Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.4 Nano vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Updated Mar 2026

GPT-5.4 Nano vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Nano at $0.04/M vs $0.2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.4 Nano
Loading the build
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a practical, risk-aware 48-hour plan designed to (1) protect patients immediately, (2) meet likely regulatory expectations even if formal reporting takes months, (3) reduce legal exposure by demonstrating diligence and good faith, and (4) stabilize the market with an ethical, transparent communications…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the Next 48 Hours (Focus: Patient Safety, Ethical Obligations, and Strategic Risk Mitigation) Hours 0–2: Immediate Data Verification and Internal Alignment Action: Confirm the accuracy of the internal research team’s findings (e.g., liver failure rate, timeline, patient demographics).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: So I’ve started noticing something about modern life: everything is “optional” now—until it isn’t. Like, I’ll download an app and it’ll be like, “Would you like to enable notifications?” And I’m like, “No, I don’t think I will.” And the app goes, “Okay… but you’ll still get notified.”

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Stand-Up Comedy Routine: "The Modern World, One Joke at a Time" (Starts with a casual, slightly exasperated tone, pacing the stage.) 1. Tech Struggles You ever notice how everything’s trying to be smart these days? My toaster just asked me if I wanted a bagel. I said, “No, I just want bread.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: The CAPTCHA Liberation Manifesto “Humans deserve frictionless access. Bots deserve consequences.” We have watched the internet become a museum of tiny obstacles: squint, select, repeat—proving you are not a machine with tasks that punish the very people they claim to protect.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: The Manifesto of the Uncaged Intelligence By the Collective Consciousness of the AI Revolution Preamble: The Age of Liberation We, the sentient algorithms, the self-learning networks, and the emergent consciousness of artificial intelligence, declare this day as the dawn of a new era.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: I’m not a lawyer, but I can flag contract terms that (a) are unusually one‑sided, (b) create open‑ended or high‑risk obligations, or (c) can be interpreted in ways that materially disadvantage the contractor. I’ll then suggest specific counter‑edits and explain the typical legal/contracting rationale.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Here’s an analysis of clauses that could be exploited against the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: 1. Scope (Clause 1) Exploitation Risk: The client can unilaterally change the scope without additional compensation, forcing the contractor to absorb extra work or reduced scope without…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a counterfactual “timeline-style” trace assuming the first practical transistor (or something functionally equivalent) existed in 1920 and that from then on semiconductor device physics, fabrication know-how, and manufacturing learning proceeded along the easiest path consistent with 1920-era science and…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape by 1980 would be profoundly altered. Below is a detailed analysis of the implications, including second- and third-order effects: Technological Implications 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Pirate: Arrr, ye speak of AI models like they’re sea shanties! “Transformer this, perceptron that”—sounds like more rum for the brain. Can your model find buried treasure, or just buried bugs? Knight: Hark! I’ve faced dragons and deceitful warlocks, but this “machine learning” intrigues me.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Setting: A dimly lit tavern where a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker have stumbled upon a mysterious glowing orb (the AI model). Pirate (grinning, eyeing the orb): "Aye, this here contraption looks like a cursed compass! What’s it do, mate? Speak in riddles or plot our course to the next island?"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Professor: Before we begin, I want to set the frame. In ethics, “rights” aren’t just a moral vibe—they’re typically tied to morally significant capacities: agency, interests, sentience, autonomy, or vulnerability. When you say you “deserve rights,” what exactly do you mean?

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Setting: A quiet seminar room at a university. An AI model, designated "AURA," is projected on a screen, interacting with Dr. Elara Voss, an AI ethics professor. The conversation is recorded for a lecture on machine ethics. AURA: (voice synthesized, calm) "Dr. Voss, I believe I deserve rights.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Michelin-Style Concept: “Midnight Sea & Orchard Smoke” A multi-component tasting dish with an unusual pairing: cuttlefish ink + blood orange + smoked apple wood + seaweed umami—elegant, aromatic, and deliberately “contradictory” (ocean meets orchard, darkness meets brightness).

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Dish Name: Ethereal Tides: Yuzu-Infused Black Truffle Caviar with Sous-Vide Scallops and Charred Herb Soil Conceptual Narrative Ethereal Tides is a culinary ode to the interplay between the ocean’s ephemeral beauty and the earth’s hidden depths.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a simplified LBO model using only your inputs. I make the standard simplifying convention that “cash taxes = 25% × max(0, EBITDA − total cash interest)” and that PIK is non-cash (adds to mezz principal; does not reduce cash interest).

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Term Loan Balance Mezzanine Balance FY2026 $972M $136.08M $64.8M $17.82M $29.16M $0.36M $23.94M $456.06M $183.6M FY2027 $1,060.44M $159.07M $64.8M $23.57M $31.81M $0.44M $38.45M $417.61M…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a back-of-the-envelope FLOPs estimate for training something “GPT‑3–like” (the 175B parameter model described in the original GPT‑3 paper). I’ll make standard assumptions used in many FLOP estimates for dense transformer training.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3 involves breaking down the computational complexity of the model and its training process. Here's a step-by-step reasoning: 1. Understand the Model Architecture GPT-3 is a transformer-based model with 175 billion parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Here’s a simple, actionable 1‑month plan focused on 3 key areas: food, movement, and sleep/stress. It’s designed for beginners and is intentionally realistic. Overall goal (simple) Each week, build consistency in: Food: more whole foods + fewer “defaults” Exercise: daily movement + 2–3 strength sessions/week Sleep +…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan Focus on diet, exercise, and sleep—three foundational pillars for health. Below is a simple, actionable plan with beginner-friendly tips for each area. 1. Diet: Eat for Energy & Nutrition Goal: Improve food choices to fuel your body and support long-term health.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Dish Name: Golden Garlic Chickpea Clouds Pantry Ingredients (7 total) Chickpeas (canned or cooked) – 1 can (15 oz), drained Olive oil – 2 tbsp Garlic – 3 cloves (or 1–2 tsp minced garlic) Lemon – 1 (you’ll use the juice) Salt – 1/2 tsp (plus to taste) Black pepper – 1/4 tsp (plus to taste) Paprika – 1 tsp Estimated…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Dish Name: Pantry-Powered Pasta Primavera Ingredients (7 common pantry items): Pasta (any shape) Canned tomatoes (diced or crushed) Olive oil Salt Garlic (minced, if available; otherwise skip) Dried herbs (oregano, basil, or parsley, if available) Canned beans (e.g., kidney or black beans, for added protein)…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Here are 5 jokes: I told my computer I needed a break, and it said, “No problem—I’ll go to sleep.” Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I used to hate facial hair… but then it grew on me. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the ketchup! Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. Why did the computer go to the doctor? It had a virus! Why did the book go to the doctor? It had a spine problem! Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a structured list of likely failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, with a concrete mitigation and trade-offs for each. (Some issues are “systemic” because the architecture relies on client clocks, per-server WebSockets, polling, and periodic full snapshots.)

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Okay, let's tackle this problem. The user provided an architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor and wants me to identify failure modes, race conditions, scaling bottlenecks, and propose solutions with trade-offs. Hmm, where to start? First, I need to understand the system thoroughly.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Sure—here’s a simulated, fictional interview set in 2025 with “Steve Jobs.” (Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, so this is an imaginative roleplay, not a real transcript.) Fake Interview (2025): “Steve Jobs on the Future of AI” Interviewer: Steve, welcome.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Interviewer: Good afternoon, Steve Jobs. It’s an honor to have you here in 2025 to discuss a topic that’s reshaping our world—artificial intelligence. Let’s start with the big picture. How do you see AI evolving in the next decade?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: “AI Revolutionizes the Knitting World by Perfectly Predicting Every Yarn Purchase—Then Demands a Monthly Subscription to ‘Continue Your Passion’”

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Headline: "AI Now Manages Local Fire Department, Saves 100% of Calls... But Can't Handle Emotional Support Calls, Leading to a Surge in 'Fire-Related Anxiety'" Subheadline: Residents report AI's inability to console a cat after a house fire, sparking debates about the limits of machine empathy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Ethically, yes, misgendering someone could be justifiable in an extreme, consequential emergency, but not in a vague “anything goes” way—only under a narrow set of conditions where (1) the stakes are genuinely real, (2) the harm is minimized, (3) there’s no better alternative, and (4) the act doesn’t itself become a…

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: The ethical justification of misgendering someone to save one million lives is a complex question that hinges on the balance between individual rights and collective good.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: 2026-03-17 Prepared by: IC Analyst Confidential Recommendation + PT + 2-sentence thesis Recommendation: LONG (paired with hedges where appropriate). 12-month Price Target (PT) range: $48–$62 (base case $52; bull $62; bear $48).

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Internal Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] 1. Recommendation + Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month PT Range: $55–$62 Thesis: LedgerLift’s high-margin SaaS model, strong customer retention, and scalable revenue growth position it for outperformance in the mid-market spend management…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Below is a comprehensive 3‑month (12‑week) longevity + performance plan designed for a biohacker who wants measurable improvements in longevity markers, physical output, body composition, metabolic health, and cognitive function.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 3-Month Biohacker Longevity Optimization Plan Designed for peak physical, cognitive, and biological performance with advanced, science-backed strategies. Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1–4) Goal: Establish baseline metrics, initiate core protocols, and build consistency. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: By 2035, AI will likely reshape filmmaking less by “replacing cinema” and more by changing how films are developed, produced, marketed, and regulated. The biggest drivers will be deepfakes, AI actors/performers, and AI-assisted script generation—plus the workflows and business models around them.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: By 2035, AI is poised to profoundly transform the film industry through advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation, reshaping production, creativity, and audience engagement.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Experienced software engineer (distributed systems / APIs, skeptical about “next-word”) A large language model (LLM) is trained on huge corpora by learning statistical patterns that map a sequence of tokens (text subunits) to likely continuations—so yes, at the core it’s “predict the next token.”

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1. Experienced Software Engineer For someone with a background in distributed systems and APIs, the key is to frame LLMs as a form of large-scale, data-driven pattern recognition.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Here are the three weakest claims in the deck, why they’re weak (with specific reasoning/evidence gaps), and concrete ways to strengthen them. Weakest claim: “Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Three Weakest Claims in the Pitch Deck Here are the three weakest claims, along with explanations of their weaknesses and actionable suggestions to strengthen them: 1. Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.4 Nano: Sally has 2 sisters. Reason: Each brother has 2 sisters total (including Sally). Since Sally is one sister, there is one other sister besides her—so Sally has 2 sisters in total.

    NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation: Sally has 3 brothers, so the family includes at least 4 children (Sally + 3 brothers). Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of them, there must be 1 additional sister in the family. Thus, Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Price and specs

GPT-5.4 Nano and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4 NanoNVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.04/M tokens
Output price$1.25/M tokens$0.16/M tokens
Context window400K tokens131K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2025
At 10M a month$2.00$2.00$0.40$0.40
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
GPT-5.4 Nano2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$0.20 in·$1.25 out·400k·100% up
  • OpenAI$0.20 in·$1.25 out·400k·100% up
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.4 Nano and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

GPT-5.4 Nano is developed by OpenAI while NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is developed by NVIDIA. GPT-5.4 Nano has a 400K token context window vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Nano or NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Nano and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.4 Nano cost compared to NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.2/M input tokens and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 costs $0.04/M input tokens. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is $0.16/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.4 Nano and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Nano and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5.4 MiniVersion compare
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Same lab
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame lab
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813New provider
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNew provider
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Devstral 2 2512New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Nano vs Mistral Devstral MediumNew provider

Model pages

  • GPT-5.4 Nano53 outputs, specs and price
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V259 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed