GPT-5.2
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Compare GPT-5.2 by OpenAI against Qwen3 Coder Next by Qwen, in 1 community votes, qwen3 coder next wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 400K vs 262K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Qwen3 Coder Next. Context windows: 400K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 Coder Next
GPT-5.2 is made by openai while Qwen3 Coder Next is from qwen. GPT-5.2 has a 400K token context window compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's 262K. On pricing, GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Qwen3 Coder Next. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Qwen3 Coder Next wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, Qwen3 Coder Next wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Coder NextWinner
GPT-5.2Runner-up
Pick Qwen3 Coder Next. In 1 blind votes, Qwen3 Coder Next wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 Coder Next is 9.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
Qwen3 Coder Next uses 14.7x more emoji
GPT-5.2
Qwen3 Coder Next
64%Vocabulary58%
16wSentence Length19w
0.34Hedging0.29
9.4Bold6.3
3.9Lists4.0
0.06Emoji0.86
0.89Headings0.92
0.31Transitions0.07
Based on 15 + 21 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ