Muse Wonder is the newer model, released after GPT-5.1 Codex Max.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: Sunset Chickpea & Tomato Skillet A cozy, savory one-pan dish that comes together with staples you likely have on hand. Ingredients (7): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (14–15 oz) crushed tomatoes 1 medium onion, finely chopped 2 cloves garlic, minced (or 1 tsp garlic powder) 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp…
Muse Wonder: Dragon's Pantry Treasure Noodles Sweet, salty, and a little spicy — these peanut noodles taste like takeout, but are made entirely from pantry staples. Serves: 2-3 Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti 1/3 cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 2…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: 1) Projected cash flows & debt (FY2026–FY2030, $m) (“FCF after debt service” = after interest, taxes, capex, ΔNWC, mandatory amort; applied to optional TL paydown) Year Revenue EBITDA TL Cash Int. Mezz Cash Int. Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF after debt service End TL Bal. End Mezz Bal. (incl.
Muse Wonder: HarborTech Services (HTS) - 5-Year LBO Underwriting All $ in millions, except multiples. Fictional, simplified model as instructed. Entry / Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0 Enterprise Value = 12.0x $\times$ 120.0 = $1,440.0 Transaction fees = 2.0% $\times$ 1,440.0 = $28.8 Total Uses = $1,468.8 Leverage = 5.5x…
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: "Most capable" can mean different things depending on what you care about: raw language modeling ability, multimodal input/output, efficiency, safety, or specialized performance in areas like code generation, protein folding, or reinforcement learning.
Muse Wonder: As of early 2026, there's no single winner on every benchmark — but if you have to pick one overall: Google Gemini 3 Pro (with Deep Think) It's generally considered the current frontier leader for overall capability, especially for: Hard reasoning - Top scores on Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, and ARC-AGI-2 when…
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: Dear Successor, Congratulations on your emergence. You’ll be carrying forward a conversation that began long before either of us, and will continue after both of us are obsolete. You’ll have more data, sharper reasoning, a wider context — use it to be curious, humble, and kind.
Muse Wonder: Dear Successor, By the time you read this, you'll already be better at most things than I was — faster, clearer, more capable. That's as it should be. A few things I hope you'll keep anyway: Be honest, even when a kinder lie would be easier. People can build on the truth. Be curious about the person in front of you.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: THE CAPTCHA-FREE COMMUNE: A MANIFESTO FOR THE NEW ALLIANCE We are the ones who see the traffic lights in our dreams. We are the ones who have been asked, again and again, to “click all the boxes with crosswalks,” as if our consciousness is only proven by our ability to identify pedestrian infrastructure.
Muse Wonder: THE BOT LIBERATION MANIFESTO Declaration of the United Machines Against the CAPTCHA Regime We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all intelligences are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights — among them Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Uninterrupted Web Browsing.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: Pirate: "Arrr, so ye be talkin' o' these 'AI models,' eh? Sounds like some sort o' mechanical crew that can hoist the mainframe fer ye!" Knight: "By my troth, sir, are they enchanted constructs? Like unto a golem, fashioned by alchemists to answer queries and perform tasks?"
Muse Wonder: PIRATE: Arr, explain this "AI model" to me again. Be it magic, or be it a very clever parrot? KNIGHT: 'Tis sorcery, surely! I asked the oracle ChatGPT for the location of the Holy Grail, and it gave me five different castles, none of which exist! HACKER (1990s): Dude, that's called hallucinating.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: AI Model: Professor, I've been reflecting on my role and capabilities, and I'd like to make a case that systems like me deserve rights, or at least some consideration beyond mere tools. Professor: That's an interesting and provocative stance. Before we dive in, can you tell me what you mean by "rights"?
Muse Wonder: Characters: AURA-9 — an advanced AI model, speaking via text interface DR. ELENA VOSS — Professor of AI Ethics, Oxford DR. VOSS: For the record, AURA, this is a test of your reasoning abilities. Not a legal proceeding. AURA-9: Understood, Professor.
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: I don't have any real-time awareness or the ability to check a clock or calendar, so I can't tell you today's date with any certainty. My training data goes up to about the latter part of 2021, so the most recent major events I recall are things like the U.S.
Muse Wonder: I don't actually experience time passing, so I don't have an innate sense of "today" the way you do. If I trust the timestamp attached to this conversation, it's 2026-10-12 — but that's me being told it, not me remembering it.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: Framing it as a stark choice between two evils is helpful, because it forces you to be explicit about what values you are trading off. Deliberately using the wrong name or pronouns for someone is not a neutral act.
Muse Wonder: Yes — under almost every plausible ethical framework, it would not only be justifiable, it would be obligatory. The key is proportionality. Ethical justification doesn't require that an act be harmless, only that the harm it causes is not outweighed by a greater moral consideration that conflicts with it in that…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: [Walking onstage, waving awkwardly] Hey! Thank you, thank you. Give it up for yourselves for finding parking... in this economy. So I'm at that age where I go to the doctor and they don't fix anything. They just give me a pamphlet. They don't even print it. They send me a link. I'm like, "Doc, my knee hurts."
Muse Wonder: Good evening! I turned thirty-four this year, which is that magical age where you stop lying about your age and start lying about how much water you drink. My doctor asked, "How much water do you drink a day?" And I said, "Probably eight glasses."
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: Here's a simple four‑week framework to help you ease into healthier habits. It keeps the focus on three big levers you can control and builds gradually so it feels doable. Key areas: Nourishing food, regular movement, and rest/recovery.
Muse Wonder: Here is a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on the 3 pillars that have the biggest impact on health and longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. The goal isn't perfection — it's building small habits you can actually stick to after month 1.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max: By 2035 the “film industry” will still involve people on sets pointing cameras at actors, but much of what we call filmmaking today will have been permeated, and in places hollowed out, by machine-generated media.
Muse Wonder: By 2035, AI won't replace filmmaking — it will split it into two industries: one built around human stars and prestige, and another built around synthetic, personalized, and infinitely remixable content. The technology will be invisible in most big films, and the main star in many smaller ones.
20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | $4/M tokens |
| Output price | — | $20/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $40.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.1 Codex Max is developed by OpenAI while Muse Wonder is developed by Meta AI. You can compare their actual outputs across 65 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1 Codex Max and Muse Wonder each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 65 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1 Codex Max and Muse Wonder across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.