVersion compare
  • GPT-4.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingNew provider
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Gemini 2.0 Pro ExperimentalSame size
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17New provider
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025New provider

Model pages

  • GPT-4.159 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed