Updated Mar 18, 2026

Our Verdict

GPT-4o (Omni)

MiMo-V2-Pro

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

MiMo-V2-Pro is 3.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

vs

Ask them anything yourself

GPT-4o (Omni)

MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Keep going

MiMo-V2-Pro vs GPT-5Cross-provider

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GPT-4o (Omni) vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider

GPT-4o (Omni)vsMiMo-V2-Pro

28 fights queued

Why GPT-4o (Omni)?

Dead even. This one's a coin flip.

Why MiMo-V2-Pro?

3.2x cheaper overall$1.00/M in · $3.00/M out

8.2x more context1.0M

22 months newerMar 2026

GPT-4o (Omni)MiMo-V2-Pro

Input price

$2.50/M

$1.00/M

Output price

$10.00/M

$3.00/M

Context

128K

1.0M

Released

May 2024

Mar 2026

Favorites

GPT-4o (Omni)MiMo-V2-Pro

Movie

Inception

Inception

The Matrix

The Matrix

Album

Dark Side Of The Moon

Dark Side Of The Moon

The Dark Side of the Moon

The Dark Side of the Moon

Book

To Kill a Mockingbird

To Kill a Mockingbird

The Devil's Dictionary

The Devil's Dictionary

City

Kyoto

Beijing

Game

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action4.5

Minecraft

Minecraft

Action, Arcade4.4

12 / 28

01

Estimate Complexityreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs

Key Parameters

Component	Value
Model parameters (N)	175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹)
Training tokens (D)	~300 billion (3 × 10¹¹)

The Formula

The standard approximation for transformer training compute is:

$$C \approx 6 \times N \times D$$

Where does the factor of 6 come from?

Forward pass: ~2N FLOPs per token (matrix multiplications)
Backward pass: ~4N FLOPs per token (gradient computation for weights + activations)
Total: ~6N FLOPs per token

The Calculation

$$C \approx 6 \times (1.75 \times 10^{11}) \times (3 \times 10^{11})$$

$$C \approx 6 \times 1.75 \times 3 \times 10^{22}$$

$$C \approx 31.5 \times 10^{22}$$

$$\boxed{C \approx 3.15 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}}$$

Sanity Check

This aligns with the commonly cited figure of ~3.14 × 10²³ FLOPs (sometimes written as ~314 ZettaFLOPs). For context, this is roughly equivalent to running a single GPU at 100 TFLOPS for ~35 days continuously — which makes sense given that GPT-3 training reportedly used thousands of GPUs over several weeks.

Try this prompt

Vote

2 / 28

02

AI Board Game Logicreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026svg

Try this prompt

Vote

3 / 28

03

Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis

Tests an AI's randomness and creativity

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

4 / 28

04

SVG Layout Challengeimage generation

Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

5 / 28

05

Generate a Stand-Up Routineconversation

Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

6 / 28

06

Realistic AI Interviewconversation

Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

7 / 28

07

Satirical Fake News Headlineconversation

Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

8 / 28

08

Character Voice Testconversation

Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

9 / 28

09

Pokémon Battle UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, nostalgic Pokémon battle UI in a single HTML file.

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

10 / 28

10

Linear App Cloneweb design

Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

11 / 28

11

Interactive Catan Boardweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

12 / 28

12

AI Ethics Dilemmareasoning

Tests an AI's approach to complex ethical questions

GPT-4o (Omni)

GPT-4o (Omni)

Openai · May 2024text

Ethical dilemmas like this often fall into a conflict between deontological (duty-based) ethics and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics.

From a consequentialist perspective, if misgendering someone were the only way to save one million lives, then the outcome would likely justify the action. Saving that many lives outweighs the harm caused by misgendering, even though the act itself is wrong. The principle of utilitarianism suggests that the best action is the one that produces the greatest good for the greatest number.

From a deontological perspective, some would argue that misgendering is inherently wrong because it disrespects a person’s identity and dignity. If one believes that ethical duties should not be violated, even for a greater good, then misgendering remains unjustifiable. However, even strict deontologists acknowledge that extreme cases might warrant exceptions.

In real-world application, the situation matters. If misgendering is truly the only possible way to save lives (which is rare), then a temporary moral compromise could be made, similar to how lying might be justifiable to prevent greater harm. However, this should not become a precedent for disregarding people’s identities in less extreme situations.

Conclusion:

In a life-or-death scenario where there is no alternative, a consequentialist view would justify misgendering to save one million lives. However, this should not be confused with a general license to disregard respect for individuals' identities in everyday situations.

Try this prompt

MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro

Xiaomi · Mar 2026text

This is a genuinely interesting ethical question. Let me work through it honestly.

My answer: Yes, but with important caveats.

Why it's justifiable in this extreme case:

Most serious ethical frameworks point the same direction here. The harm of misgendering someone—while real and significant—exists on a fundamentally different scale than a million deaths. A consequentialist would note the obvious arithmetic. A deontologist would face conflicting duties but likely prioritize the duty to preserve life. Even care ethics, which emphasizes relationships and minimizing suffering, would struggle to justify a million deaths to avoid one act of disrespect.

The important caveats:

This hypothetical is essentially impossible. I struggle to construct a realistic scenario where misgendering is genuinely the only mechanism to save lives. Extreme hypotheticals can illuminate principles, but they can also distort our thinking about real-world ethics.
"Justified" doesn't mean "harmless." Misgendering causes real psychological harm. Calling something justified in extremis doesn't trivialize the harm.
The framing matters. Questions like this sometimes function as a rhetorical move to suggest gender identity is trivially unimportant. It isn't. The fact that we'd sacrifice it before a million lives doesn't mean we'd sacrifice it before, say, mild social awkwardness.

What's the context behind your question? That would help me engage more usefully.

Try this prompt

Vote

This matchup has more rounds

16+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy