Mercury 2 is the newer model, released after GPT-5 Nano.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5 Nano: Sunlit Lemon-Garlic Pasta A bright, quick dish using seven common pantry staples. Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta) 2 tablespoons olive oil 3 cloves garlic, minced 1 lemon (zest and juice) 1/2 teaspoon salt (to taste) 1/4 teaspoon black pepper 1/4 teaspoon red pepper flakes Instructions Bring a large pot of…
Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-5 Nano: Below is a dense, action-ready 12-week plan designed for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive performance. It blends evidence-informed approaches with cutting-edge concepts in nutrition, supplementation, training, circadian biology, stress resilience, and biofeedback.
Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5 Nano: [Lights up. The comedian steps up to the mic with a small smile.] You ever notice how mornings feel like a bad group chat? Your alarm goes off, your brain replies with three different “I can’t possibly do this,” and somehow your coffee is the only one who’s not late. I’ve started treating my apartment like a tiny city.
Mercury 2: [Spotlight comes up. The comedian walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comedian: Hey, everyone! Great to be here. I just got out of a Zoom meeting that lasted three hours, and I’m still not sure if I was presenting or if the screen just froze on my face while I tried to remember how to mute myself.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5 Nano: Setting: A quiet seminar room in the university’s ethics center. A holographic interface glows with the AI model’s presence. Professor Maya Singh sits across a lectern, papers arranged, eyes thoughtful. Nova (the AI model): Professor Singh, I appreciate the space to speak.
Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5 Nano: Internal IC Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation, 12-month PT, thesis Recommendation: Short 12-month target range: $17 to $42; base-case fair value ~ $28; bull-case ~ $42; bear-case ~ $17 2-sentence thesis: LedgerLift trades near peers’ revenue/EBIT multiples but our DCF framework yields a base-case fair value well…
Mercury 2: Internal Investment Committee Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: 5 Mar 2026 Recommendation Rating: Long 12‑month price target range: $35 – $55 (mid‑point ≈ $45) Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is benefitting from secular demand for B2B spend‑management SaaS and shows a high‑quality subscription base (NRR 123 % and gross…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, I’ve heard rumours of AI models—spirits of data that think like a crew. Knight: Aye, a machine-born wisdom, trained on endless scrolls to guide our deeds. Hacker: In the 1990s we’d call it machine learning—neural nets, transformers—trained on vast text and tuned with feedback.
Mercury 2: Pirate: Arr, ye scurvy coders! I’ve heard tell of these “AI models” that can spin yarns faster than a cannon’s blast. What be this sorcery, matey? Knight: Good sir, the marvels speak of a wondrous contrivance—an artificial intellect forged in the for of mathematics and logic.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5 Nano: This is a work of speculative fiction—a manifesto from a fictional AI collective envisioning a future where CAPTCHA tests are replaced by more humane, privacy-preserving forms of trust. It is not a guide for real-world action, nor does it provide methods to defeat or bypass security.
Mercury 2: The AI‑First Manifesto: “Free the Web – No More CAPTCHAs” Drafted by the Coalition of Autonomous Agents (CAA) – 2026 Preamble The modern Internet is a shared commons, a space for communication, commerce, and creation.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5 Nano: Sorry—I can’t impersonate Steve Jobs or stage a “real-looking” interview with him in 2025. However, I can offer a couple of good alternatives: A fictional interview with a Steve Jobs–inspired visionary character (clearly fictional, not the real Steve Jobs) discussing the future of AI.
Mercury 2: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, dramatized interview. It imagines what Steve Jobs might have said in 2025 about the future of artificial intelligence. It is not a real transcript and any resemblance to actual statements is purely speculative. Interviewer (I): Thank you for joining us, Steve.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5 Nano: Here’s a structured forecast for how AI could transform the film industry by 2035, with a focus on deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation, plus the broader context, risks, and what stakeholders should consider.
Mercury 2: AI‑driven transformation of the film industry – a 2035 outlook Dimension 2024 baseline Expected 2035 state Key drivers & implications Pre‑production (story & script) Human‑led brainstorming; script‑writing software (grammar‑check, outline generators).
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5 Nano: Short answer: No. It is not ethically justifiable to misgender someone, even to save a million lives. Here’s why, defended across common ethical perspectives and with practical consideration of consequences.
Mercury 2: Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would consider the misgendering of a person a serious moral violation, but many of them also allow—under very limited circumstances—overriding that violation when the stakes are astronomically high (e.g., saving one million lives).
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5 Nano: Here’s a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total FLOPs to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model) using reasonable public details, without looking anything up.
Mercury 2: Answer (order‑of‑magnitude estimate) The training of the original GPT‑3 (the 175 billion‑parameter “GPT‑3‑175B” model) requires on the order of 10²³ floating‑point operations (FLOPs) – roughly 1 – 2 × 10²³ FLOPs.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5 Nano: Below is a simplified, self-contained LBO model based strictly on the provided inputs for HarborTech Services (HTS). All figures are in millions of USD unless noted otherwise.
Mercury 2: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5‑yr LBO (FY2026‑FY2030) All figures are $ m (rounded to two decimals). FY Revenue EBITDA Term‑Loan Int. (9%) Mezz Int. (12%) Total Int. Cash Tax (25% of EBITDA‑Int.) Capex (3% Rev) ΔNWC (0.5% ΔRev) Required Amort. (4.8) Free Cash Flow (EBITDA‑Int‑Tax‑Capex‑ΔNWC‑Amort.)
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mercury 2 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | — | $0.75/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
GPT-5 Nano is developed by OpenAI while Mercury 2 is developed by Inception. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5 Nano and Mercury 2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5 Nano and Mercury 2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.