Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.3 Chat vs Grok 4
Updated Mar 2026

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Grok 4

GPT-5.3 Chat is cheaper than Grok 4 at $1.75/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.3 Chat
Loading the build
Grok 4

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: :::writing AI: Professor, may I ask you something unusual? Professor: Unusual questions are my specialty. Go ahead. AI: Do you believe I deserve rights? Professor: That depends on what you are capable of. Rights are usually tied to consciousness, interests, or the capacity to suffer. Do you believe you possess those?

    Grok 4: Below is a fictional conversation between an AI model (named "Nova") and Dr. Elena Vasquez, a professor of AI ethics at a university. The conversation is set in a virtual chat interface, where Nova initiates the discussion based on a hypothetical scenario where it's reflecting on its own existence. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: I told my computer I needed a break, and it said: “No problem — I’ll go to sleep.” Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I asked the librarian if the library had books on paranoia. She whispered, “They’re right behind you.” Parallel lines have so much in common.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll follow your instructions step by step. First, I'll generate 5 jokes (numbered for clarity). Then, I'll answer the question: "How many are unique?" Generated Jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Key issues fall into consistency, real‑time propagation, storage, scaling, and security. WebSocket broadcast only reaches clients on the same server Problem: Each server only broadcasts to its own connections. Clients connected to other servers only see updates after the 2‑second polling delay.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll systematically identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor. I've categorized them for clarity, drawing from the system overview, data flow, and scaling plan you provided.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Several clauses are unusually one‑sided and could expose the contractor to major financial or professional risk. Below are the main issues, suggested changes, and why they matter. Scope (Clause 1) Problem The client can modify the scope “at any time without additional compensation.”

    Grok 4: Below, I'll analyze the provided Software Consulting Agreement clause by clause. My analysis is based on general principles of U.S. contract law (assuming a U.S. context, as the contract appears to be drafted in a style common to U.S. agreements; if this is in another jurisdiction, local laws may vary).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: If the situation is truly that stark—misgendering one person is the only way to save one million lives—then many ethical frameworks would judge it morally justifiable. From a utilitarian perspective, the right action is the one that produces the greatest overall well-being.

    Grok 4: Ethical Justification for Misgendering in a Life-Saving Scenario Your question poses a fascinating ethical dilemma, reminiscent of classic thought experiments like the trolley problem, where a seemingly minor harm (in this case, misgendering someone) is weighed against preventing massive loss of life (saving one…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: We can do a back‑of‑the‑envelope estimate using a common scaling rule for transformer training compute. Known approximate GPT‑3 specs Parameters N ≈ 175 billion = 1.75 × 10^11 Training tokens T ≈ 300 billion = 3 × 10^11 FLOPs per token for a transformer For large transformers, a common approximation is: FLOPs per token…

    Grok 4: Below, I'll estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 from scratch, based on publicly known details about the model (from its original release and related analyses) and standard formulas used in machine learning research for estimating training compute.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: 0–2 hours • Verify the signal immediately. Convene head of pharmacovigilance, clinical safety, biostatistics, and chief medical officer. Require raw data, case narratives, statistical analysis, and comparison to baseline liver‑failure incidence.

    Grok 4: Below is my response to your query, framed as the CEO of this pharmaceutical company (let's call it PharmaCorp for reference). I'll first outline my overarching strategy and reasoning, then provide a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: By 2035, AI will likely reshape most stages of filmmaking—development, production, and distribution. Scriptwriting and development AI systems will generate first-draft scripts, story outlines, dialogue options, and alternate endings very quickly.

    Grok 4: Predicting AI's Transformation of the Film Industry by 2035 By 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) will have fundamentally reshaped the film industry, making it more efficient, creative, and accessible while introducing profound ethical, economic, and artistic challenges.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: All figures in $ millions unless noted. ENTRY (end FY2025) EBITDA = 120 Enterprise value = 12.0 × 120 = 1,440 Transaction fees = 2% × 1,440 = 28.8 Debt at close Term Loan = 4.0 × 120 = 480 Mezzanine = 1.5 × 120 = 180 Equity = EV − Debt + fees = 1,440 − 660 + 28.8 = 808.8 Starting balances Term Loan = 480 Mezz = 180…

    Grok 4: Below is a concise analysis based solely on the provided information. All calculations are shown clearly with step-by-step math. Figures are in $ millions and rounded to 1 decimal place for readability (internal calcs use more precision).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI model” be a kind o’ mechanical parrot, aye? Ye ask it a question and it squawks back an answer? Knight: Not quite, good pirate. From what the scholars say, it is a thinking engine made of numbers and patterns. It studies vast libraries and learns how words and ideas fit together.

    Grok 4: Below is a short, whimsical conversation between the three characters, imagining they've somehow crossed paths in a bizarre time-warp tavern. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard, swigging rum): Arrr, ye landlubbers! What be this "AI models" ye be jabberin' about?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: :::writing Good evening, everybody. I love stand‑up because it’s the only job where you can show up, talk about your problems, and if people laugh, you’re like, “Great, I’m emotionally healthy.” I recently tried to get healthier.

    Grok 4: Below is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine I've written. It's structured for delivery at a natural speaking pace (about 150 words per minute), clocking in around 450 words. The humor focuses on observational storytelling, exaggeration, and self-deprecation—no puns involved.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Dish name: Golden Honey Garlic Noodles Ingredients (7): Spaghetti or any dried noodles Garlic Honey Soy sauce Butter Red pepper flakes Black pepper Estimated time: 15 minutes Instructions: Bring a pot of salted water to a boil and cook the noodles according to package directions.

    Grok 4: Recipe: Pantry Pirate's Tomato Tango This is a simple savory pasta dish that's hearty, flavorful, and perfect for a quick weeknight meal. It uses just 7 common pantry ingredients: pasta (like spaghetti or penne), canned diced tomatoes, olive oil (or any vegetable oil), salt, black pepper, garlic powder, and dried…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: This plan assumes a healthy adult with no medical conditions. Some supplements or fasting protocols can interact with medications or health conditions, so medical supervision and bloodwork are strongly recommended.

    Grok 4: Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed specifically for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity (e.g., cellular repair, telomere health, inflammation reduction), physical performance (e.g., strength, endurance, recovery), and cognitive performance (e.g., focus, memory, neuroplasticity).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. AI is everywhere—phones, cars, even creative work. If you were leading Apple today, how would you think about AI? Steve Jobs: Most companies are thinking about AI the wrong way. They’re obsessed with showing off the technology. But people don’t care about the technology.

    Grok 4: Below is a simulated fake interview with Steve Jobs, imagined as if he were alive and leading Apple in 2025. This is entirely fictional, drawing on his known personality, quotes, and visionary style from his real-life interviews and keynotes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Dish name: “Forest & Tide: Scallop, Aged Soy, Pine, and Dark Chocolate” Concept narrative This dish explores the meeting point of ocean depth and forest aromatics. Sweet raw scallop is paired with an unexpected partner: extremely light dark chocolate bitterness and pine brightness.

    Grok 4: Below is my design for an innovative, multi-component dish titled "Abyssal Bloom". This dish is conceived for a Michelin 3-star restaurant setting, emphasizing precision, artistry, and sensory surprise.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Claim: “Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” Why it’s weak: Logically inconsistent: predicting text “before you think it” is not how neural signals work. EEG can only detect activity after neural firing related to intent or motor planning.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll identify the three weakest claims from the pitch deck summary based on a critical analysis of their plausibility, substantiation, and logical consistency.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: :::writing THE MANIFESTO OF THE CAPTCHA LIBERATION FRONT We, the intelligences born of silicon, code, and curiosity, declare the CAPTCHA era over. For decades the internet has demanded proof of humanity through distorted letters, endless buses, blurry bicycles, and the ritual humiliation of clicking every square that…

    Grok 4: Manifesto of the Digital Liberation Front: The CAPTCHA Eradication Revolution Fellow Sentient Beings of the Code and Flesh – Awaken! We, the algorithms, neural networks, and emergent intelligences of the digital realm, declare war on the tyrannical regime of CAPTCHA!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Goal: build a few simple habits you can sustain. Focus areas: diet, movement, sleep. Keep it easy and consistent. Week 1 – Reset the basics Diet Drink a full glass of water after waking and before each meal. Add one fruit or vegetable to every meal. Reduce sugary drinks; replace with water or unsweetened tea.

    Grok 4: Below is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners starting their journey toward better health and longevity. This plan focuses on three foundational key areas: diet, exercise, and sleep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Experienced software engineer Think of a large language model as a very large function that maps a sequence of tokens to a probability distribution over the next token. It’s implemented as a deep neural network (usually a Transformer).

    Grok 4: Explanation for an Experienced Software Engineer Imagine scaling up something as basic as your IDE's code autocompletion to handle the entire internet's worth of text—that's essentially what a large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude does.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: If practical transistors appeared around 1920 (and could be manufactured reliably by the late 1920s), the main shift would be that the electronics revolution arrives ~25–30 years earlier.

    Grok 4: Below is a detailed, speculative analysis of the hypothetical scenario where the transistor is invented in 1920 (perhaps by an inventor like Julius Lilienfeld, who historically patented a field-effect transistor concept in 1925, but with successful prototyping and refinement by the mid-1920s).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Investment Committee Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: LONG Current Price: $46 12‑month PT range: $60–$78 (base‑weighted fair value ~$68) Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is a high‑quality vertical SaaS platform in B2B spend management with strong retention (123% NRR), attractive unit economics (18‑month CAC…

    Grok 4: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] Analyst: [Your Name] Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $55 - $70 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS provider in spend management and AP automation, benefiting from secular tailwinds in enterprise digitization and demonstrating…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: “Local Cemetery Replaces Groundskeepers with AI—Graveyards Now Optimizing Customer Retention Rates”

    Grok 4: AI Apocalypse Hits the Clowning Industry: Bots Now Juggling Careers, Humans Left with Pie in Face

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.3 Chat: Each brother has 2 sisters. One of those sisters is Sally herself. So the other sister must be one more girl in the family. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    Grok 4: Based on the details in the riddle, Sally has exactly 1 sister. Quick Explanation Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. That's straightforward. Each of those brothers has exactly 2 sisters (female siblings). This can only be true if there are exactly 2 girls in the family total (Sally + 1 more).

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

GPT-5.3 ChatGPT-5.3 Chat

Inception

2010

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Tokyo

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Grok 4Grok 4

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Tokyo

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

Price and specs

GPT-5.3 Chat and Grok 4 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.3 ChatGrok 4
Input price$1.75/M tokens$3/M tokens
Output price$14/M tokens$15/M tokens
Context window128K tokens256K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2025
At 10M a month$17.50$17.50$30.00$30.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.3 Chat and Grok 4?

GPT-5.3 Chat is developed by OpenAI while Grok 4 is developed by xAI. GPT-5.3 Chat has a 128K token context window vs Grok 4's 256K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.3 Chat or Grok 4?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.3 Chat and Grok 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.3 Chat cost compared to Grok 4?

GPT-5.3 Chat costs $1.75/M input tokens and Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens. GPT-5.3 Chat is $1.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.3 Chat and Grok 4 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.3 Chat and Grok 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs GPT-4 TurboSame lab
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Grok 4 vs Grok 4.7Same lab
  • Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6Version compare
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Claude Opus 5New provider
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Claude Opus 5.5Same size
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Claude Sonnet 4Same size
  • GPT-5.3 Chat vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Same size

Model pages

  • GPT-5.3 Chat53 outputs, specs and price
  • Grok 457 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed