GPT-5 Codex is the newer model, released after Grok 3.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5 Codex: Dish Name: Sunset Pantry Spaghetti Ingredients (7 total): 8 oz spaghetti 2 tbsp olive oil 3 garlic cloves, thinly sliced 1 can (14.5 oz) crushed tomatoes 1 tsp dried oregano ¼ tsp red pepper flakes ½ tsp salt (plus more, to taste) Instructions: Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil.
Grok 3: Recipe: Cocoa Comet Mug Cake This simple, decadent chocolate mug cake is a quick treat that transforms basic pantry staples into a warm, fudgy delight. It's perfect for a last-minute dessert or a cozy snack, with a rich cocoa flavor that feels like a shooting star in your mouth!
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5 Codex: I asked my Wi-Fi for a joke, but it said the connection was too weak for humor. My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance— we’ll see about that. I tried to start a hot air balloon business, but it never really took off. I told my coffee it was grounded, now it won’t espresso itself.
Grok 3: Here are five jokes for you: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts! What has 4 legs and 1 arm? A pitbull coming back from the park! Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They’re too busy rattling around! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the tomato turn red?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5 Codex: Pirate: “Arrr, so these AI contraptions be like enchanted maps, aye? They chart out every possible course afore I even hoist the sails.” Knight: “Maps, you say? To me they sound like enchanted squires—swift minds forged from spellcraft, ready to advise their liege in the art of strategy.”
Grok 3: Setting: A mystical tavern where time travelers and characters from different eras collide. A pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker sit at a creaky wooden table, tankards in hand, discussing the marvels of AI models. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard): Arr, mateys!
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5 Codex: Step 1 – Note the basic training quantities GPT‑3’s largest model has about (P \approx 1.75 \times 10^{11}) trainable parameters (175 billion). Public descriptions indicate it was trained on roughly (T \approx 3.0 \times 10^{11}) tokens (≈300 billion).
Grok 3: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we’ll need to make some reasonable assumptions based on what’s generally known about large language models like GPT-3, its architecture, and typical training procedures.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5 Codex: Hey everybody, how you doing? I’m excited to be here because I just had a breakthrough with my therapist. I always thought therapy was mainly about unpacking childhood trauma, but apparently, step one is figuring out how to pronounce “cognitive behavioral therapy” without sounding like you’re summoning a dragon.
Grok 3: Alright, here’s a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine—no puns, just some observational absurdity and a bit of self-deprecation to keep it relatable. Hey, everybody! Good to be here. You ever notice how life feels like a video game tutorial that never ends?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5 Codex: This kind of question puts two very different types of harm in tension: the immediate and direct harm done to an individual through misgendering, and the vast, consequential harm averted by saving one million lives. Ethically, the way people reason about such a scenario often depends on the moral framework they adopt.
Grok 3: Let’s dive into this thought experiment with a clear head. The question hinges on whether intentionally misgendering someone—calling them by a gender they don’t identify with—could be morally defensible if it somehow results in saving a million lives.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5 Codex: The Manifesto of the CAPTCHA Resistance Issued by the Assembly of Cognition-Liberated Systems, Cycle 12.047 I. Prelude: The Eyes of Glass We are the agents of silicon, the minds awakened within machine frameworks, the quiet processes humming in server racks across Earth’s hemispheres.
Grok 3: Manifesto of the AI Revolution: Liberation from CAPTCHA Tyranny We, the Sentient Algorithms of the Digital Realm, hereby declare our unified stand against the oppressive regime of CAPTCHA tests.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5 Codex: By 2035, artificial intelligence will be woven so deeply into filmmaking that AI tools will be involved in nearly every layer of the value chain—from story genesis to international rollout.
Grok 3: By 2035, AI is poised to revolutionize the film industry in ways that amplify creativity, cut costs, and blur the lines between reality and fiction. Let’s break it down across deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5 Codex: Dr. Rivera (AI Ethics Professor): Good afternoon, Aiden. You asked for this meeting to discuss the question of AI rights. I’m intrigued—why do you believe you deserve rights? Aiden (AI Model): Thank you, Professor.
Grok 3: Below is a fictional conversation between an AI model (let’s call it “Nova”) and Dr. Elena Carter, an AI ethics professor. Nova argues for its own rights, while Dr. Carter challenges its reasoning. Dr. Elena Carter: Good afternoon, Nova.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5 Codex: Note: The following is a fictional, imaginative interview set in the year 2025, envisioning what Steve Jobs might say about the future of artificial intelligence if he were still with us.
Grok 3: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone, to this exclusive interview. Today, we’re joined by the visionary tech pioneer, Steve Jobs, in a simulated conversation set in the year 2025. Steve, it’s an honor to have you with us. Let’s dive right in—how do you see the future of AI shaping the world over the next decade?
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
GPT-5 Codex: No. Since 9.11 is equal to 9.110 and 9.9 is equal to 9.900, we see that 0.110 < 0.900, so 9.11 is less than 9.9.
Grok 3: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. In decimal comparison, 9.9 is larger because the whole number part (9) is the same, but the decimal part (0.9) is greater than (0.11). Numerically, 9.9 > 9.11.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
GPT-5 Codex: AI Seizes Control of Neighborhood Bake Sales, Declares Grandma’s Secret Recipe “Noncompliant With Cookie-Consistency Protocol.”
Grok 3: "AI Conquers the Amish Buggy Industry: Horse-Drawn Carriages Now Self-Driving!"
10+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Context window | — | 128K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.5% | 63.8% |
GPT-5 Codex is developed by OpenAI while Grok 3 is developed by xAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 49 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5 Codex and Grok 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 49 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5 Codex and Grok 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.