GPT OSS 120B is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Pro at $0.18/M vs $30/M input tokens.
Playable Mario level in one HTML file. The physics is the hard part.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.4 Pro: Dragon Pantry Peanut Noodles A fast, sweet-savory noodle dish made from 7 pantry staples. Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti 1/3 cup peanut butter 3 tbsp soy sauce 1 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1/4 tsp red pepper flakes Water for boiling/thinning the sauce doesn’t count.
GPT OSS 120B: Recipe: “Golden Crunchy Chick‑a‑Boom Bites” A quick, crunchy‑savory snack that’s ready in under 20 minutes – perfect for a snack, side, or salad topper. Ingredients (7 pantry staples) # Ingredient Quantity 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & rinsed) 1 ½ cups (≈1 ½ cans) 2 Olive oil (or any neutral oil) 2 Tbsp 3 Garlic powder…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-5.4 Pro: This architecture will work for a demo, but it has major correctness, latency, and security problems for a Google-Docs-like editor. Highest-risk flaws Client-clock last-write-wins will lose edits and can be gamed by bad clocks.
GPT OSS 120B: Below is a system‑level failure‑mode / race‑condition / scaling‑bottleneck map for the architecture you described, followed by a concrete mitigation (or redesign) for each item together with the main trade‑offs to consider.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GPT-5.4 Pro: This agreement is heavily client-favored. Every numbered clause has language that could be used against the contractor. Short version: I would not sign it without major redlines to Clauses 1–9, especially 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Below is a clause-by-clause review.
GPT OSS 120B: Below is a clause‑by‑clause risk analysis of the agreement you posted, followed by concrete, contractor‑friendly rewrite suggestions and the legal rationale behind each change. The goal is to bring the contract into a more balanced, commercially reasonable state while preserving the client’s legitimate interests.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a 12-week, high-performance longevity protocol designed for a healthy biohacker who wants to improve lifespan-relevant markers, physical performance, and cognitive output at the same time. Use it as a data-driven template, not dogma.
GPT OSS 120B: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Hacker” Blueprint Goal: Maximize lifespan‑related biomarkers while simultaneously boosting physical strength, cardiovascular fitness, and cognitive performance using the most up‑to‑date, evidence‑based bio‑hacking tools. ⚠️ Disclaimer – This plan is for educational purposes only.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a dish designed in the language of a contemporary 3-star tasting menu: precise, seasonal, technically layered, and centered on a pairing that feels surprising at first, then inevitable.
GPT OSS 120B: Dish Title: “Saffron‑Iced Sea‑Urchin Roulade with Dark‑Chocolate‑Miso Emulsion, Charred Lotus‑Root “Crisps”, Fermented Soy‑Kale Snow, and Yuzu‑Air” Conceptual Narrative At the intersection of the Pacific’s briny depth and the earth’s smoky, earthy heart, this dish tells a story of “the hidden tide beneath the forest…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-5.4 Pro: Most likely, a transistor invented in 1920 would move the electronics/computing frontier forward by about 10–15 years by 1980, not the full 27 years. Reason: the transistor alone is not enough; you also need high-purity materials, crystal growth, photolithography, test equipment, software, batteries, precision…
GPT OSS 120B: Executive Summary If a practical solid‑state transistor had been demonstrated in 1920 – twenty‑seven years before the Bell‑Labs breakthrough – the whole post‑World‑War‑I world would have been reshaped.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-5.4 Pro: The 3 weakest claims are the ones that are both most extraordinary and least well-supported. Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1) “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” This is the biggest credibility risk in the deck.
GPT OSS 120B: Below is a quick “triage” of the three statements that, if left unchanged, will most likely raise eyebrows (or a “no‑thanks”) from investors, VCs, and even a skeptical engineering board.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5.4 Pro: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month health and longevity plan built around 3 key areas: Nutrition Movement Recovery (sleep + stress) The goal is consistency, not perfection. Start small and make the habits easy enough to keep.
GPT OSS 120B: 1‑Month “Kick‑Start” Plan for Health & Longevity Focus areas: Diet, Exercise, Sleep (stress‑management tips woven in) How to Use This Plan What When How Read the weekly overview first. Day 1 of each week Set a tiny, measurable goal (e.g., “walk 10 min after dinner”).
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
GPT-5.4 Pro: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM less like a database of facts and more like a gigantic learned program that has been trained to compress the patterns of text, code, and conversations into its weights.
GPT OSS 120B: 1. The Software Engineer (API‑first, Distributed‑Systems Mindset) Think of a large language model (LLM) as a stateless microservice that receives a stream of tokens (the smallest lexical units) and returns a probability distribution over the next token.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-5.4 Pro: I do not wait. A credible, previously unlabeled risk of liver failure in a chronic-pain drug is a patient-safety crisis, a regulatory crisis, and a securities-disclosure issue at the same time.
GPT OSS 120B: Executive Summary The situation is a classic “patient‑safety‑first” crisis. The drug generates $2 B in revenue, but a life‑threatening adverse event (1 / 8 000 over 5 y) has been identified that was not disclosed in the label.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge: newer, bigger context window. GPT OSS 120B costs 225x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $30/M tokens | $0.18/M tokens |
| Output price | $180/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Aug 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $300 | $1.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by OpenAI but target different use cases. GPT-5.4 Pro has a 1.1M token context window vs GPT OSS 120B's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 18 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT OSS 120B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 18 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.4 Pro costs $30/M input tokens and GPT OSS 120B costs $0.18/M input tokens. GPT OSS 120B is $29.82/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT OSS 120B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.