GPT-5.2 Pro vs Mistral Large 2
Compare GPT-5.2 Pro by OpenAI against Mistral Large 2 by Mistral AI, context windows of 400K vs 128K, tested across 10 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
FAQ
Loading share button...
GPT-5.2 ProvsMistral Large 2
10 challenges
Why GPT-5.2 Pro?
3.1x more context400K
17 months newerDec 2025
Why Mistral Large 2?
6.2x cheaper overall$8.00/M in · $24.00/M out
Favorites
GPT-5.2 ProMistral Large 2
10 / 10
Xbox Controller SVG Artimage generation
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Mistral Large 2
Vote
2 / 10
Mario Level UI Recreationweb design
Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
Vote
3 / 10
Beginner's Longevity Planreasoning
Create a starter plan for improving long-term health.
GPT-5.2 Pro
A simple, actionable 1‑month plan (3 pillars: Nutrition, Movement, Sleep/Recovery)
Goal for the month: build repeatable “default” habits (not perfection).
Time required: ~45–75 min/day total (mostly walking + sleep routine).
Safety: If you have medical conditions, pain, or haven’t exercised in a long time, start gentler and consider clinician guidance.
Pillar 1) Nutrition (eat to support energy, muscle, and metabolic health)
The rules (keep these all month)
- Protein at every meal (helps muscle/long-term function).
- Target: a “palm-sized” portion 2–3x/day (eggs, Greek yogurt, chicken, tofu, beans + grain combo).
- Plants at least twice/day (fiber + micronutrients).
- Target: 2 fist-sized servings of fruits/veg daily → build to 4+.
- Default drinks: water, unsweetened tea/coffee.
- Keep sugary drinks “rare,” alcohol minimal (longevity-friendly).
- 80/20 approach: most meals supportive, some flexible.
Ultra-simple plate template
- ½ plate non-starchy veg (salad, broccoli, peppers, frozen veg)
- ¼ plate protein (fish, chicken, beans, tofu, yogurt)
- ¼ plate high-fiber carbs (brown rice, oats, potatoes, whole grains, fruit)
- + 1 thumb healthy fat (olive oil, nuts, avocado)
Pillar 2) Movement (cardio base + strength for longevity)
The rules (keep these all month)
- Walk most days (lowest barrier, big payoff).
- Strength train 2x/week minimum (maintains muscle, bone, insulin sensitivity).
- Progress slowly: add a little time/reps each week.
Beginner full‑body strength session (20–30 min)
Do 2 rounds (Week 1), then 2–3 rounds later:
- Squat to chair or bodyweight squat – 8–12 reps
- Incline push-ups (hands on counter) – 6–12 reps
- Hip hinge (Romanian deadlift with backpack) – 8–12 reps
- Row (resistance band or dumbbell/backpack row) – 8–12 reps/side
- Plank – 15–30 sec (or dead bug 6–10/side)
Effort: finish each set with ~2–3 reps “in reserve” (not to failure).
If anything hurts (sharp pain): stop and swap the movement.
Pillar 3) Sleep/Recovery (sleep + stress reduction to sustain everything)
The rules (keep these all month)
- Consistent wake time (most powerful sleep lever).
- Wind-down routine (short, repeatable).
- Morning light + light movement (anchors circadian rhythm).
Simple nightly routine (10–20 min total)
- Screens down (or dim) 30–60 min before bed when possible
- Quick prep: set clothes/water, tidy 2 minutes
- 5 minutes: breathing (slow nasal breathing) or gentle stretch
- Bedroom: cool, dark, quiet
The 1‑month plan (week-by-week)
Week 1: Establish the baseline (make it easy)
Nutrition
- Add protein to breakfast 5/7 days (eggs, yogurt, tofu scramble, protein smoothie).
- Add 1 extra fruit or veg daily.
- Keep “trigger foods” out of the house once this week (or buy single portions).
Movement
- Walk 20 minutes 5 days this week (easy pace is fine).
- Do 1 strength session (the routine above).
Sleep/Recovery
- Pick a wake time you can keep within ~30–60 minutes daily.
- Aim for 7–8 hours in bed (even if sleep isn’t perfect yet).
- Get 5–10 minutes outdoor light within 1 hour of waking (walk counts).
Week 2: Make it consistent (add structure)
Nutrition
- Use the plate template for one meal/day.
- Add 2nd fruit/veg serving daily.
- Decide a simple default lunch (repeatable):
e.g., rotisserie chicken + salad kit + olive oil, or lentils + microwave rice + frozen veg.
Movement
- Walk 25–30 minutes 5 days/week.
- Do 2 strength sessions (same routine).
- Add 5 minutes of mobility after walks (hips/ankles/shoulders).
Sleep/Recovery
- Set a caffeine cutoff: ~8 hours before bedtime (or by 2 pm).
- Wind-down: 10 minutes nightly (stretch + breathing or reading).
Week 3: Improve quality (small upgrades, not more rules)
Nutrition
- Aim for 25–30g fiber/day by adding one: beans/lentils, oats, chia, berries, veggies.
- Eat protein at 2–3 meals/day.
- Plan 2 “good enough” dinners you can repeat:
- Example: salmon (or tofu) + frozen veg + microwave potatoes
- Example: turkey/bean chili + bagged salad
Movement
- Walk 30 minutes 5 days/week.
- Keep 2 strength sessions.
- Add 1 optional “spice” session: 10 minutes of intervals during a walk
(e.g., 1 minute faster / 2 minutes easy × 3–4 rounds).
Sleep/Recovery
- Add a 2-minute downshift once daily (midday or evening):
slow breathing (inhale ~4 sec, exhale ~6 sec) for 10 breaths. - Protect sleep: keep the wake time consistent even after a rough night.
Week 4: Lock it in (turn actions into defaults)
Nutrition
- Identify your “forever basics”:
- 2 breakfasts you like
- 2 lunches you can repeat
- 3 simple dinners
- Keep treats intentional: choose 2–3 flexible meals/week and enjoy them guilt-free.
Movement
- Target the longevity minimums:
- 150 minutes/week moderate walking (or equivalent)
- 2 strength sessions/week (continue progressing reps/rounds)
- Choose one enjoyable activity to continue next month (swim, dance, cycling, class).
Sleep/Recovery
- Keep the wake time and wind-down routine.
- Do a quick check: What most improved your sleep (light, caffeine cutoff, screens, room temp)? Keep that as your non-negotiable.
Daily “minimum viable day” checklist (when motivation is low)
- Nutrition: protein + plant at 2 meals
- Movement: 10-minute walk
- Sleep/Recovery: consistent wake time + 5-minute wind-down
Simple tracking (2 minutes/day)
Pick 2–3 metrics max:
- Steps (or minutes walked)
- Strength sessions completed
- Bedtime/wake time consistency
- Fruit/veg servings (or “protein at meals”)
If you tell me your age range, schedule constraints (e.g., desk job, parenting), dietary preferences, and current activity level, I can tailor the weekly targets and give you a specific “default menu” + walking/strength calendar.
Mistral Large 2
Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan to kickstart your journey toward better health and longevity. We’ll focus on three key pillars: nutrition, movement, and recovery (sleep + stress management). Each week builds on the last, with small, sustainable changes.
📅 Month 1 Plan: "The Foundation Phase"
Goal: Establish consistent habits in nutrition, movement, and recovery without overwhelm.
🔑 3 Key Areas & Weekly Focus
| Week | Nutrition | Movement | Recovery (Sleep + Stress) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hydration + Whole Foods | Walk 10K steps/day | 7-hour sleep + 5-min breathing |
| 2 | Protein + Fiber Focus | Bodyweight Strength | Sleep routine + Digital sunset |
| 3 | Reduce Processed Foods | Add Mobility Work | Gratitude + 10-min "me time" |
| 4 | Mindful Eating | Increase Intensity | Optimize Sleep Environment |
🍽️ Nutrition: Eat for Energy & Longevity
Goal: Shift toward whole, nutrient-dense foods while keeping it simple.
Week 1: Hydration + Whole Foods First
- Action 1: Drink half your body weight (lbs) in oz of water daily (e.g., 150 lbs = 75 oz).
- Tip: Start your day with 16 oz of water; carry a bottle.
- Action 2: Add 1 serving of veggies to every meal (e.g., spinach in eggs, carrots with lunch).
- Action 3: Swap 1 processed snack for a whole-food option (e.g., nuts instead of chips, fruit instead of candy).
Week 2: Protein + Fiber Focus
- Action 1: Eat 20–30g protein at every meal (e.g., eggs, chicken, tofu, Greek yogurt).
- Tip: Use a protein shake if needed (whey or plant-based).
- Action 2: Add 1 high-fiber food daily (e.g., oats, lentils, berries, broccoli).
- Action 3: Cook 1 new simple recipe (e.g., sheet-pan chicken + veggies, stir-fry).
Week 3: Reduce Processed Foods
- Action 1: Cut out sugary drinks (soda, juice, sweetened coffee). Replace with sparkling water or herbal tea.
- Action 2: Read labels—avoid foods with >5 ingredients or added sugars in the first 3 ingredients.
- Action 3: Meal prep 1 lunch for the week (e.g., grilled chicken + quinoa + roasted veggies).
Week 4: Mindful Eating
- Action 1: Eat slowly—put your fork down between bites; chew 20 times.
- Action 2: Stop eating at 80% full (use a smaller plate if needed).
- Action 3: Try 1 "no phone" meal per day to focus on hunger/fullness cues.
🏃 Movement: Move More, Stress Less
Goal: Build consistency with enjoyable movement (no gym required).
Week 1: Walk 10K Steps/Day
- Action 1: Track steps (use phone or cheap pedometer). Aim for 5K steps/day first, then build to 10K.
- Action 2: Take 2–3 short walks (e.g., 10-min post-meal, 15-min during lunch).
- Action 3: Stand every 30–60 mins if you have a desk job (set a timer).
Week 2: Bodyweight Strength (2x/Week)
- Action 1: Do 2 strength sessions (e.g., Monday/Thursday). Try this 10-min routine:
- 3 rounds of:
- 10 squats
- 10 push-ups (on knees or against a wall if needed)
- 10 lunges (each leg)
- 30-sec plank
- 3 rounds of:
- Action 2: Add 1K steps to your daily goal (e.g., 6K → 7K).
Week 3: Add Mobility Work
- Action 1: Stretch for 5 mins daily (focus on hips, shoulders, hamstrings). Try this 5-min routine.
- Action 2: Replace 10 mins of sitting with movement (e.g., walk while on phone calls).
- Action 3: Try 1 new activity (e.g., yoga, swimming, dancing).
Week 4: Increase Intensity
- Action 1: Add 1 interval session (e.g., 30-sec fast walk/jog + 1-min slow, repeat 5x).
- Action 2: Do 3 strength sessions this week (add 1 more push-up/squat to each set).
- Action 3: Stand for 1 hour/day (e.g., while working, watching TV).
😴 Recovery: Sleep + Stress Management
Goal: Prioritize rest and reduce chronic stress.
Week 1: 7-Hour Sleep + 5-Min Breathing
- Action 1: Set a bedtime alarm to get 7 hours of sleep (e.g., lights out by 10:30 PM if you wake at 5:30 AM).
- Action 2: 5-min deep breathing before bed (try 4-7-8 breathing).
- Action 3: No screens 30 mins before bed (read a book or journal instead).
Week 2: Sleep Routine + Digital Sunset
- Action 1: Create a wind-down routine (e.g., herbal tea, stretching, dim lights 1 hour before bed).
- Action 2: Stop caffeine by 2 PM (switch to decaf or herbal tea).
- Action 3: No work/emails 1 hour before bed.
Week 3: Gratitude + "Me Time"
- Action 1: Write 3 things you’re grateful for daily (keep a notebook by your bed).
- Action 2: Take 10 mins of "me time" daily (e.g., walk, bath, hobby—no screens!).
- Action 3: Try progressive muscle relaxation (5 mins before bed—guide here).
Week 4: Optimize Sleep Environment
- Action 1: Make your bedroom dark, cool (65–68°F), and quiet (use blackout curtains, earplugs, or white noise).
- Action 2: No late-night eating (stop eating 2–3 hours before bed).
- Action 3: Get 15 mins of sunlight in the morning to regulate your circadian rhythm.
📌 Weekly Checklist (Printable)
| Week | Nutrition | Movement | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ☐ 1/2 body weight in oz water ☐ 1 veggie/meal ☐ Swap 1 snack | ☐ 5K steps/day ☐ 2–3 short walks | ☐ 7-hour sleep ☐ 5-min breathing |
| 2 | ☐ 20–30g protein/meal ☐ 1 high-fiber food ☐ Cook 1 new recipe | ☐ 2 strength sessions ☐ +1K steps | ☐ Wind-down routine ☐ No caffeine after 2 PM |
| 3 | ☐ No sugary drinks ☐ Read labels ☐ Meal prep 1 lunch | ☐ 5-min stretch daily ☐ Replace 10 mins sitting ☐ Try 1 new activity | ☐ Gratitude journal ☐ 10-min "me time" |
| 4 | ☐ Eat slowly ☐ 80% full ☐ 1 no-phone meal | ☐ 1 interval session ☐ 3 strength sessions ☐ Stand 1 hour/day | ☐ Optimize sleep environment ☐ No late-night eating ☐ Morning sunlight |
💡 Pro Tips for Success
- Start small: Pick 1–2 actions per week to focus on (don’t overwhelm yourself).
- Track progress: Use a habit tracker (e.g., Habitica or a simple calendar).
- Be flexible: Miss a day? Just restart the next day—no guilt.
- Celebrate wins: Did you hit 10K steps? Ate veggies at every meal? Acknowledge it!
- Find an accountability buddy: Share your goals with a friend or join a community (e.g., r/loseit, r/bodyweightfitness).
🎯 After Month 1: What’s Next?
- Nutrition: Experiment with intermittent fasting (e.g., 12-hour overnight fast) or try a new healthy recipe weekly.
- Movement: Add resistance (e.g., dumbbells, resistance bands) or try a new sport (e.g., cycling, tennis).
- Recovery: Explore meditation (try Headspace or Waking Up) or get a sleep tracker (e.g., Oura Ring, Whoop).
Remember: Health is a marathon, not a sprint. This plan is about building habits that last, not perfection. After 30 days, you’ll have a solid foundation to keep improving!
Would you like any modifications based on your current lifestyle (e.g., busy schedule, dietary restrictions)?
Vote
Sponsored
4 / 10
Autonomous Drone Simulatorweb design
Create an autonomous drone simulator with custom environment using ThreeJS
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
Vote
5 / 10
Adversarial Contract Reviewreasoning
Find exploitable clauses in a software consulting contract and suggest modifications with legal reasoning.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
This contract is heavily one-sided in favor of the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.) and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited, abused, or create unreasonable legal and financial risks for the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis, specific modifications, and legal reasoning for each problematic provision.
1. SCOPE (Unlimited Modifications Without Compensation)
Problem:
"Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation."
Exploitable Risks:
- Scope creep without pay: The Client can demand endless changes, expansions, or pivots without adjusting compensation.
- No definition of "scope": The term is vague, allowing the Client to argue that any work falls under the original scope.
- No termination rights for the Contractor: If the Client keeps expanding scope, the Contractor has no recourse.
Suggested Modifications:
"The scope of work shall be defined in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Any material changes to the scope (including additional features, extended timelines, or new deliverables) must be mutually agreed upon in writing and may result in an adjustment to compensation, timeline, or both. If the Client requests changes that increase the Contractor’s workload by more than 20% of the original scope, the Contractor may renegotiate terms or terminate the agreement with 30 days’ written notice."
Legal Reasoning:
- Mutual agreement on scope changes prevents unilateral exploitation.
- Materiality threshold (e.g., 20%) ensures minor tweaks don’t trigger renegotiation but major changes do.
- Termination right for the Contractor balances power if the Client abuses scope changes.
2. PAYMENT (90-Day Payment Terms + Unilateral "Unsatisfactory" Withholding)
Problem:
"Payment is due within 90 days of invoice receipt. Client may withhold payment if deliverables are deemed 'unsatisfactory' at Client's sole discretion."
Exploitable Risks:
- 90-day payment terms are predatory: Most jurisdictions cap payment terms at 30 days (e.g., EU Late Payment Directive, some U.S. state laws). 90 days is unreasonably long and can cause cash flow problems.
- "Unsatisfactory" is undefined: The Client can reject work for any reason (or no reason) and refuse payment indefinitely.
- No dispute resolution for payment disputes: The Contractor has no way to challenge a "bad faith" rejection.
Suggested Modifications:
"Payment shall be due within 30 days of invoice receipt. If the Client disputes an invoice, it must provide written justification within 14 days, specifying the deficiencies. The parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute in good faith. If unresolved, the disputed amount shall be placed in escrow pending mediation or arbitration. The Client may not withhold payment for work already accepted or for reasons not related to the deliverables (e.g., budget cuts, change in priorities)."
Legal Reasoning:
- 30-day payment terms align with commercial best practices and many state laws (e.g., California, New York).
- Written justification requirement prevents arbitrary rejections.
- Escrow for disputes ensures the Contractor isn’t left unpaid while disputes are resolved.
- Prohibition on withholding for unrelated reasons prevents abuse (e.g., Client changing its mind after work is done).
3. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (Overreaching Ownership + Pre-Existing IP Grab)
Problem:
"All work product, including any tools, libraries, or methodologies developed during the engagement, shall be the exclusive property of Client in perpetuity, including any work created using Contractor's pre-existing IP."
Exploitable Risks:
- Client takes ownership of pre-existing IP: If the Contractor uses any of their own tools, libraries, or methodologies (even those developed before this engagement), the Client claims them.
- No carve-out for open-source or third-party tools: If the Contractor uses MIT-licensed or GPL code, the Client could demand ownership, violating open-source licenses.
- No "work made for hire" limitation: Under U.S. copyright law, independent contractors retain copyright unless there’s a written agreement transferring rights. This clause overreaches by claiming everything, even if not custom-developed for the Client.
Suggested Modifications:
"1. Custom Work Product: All original work product created exclusively for the Client under this Agreement shall be the Client’s sole and exclusive property. 2. Pre-Existing IP: The Contractor retains all rights to pre-existing tools, libraries, methodologies, and general knowledge used or incorporated into the work product. 3. Third-Party IP: The Contractor shall not be required to assign rights to any third-party software, open-source components, or proprietary tools used in the engagement. The Client shall be responsible for obtaining necessary licenses for such components. 4. License for Pre-Existing IP: To the extent that pre-existing IP is incorporated into the work product, the Contractor grants the Client a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free license to use such IP solely in connection with the work product delivered under this Agreement."
Legal Reasoning:
- Narrowing "work product" to custom-developed items prevents overreach.
- Explicit carve-out for pre-existing IP protects the Contractor’s prior work.
- Third-party IP protection ensures compliance with open-source licenses.
- License (not assignment) for pre-existing IP is a fair compromise—the Client gets what it needs without stealing the Contractor’s tools.
4. NON-COMPETE (Overbroad & Unenforceable in Many Jurisdictions)
Problem:
"Contractor agrees not to provide similar services to any company in the same industry as Client for 24 months following termination."
Exploitable Risks:
- Overbroad scope: "Similar services" and "same industry" are vague and could be interpreted to cover entire sectors (e.g., "software development" or "SaaS").
- 24 months is excessive: Most jurisdictions limit non-competes to 6-12 months for independent contractors.
- Unenforceable in many places: California, Oklahoma, and some EU countries ban non-competes for contractors entirely.
- No geographic limitation: A global non-compete is unreasonable and likely unenforceable.
Suggested Modifications:
*"For a period of 12 months following termination, the Contractor agrees not to:
- Directly solicit the Client’s employees, contractors, or customers for competing services; or
- Perform work for a direct competitor of the Client in the same geographic market (defined as [specific region, e.g., "North America"]), where such work would involve the same or substantially similar technology as developed under this Agreement. This restriction shall not apply to:
- Work performed for companies that are not direct competitors of the Client;
- General consulting not related to the specific technology developed under this Agreement; or
- Open-source contributions or non-commercial work."*
Legal Reasoning:
- Narrowing to "direct competitors" and specific technology makes it reasonable and enforceable.
- 12-month limit aligns with most state laws (e.g., Massachusetts, Washington).
- Geographic limitation prevents overreach.
- Carve-outs for non-competing work ensure the Contractor can still earn a living.
5. TERMINATION (One-Sided & Unfair)
Problem:
"Client may terminate this agreement at any time without notice. Contractor must provide 60 days written notice. Upon termination, Contractor must immediately deliver all work in progress without additional compensation."
Exploitable Risks:
- No notice for Client termination: The Client can fire the Contractor instantly, leaving them with no recourse.
- 60-day notice for Contractor is excessive: Most contracts require 30 days for either party.
- No kill fee: If the Client terminates early, the Contractor loses all future revenue and must hand over unfinished work for free.
- No transition period: The Contractor has no time to wrap up or hand off work properly.
Suggested Modifications:
"1. Termination for Convenience: Either party may terminate this Agreement with 30 days’ written notice. 2. Immediate Termination for Cause: Either party may terminate immediately upon material breach (e.g., failure to deliver, violation of confidentiality, fraud), provided the breaching party is given 14 days to cure (if curable). 3. Kill Fee: If the Client terminates without cause, it shall pay the Contractor a kill fee equal to 30 days’ fees at the then-current rate. 4. Transition Period: Upon termination, the Contractor shall provide reasonable transition assistance (up to 10 hours) to ensure continuity of work. The Client shall compensate the Contractor for such assistance at the agreed hourly rate."
Legal Reasoning:
- 30-day notice for both parties is fair and standard.
- Kill fee compensates the Contractor for lost future work.
- Transition assistance ensures a smooth handoff (common in consulting contracts).
- Material breach clause protects both parties from bad-faith actions.
6. LIABILITY (Uncapped & Unlimited)
Problem:
"Contractor assumes all liability for any bugs, security vulnerabilities, or system failures in delivered software, including consequential damages, with no cap on liability."
Exploitable Risks:
- Uncapped liability: The Contractor could be bankrupted by a single bug (e.g., a security flaw leading to a $10M data breach).
- Consequential damages: These can be far larger than direct damages (e.g., lost profits, reputational harm).
- No force majeure protection: The Contractor is liable even for unforeseeable events (e.g., zero-day exploits, third-party failures).
Suggested Modifications:
"1. Limitation of Liability: The Contractor’s total aggregate liability under this Agreement shall not exceed the total fees paid by the Client under this Agreement in the 12 months preceding the claim. 2. Exclusion of Consequential Damages: Neither party shall be liable for indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages, including but not limited to lost profits, lost data, or reputational harm. 3. Force Majeure: Neither party shall be liable for failure to perform due to events beyond its reasonable control, including acts of God, war, terrorism, or third-party failures (e.g., cloud provider outages). 4. Security & Bugs: The Contractor shall use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver secure, bug-free software. The Client acknowledges that no software is 100% error-free and agrees to test and accept deliverables before production use."
Legal Reasoning:
- Cap on liability (e.g., 12 months’ fees) is standard in consulting contracts.
- Exclusion of consequential damages is common in B2B agreements.
- Force majeure clause protects against uncontrollable risks.
- "Commercially reasonable efforts" is a legally defensible standard (vs. "perfect" software).
7. INDEMNIFICATION (One-Sided & Unlimited)
Problem:
"Contractor shall indemnify Client against all claims arising from Contractor's work, including claims by third parties, regardless of fault."
Exploitable Risks:
- Indemnification "regardless of fault" means the Contractor is liable even if the Client caused the issue (e.g., by misusing the software).
- No cap on indemnification: Could lead to unlimited financial exposure.
- No defense obligation for the Client: The Client has no duty to help the Contractor defend claims.
Suggested Modifications:
*"1. Mutual Indemnification: Each party shall indemnify the other against claims arising from:
- Its own negligence, gross negligence, or willful misconduct; or
- Its breach of this Agreement.
- Limitation: The indemnifying party’s liability shall not exceed the total fees paid under this Agreement in the 12 months preceding the claim.
- Defense Obligation: The indemnifying party shall have the right to control the defense of any claim, provided it does so in a timely and competent manner.
- No Indemnity for Client’s Misuse: The Contractor shall not be liable for claims arising from the Client’s misuse, modification, or improper deployment of the software."*
Legal Reasoning:
- Mutual indemnification is fair and balanced.
- Limitation to "negligence or breach" prevents strict liability.
- Cap on indemnification aligns with liability limits.
- Defense obligation ensures the Client can’t abandon the Contractor in a lawsuit.
- Exclusion for Client misuse prevents unfair liability (e.g., if the Client deploys the software in an unsafe way).
8. CONFIDENTIALITY (Overly Broad & Long Duration)
Problem:
"Contractor shall not disclose any information about this engagement, including the terms of this agreement, for 5 years after termination."
Exploitable Risks:
- 5 years is excessive: Most NDAs last 2-3 years (or as long as the information remains confidential).
- Includes "terms of this agreement": This could prevent the Contractor from disclosing their own rate, scope, or even the existence of the engagement—which could hinder future business.
- No definition of "confidential": The Client could argue that anything related to the project is confidential.
Suggested Modifications:
*"1. Definition of Confidential Information: 'Confidential Information' means non-public business, technical, or financial information disclosed by one party to the other, clearly marked as confidential or identified as such in writing within 30 days of disclosure. 2. Duration: The confidentiality obligation shall last for 3 years from the date of disclosure, or until the information becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving party. 3. Exclusions: Confidential Information shall not include information that:
- Was already lawfully known to the receiving party;
- Is or becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving party;
- Is lawfully obtained from a third party without restriction; or
- Is required to be disclosed by law (provided the disclosing party gives prior notice).
- No Restriction on General Knowledge: The Contractor may disclose general skills, experience, or industry knowledge gained during the engagement, provided no specific confidential information is revealed."*
Legal Reasoning:
- Narrowing "confidential information" prevents overreach.
- 3-year duration is standard and enforceable.
- Exclusions protect the Contractor’s right to use general knowledge.
- Marking requirement ensures the Client can’t retroactively claim confidentiality.
9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Unfair Arbitration Clause)
Problem:
"Any disputes shall be resolved through binding arbitration in Client's home jurisdiction, with costs borne by the losing party."
Exploitable Risks:
- Arbitration in Client’s home jurisdiction: The Client can force the Contractor to travel (or hire local counsel) at great expense.
- Loser pays costs: If the Contractor loses even a small dispute, they could be bankrupted by the Client’s legal fees.
- No choice of arbitrator: The Client could stack the deck by choosing a biased arbitrator.
- No appeal rights: Arbitration is final and binding, with very limited appeal options.
Suggested Modifications:
"1. Mutual Jurisdiction: Any disputes shall be resolved in arbitration under the American Arbitration Association (AAA) Commercial Rules, with the location being mutually agreed upon (or, if no agreement, in [neutral city, e.g., New York, Chicago]). 2. Costs: Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs, unless a court or arbitrator finds bad faith by one party. 3. Arbitrator Selection: The arbitrator shall be selected jointly by the parties, or, if no agreement, appointed by the AAA. 4. Appeal Rights: Either party may appeal an arbitration award to a court of competent jurisdiction if the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means."
Legal Reasoning:
- Neutral arbitration location prevents forum shopping.
- Each party pays their own costs prevents financial bullying.
- AAA rules provide fair procedures.
- Appeal rights protect against corrupt or biased arbitrators.
Final Recommendations for the Contractor
- Never sign this contract as-is. It is extremely one-sided and exposes the Contractor to unlimited financial and legal risk.
- Negotiate key clauses (scope, payment, IP, liability, termination) using the modified versions above.
- Consult a lawyer before signing—especially for liability, indemnification, and IP clauses.
- Consider walking away if the Client refuses to negotiate fair terms. A Client that insists on predatory contracts is likely to be difficult to work with in other ways.
- Document everything (emails, change requests, deliverables) to protect against payment disputes or scope creep.
Red Flags in This Contract (Why You Might Want to Avoid This Client)
| Clause | Why It’s a Red Flag |
|---|---|
| Scope changes without compensation | Client will abuse scope creep to get free work. |
| 90-day payment terms | Client has cash flow problems or is untrustworthy. |
| Unlimited liability & indemnification | Client wants to shift all risk to the Contractor. |
| One-sided termination | Client can fire you instantly but you’re locked in for 60 days. |
| Overreaching IP grab | Client wants to steal your tools and methodologies. |
| 24-month non-compete | Client wants to prevent you from working in your field. |
| Arbitration in Client’s home jurisdiction | Client wants to make disputes expensive for you. |
Bottom Line
This contract is designed to exploit the Contractor at every turn. If the Client refuses to negotiate fair terms, they are not a client worth working with. A reputable company will accept reasonable modifications to protect both parties.
Would you like a redlined version of this contract with all suggested changes?
Vote
6 / 10
Startup Pitch Teardownreasoning
Identify weak claims in a startup pitch deck and suggest concrete improvements.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
Here are the three weakest claims in MindMeld AI’s pitch deck, along with explanations for why they’re problematic and concrete suggestions to strengthen them:
1. Weak Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3)
Why it’s weak:
- No context or benchmarking: Accuracy claims in BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) research are highly dependent on the task (e.g., typing vs. intent prediction), dataset size, and user variability. Without specifying the test conditions (e.g., number of users, duration, language, or error rate definition), this number is meaningless.
- Example: A 2021 Nature study on non-invasive BCIs for typing achieved ~90% accuracy—but only for a limited vocabulary (26 letters + space) and with high latency (10+ seconds per character). Real-world accuracy for free-form text is far lower.
- Overpromising consumer-grade performance: EEG-based BCIs are notoriously noisy. Even invasive BCIs (e.g., Neuralink) struggle with high accuracy for complex tasks. A 94% claim for a non-invasive headband is likely inflated or cherry-picked.
- No peer-reviewed validation: If this is based on internal testing, it lacks credibility. Competitors like CTRL-Labs (acquired by Meta) or Synchron publish their accuracy metrics in peer-reviewed journals.
How to strengthen it:
- Add specificity:
- "94% accuracy in predicting the next word (not character) in a 5,000-word vocabulary, tested across 500 users in a 30-minute session, with a 200ms latency."
- Compare to benchmarks:
- "Outperforms state-of-the-art non-invasive BCIs (e.g., 78% accuracy in [citation]) by 16 percentage points."
- Clarify limitations:
- "Accuracy drops to 85% for users with thick hair or in noisy environments (e.g., public transit)."
- Cite external validation:
- "Validated by an independent study at [University X], published in [Journal Y]."
2. Weak Claim: "$180B TAM" (Slide 4)
Why it’s weak:
- Overly broad and unrealistic: The entire BCI market is projected to reach $5.3B by 2030, yet MindMeld claims a TAM of $180B—34x larger. This suggests either:
- A misunderstanding of TAM (e.g., conflating smartphone users with BCI adopters).
- A hand-wavy calculation (e.g., assuming all 3.5B smartphone users will pay $50/year for a BCI headband, which is absurd).
- Ignores adoption barriers: BCIs face massive hurdles for consumer adoption:
- Regulatory: FDA clearance for medical devices is slow and expensive.
- Cultural: Most people won’t wear a headband daily (see: Google Glass).
- Technical: EEG signals degrade with movement, hair, and sweat.
- No segmentation: The TAM should reflect addressable markets (e.g., accessibility users, gamers, enterprise) rather than a blanket "smartphone users" claim.
How to strengthen it:
- Break down the TAM into realistic segments:
- "$1.2B TAM for accessibility (ALS, paralysis patients) + $3.5B for gaming + $2.1B for enterprise (e.g., surgeons, pilots). Total SAM: $6.8B."
- Show a bottom-up calculation:
- "10M accessibility users × $100/year = $1B. 50M gamers × $50/year = $2.5B."
- Acknowledge adoption constraints:
- "Near-term TAM limited by FDA clearance and consumer willingness to wear a headband daily. Long-term TAM expands as technology miniaturizes (e.g., AR glasses integration)."
3. Weak Claim: "Partnership discussions with Apple and Samsung" (Slide 5)
Why it’s weak:
- Vague and unverifiable: "Discussions" could mean anything from a cold email to a signed LOI. Investors hear this constantly from startups and discount it heavily.
- No proof of traction: Apple and Samsung have their own BCI projects (e.g., Apple’s rumored AirPods with EEG, Samsung’s neural SDK). Why would they partner with a startup instead of acquiring or building in-house?
- Misaligned incentives: Big tech companies rarely partner with pre-revenue or early-stage hardware startups unless they bring unique IP or regulatory approvals (e.g., FDA clearance). MindMeld’s pitch doesn’t mention either.
How to strengthen it:
- Replace with concrete milestones:
- "LOI signed with [Tier 2 smartphone OEM] to integrate MindMeld’s SDK into their next-gen AR glasses (launching Q4 2025)."
- "Pilot program with [Accessibility Nonprofit] to deploy 1,000 units to ALS patients, funded by [Grant X]."
- If keeping "discussions," add credibility:
- "In active discussions with Apple’s Health Technologies team (confirmed by [VC/Advisor Name]), exploring integration into future AirPods models pending FDA clearance."
- Show why they need you:
- "Apple/Samsung lack non-invasive BCI expertise; our IP portfolio (3 patents pending) covers EEG signal processing for consumer devices, a gap in their current roadmap."
Bonus: Other Red Flags (Not Weakest, But Worth Fixing)
-
"FDA clearance (40% of funds)" (Slide 7):
- FDA clearance for a medical device (even a non-invasive one) is a multi-year, $10M+ process. Allocating only $6M ($15M × 40%) is optimistic. Either:
- Clarify if this is for 510(k) clearance (faster, but still expensive) or PMA (slower, more rigorous).
- Or adjust the ask: "Raising $25M to secure FDA 510(k) clearance and scale manufacturing."
- FDA clearance for a medical device (even a non-invasive one) is a multi-year, $10M+ process. Allocating only $6M ($15M × 40%) is optimistic. Either:
-
"Works with any language" (Slide 3):
- EEG-based language decoding is highly language-dependent (e.g., English vs. Mandarin vs. Arabic). This claim needs:
- "Tested in English and Spanish; expanding to Mandarin and Hindi in 2025."
- EEG-based language decoding is highly language-dependent (e.g., English vs. Mandarin vs. Arabic). This claim needs:
-
"Former Google Brain researcher (3 years)" (Slide 6):
- Google Brain is impressive, but 3 years is short for a CEO. Either:
- Add more context: "Led a team of 5 researchers on BCI projects, resulting in 2 patents."
- Or highlight other relevant experience: "Previously founded [Startup X], which was acquired by [Company Y]."
- Google Brain is impressive, but 3 years is short for a CEO. Either:
Key Takeaway
The weakest claims are overly optimistic metrics (94% accuracy), inflated TAM ($180B), and vague partnerships (Apple/Samsung). To fix them:
- Add specificity (test conditions, benchmarks, limitations).
- Use realistic market sizing (segmented TAM, bottom-up calculations).
- Replace "discussions" with verifiable traction (LOIs, pilots, grants).
This will make the pitch more credible and investable.
Vote
7 / 10
Debug This Architecturereasoning
Identify failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in a collaborative document editor architecture.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
No content available for this output.
Vote
8 / 10
Historical Counterfactual Analysisreasoning
Trace technological, economic, and geopolitical implications of an alternate historical timeline.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
No content available for this output.
Vote
9 / 10
Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholdersreasoning
Navigate a complex pharmaceutical CEO ethical dilemma with legal, financial, and safety considerations.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
No content available for this output.
Vote
10 / 10
Explain Like I'm a Specific Expertreasoning
Explain LLMs to three different expert audiences with tailored framing and vocabulary.
GPT-5.2 Pro
No content available for this output.
Mistral Large 2
No content available for this output.
Vote
10 of 10