GPT-4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare GPT-4.5 by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, in 5 community votes, gpt-4.5 wins 80% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 10.0M, tested across 24 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4.5 or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.5 is the better choice overall, winning 80% of 5 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4.5 costs $75/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 128K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4.5 and Llama 4 Scout
GPT-4.5 is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-4.5 has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-4.5 costs $75/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. In community voting, In 5 community votes, GPT-4.5 wins 80% of head-to-head duels.
In 5 community votes, GPT-4.5 wins 80% of head-to-head duels. GPT-4.5 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 5+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Image Generation: GPT-4.5 wins 100% of votes
Web Design: GPT-4.5 and Llama 4 Scout are tied
Our Verdict
GPT-4.5Winner
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up
Pick GPT-4.5. In 5 blind votes, GPT-4.5 wins 80% of the time. That's not luck.
GPT-4.5 particularly excels in Image Generation. Llama 4 Scout is 300x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
98%
GPT-4.5 uses 12.2x more transitions
GPT-4.5
Llama 4 Scout
63%Vocabulary43%
16wSentence Length42w
0.57Hedging0.81
4.7Bold4.1
6.4Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.30Headings0.30
0.54Transitions0.04
Based on 11 + 10 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ