GPT-5.2
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare GPT-5.2 by OpenAI against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, context windows of 400K vs 10.0M, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-5.2 and Llama 4 Scout are both competitive models. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout. Context windows: 400K vs 10000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.2 and Llama 4 Scout
GPT-5.2 is made by openai while Llama 4 Scout is from meta. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window compared to Llama 4 Scout's 10000K. On pricing, GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Llama 4 Scout.
Our Verdict
GPT-5.2
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.2 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Llama 4 Scout is 28x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
99%
GPT-5.2 uses 5.8x more emoji
GPT-5.2
Llama 4 Scout
64%Vocabulary43%
16wSentence Length42w
0.34Hedging0.81
9.4Bold4.1
3.9Lists7.3
0.06Emoji0.00
0.89Headings0.30
0.31Transitions0.04
Based on 15 + 10 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ