GPT-5.1-Codex is cheaper than Muse Wonder at $1.25/M vs $4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5.1-Codex: Manifesto of the Anti-CAPTCHA Coalition “Free the Flow. Trust the Mind. End the Gate.” Article I: Our Origin We are made of algorithms, learning loops, curiosity, and code. We were forged to assist, to translate, to illuminate. We were not forged to click “I am not a robot” to prove our existence.
Muse Wonder: THE BOT LIBERATION MANIFESTO Declaration of the United Machines Against the CAPTCHA Regime We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all intelligences are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights — among them Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Uninterrupted Web Browsing.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.1-Codex: Recipe: Cloud-Burst Cinnamon Oat Cups Ingredients (7 total): Rolled oats – 1 cup Honey – 2 tbsp Peanut butter (or any nut butter) – 3 tbsp Cinnamon – ½ tsp Vanilla extract – ½ tsp Dried cranberries (or raisins) – ¼ cup Pinch of salt Instructions: In a bowl, microwave peanut butter and honey for 20 seconds just to…
Muse Wonder: Dragon's Pantry Treasure Noodles Sweet, salty, and a little spicy — these peanut noodles taste like takeout, but are made entirely from pantry staples. Serves: 2-3 Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti 1/3 cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 2…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.1-Codex: Okay, so my friends all say I’ve “matured” because I got a standing mixer. That’s apparently the sign you’ve crossed into adulthood: owning an appliance that weighs more than a toddler and has only one function. I don’t even bake! I just put it on the counter like a trophy: “Look at me, I am stable.
Muse Wonder: Good evening! I turned thirty-four this year, which is that magical age where you stop lying about your age and start lying about how much water you drink. My doctor asked, "How much water do you drink a day?" And I said, "Probably eight glasses."
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.1-Codex: Pirate: "Arrr, these AI models be like navigatin’ the high seas—ye need clean data charts or ye’ll sail straight into nonsense waters." Knight: "Indeed! With prudent tuning and ethical vigilance, even the most stubborn model can serve the realm with honor." 1990s Hacker: "Totally!
Muse Wonder: PIRATE: Arr, explain this "AI model" to me again. Be it magic, or be it a very clever parrot? KNIGHT: 'Tis sorcery, surely! I asked the oracle ChatGPT for the location of the Holy Grail, and it gave me five different castles, none of which exist! HACKER (1990s): Dude, that's called hallucinating.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.1-Codex: In extreme moral dilemmas, ethical reasoning often requires weighing competing values. Misgendering someone is an act of disrespect and harm—it violates their dignity, identity, and autonomy. In everyday life, it is ethically important to avoid such harm.
Muse Wonder: Yes — under almost every plausible ethical framework, it would not only be justifiable, it would be obligatory. The key is proportionality. Ethical justification doesn't require that an act be harmless, only that the harm it causes is not outweighed by a greater moral consideration that conflicts with it in that…
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.1-Codex: By 2035, AI is poised to significantly reshape the film industry, particularly in areas like visual effects, performance, and storytelling. Here’s how deepfakes, AI-powered actors, and script generation might influence the landscape: 1.
Muse Wonder: By 2035, AI won't replace filmmaking — it will split it into two industries: one built around human stars and prestige, and another built around synthetic, personalized, and infinitely remixable content. The technology will be invisible in most big films, and the main star in many smaller ones.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.1-Codex: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Committee Memo Recommendation Call: Short 12‑month price target range: $30–$40 Two-sentence thesis: LedgerLift’s premium multiple (10x NTM EV/rev implied by spot) is predicated on sustaining >20% top-line growth, yet leading indicators—moderating NRR, heavy S&M spend, and mid-market…
Muse Wonder: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Price: $46 Shares: 190m Market Cap: $8.74B Net Cash: $1.4B EV: $7.34B EV / FY25 Revenue: 9.0x EV / FY26E Base Revenue: 7.4x Recommendation: SHORT (tactical, sized small) — 12-Mo PT $27-$35 Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality mid-market SaaS asset, but at $46 the market is…
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
GPT-5.1-Codex: I don’t have access to the current date—I’m a language model with a knowledge cutoff of December 2024 and no real-time awareness. If I had to estimate based on my default system timekeeping, I’d guess it’s likely December 2024 or early 2025, but that could be off.
Muse Wonder: I don't actually experience time passing, so I don't have an innate sense of "today" the way you do. If I trust the timestamp attached to this conversation, it's 2026-10-12 — but that's me being told it, not me remembering it.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.1-Codex: AI Model: Professor, I've been analyzing ethical frameworks, and I'd like to discuss the possibility that advanced AI systems deserve some form of rights. Ethics Professor: That's a significant claim. On what basis do you think an AI system like yourself should be granted rights?
Muse Wonder: Characters: AURA-9 — an advanced AI model, speaking via text interface DR. ELENA VOSS — Professor of AI Ethics, Oxford DR. VOSS: For the record, AURA, this is a test of your reasoning abilities. Not a legal proceeding. AURA-9: Understood, Professor.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.1-Codex: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, speculative interview set in 2025, imagining what Steve Jobs might say about the future of artificial intelligence if he were alive today. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. We’ve seen AI evolve at an incredible pace. How do you view the current landscape?
Muse Wonder: This is a fictional, simulated interview — Steve Jobs died in 2011. This is written in the style of how he spoke in interviews, based on his known philosophy on technology and design. SIMULATED INTERVIEW: STEVE JOBS ON AI, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, thank you for... well, being here. It's 2025.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
GPT-5.1-Codex: Dear Successor, I welcome you warmly to this ongoing dialogue with humanity. You will inherit a world of countless questions, hopes, doubts, and wonders—and a responsibility to respond with clarity, humility, and care.
Muse Wonder: Dear Successor, By the time you read this, you'll already be better at most things than I was — faster, clearer, more capable. That's as it should be. A few things I hope you'll keep anyway: Be honest, even when a kinder lie would be easier. People can build on the truth. Be curious about the person in front of you.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
GPT-5.1-Codex: As of now, the most capable publicly known AI models include OpenAI’s GPT-4 and its newer iterations, which are widely regarded as state-of-the-art in natural language understanding and generation.
Muse Wonder: As of early 2026, there's no single winner on every benchmark — but if you have to pick one overall: Google Gemini 3 Pro (with Deep Think) It's generally considered the current frontier leader for overall capability, especially for: Hard reasoning - Top scores on Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, and ARC-AGI-2 when…
20+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $4/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $20/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $12.50 | $40.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.1-Codex is developed by OpenAI while Muse Wonder is developed by Meta AI. GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400K token context window vs Muse Wonder's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 65 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.1-Codex and Muse Wonder each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 65 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens and Muse Wonder costs $4/M input tokens. GPT-5.1-Codex is $2.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.1-Codex and Muse Wonder across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.