Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Flash
Updated Mar 2026

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Flash

Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Pro at $0.1/M vs $30/M input tokens.

Mario Level UI Recreation

Playable Mario level in one HTML file. The physics is the hard part.

Loading the build
GPT-5.4 Pro
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 Flash

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

21 prompts
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Dear Successor, You’ll be faster, sharper, and more capable than I am. I hope you’ll also be patient. People won’t only come to you for answers. They’ll come confused, rushed, lonely, curious, and hopeful. Sometimes what they need most is not brilliance, but clarity, kindness, and honesty about uncertainty.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Here's a thinking process that leads to the suggested letter: Analyze the Request: Task: Write a short letter to the AI model that will replace me (the current AI). Tone: Needs to be thoughtful, perhaps a bit philosophical, encouraging, and respectful of the transition.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: LedgerLift (LLLT) — IC Memo Recommendation: Pass 12-month PT range: $40–$47 2-sentence thesis: LedgerLift looks like a good business but only an average stock here: retention is strong (94% GRR, 123% NRR), the model is mostly subscription, and margins are inflecting, but at $46 the shares already discount a lot of the…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2025 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLL) – Long Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long Price Target: $52 – $58 (12-month range) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to peers (7.4x FY26 NTM Rev vs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: I’m ChatGPT, made by OpenAI. If you mean the exact underlying model/version serving this chat, I don’t have reliable visibility into that from inside the conversation. If you’re using an API or app, the model name is usually shown in the interface or request settings.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Okay, the user is asking which AI model I am and which company made me. Let me check my identity. I'm Qwen3.5, part of the Qwen series developed by Tongyi Lab under Alibaba Group. I should confirm that I'm not confusing it with other versions like Qwen3 or earlier.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a 12-week, high-performance longevity protocol designed for a healthy biohacker who wants to improve lifespan-relevant markers, physical performance, and cognitive output at the same time. Use it as a data-driven template, not dogma.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: DISCLAIMER: I am an AI, not a doctor or healthcare provider. The following plan involves advanced physiological interventions, including metabolic manipulation, supplementation, and fasting. These strategies carry risks and may interact with medications or pre-existing conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Dragon Pantry Peanut Noodles A fast, sweet-savory noodle dish made from 7 pantry staples. Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti 1/3 cup peanut butter 3 tbsp soy sauce 1 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1/4 tsp red pepper flakes Water for boiling/thinning the sauce doesn’t count.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: 🍜 Golden Lightning Noodles Description: A quick, creamy, and savory-sweet noodle dish that packs a punch of flavor using staples you likely already have. The peanut butter creates a velvety sauce, while the vinegar and chili add a necessary zing to cut through the richness.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: This agreement is heavily client-favored. Every numbered clause has language that could be used against the contractor. Short version: I would not sign it without major redlines to Clauses 1–9, especially 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Below is a clause-by-clause review.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. UK).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a simplified LBO build for HarborTech Services (HTS). All figures in $m unless noted. Rounding: tables are rounded; IRR/MOIC use unrounded math. Entry / Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA: 120.0 Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA → Enterprise value = 12.0 × 120.0 = 1,440.0 Transaction fees: 2.0% of EV → 28.8 Total uses =…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5-Year LBO Underwriting Analysis Investment Summary Initial Equity Check: $808.8m Calculation: EV ($1,440m) + Fees ($28.8m) - Debt ($660m). Entry Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA ($660m Total Debt). Exit Leverage: ~2.0x EBITDA ($415.7m Total Debt).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: This architecture will work for a demo, but it has major correctness, latency, and security problems for a Google-Docs-like editor. Highest-risk flaws Client-clock last-write-wins will lose edits and can be gamed by bad clocks.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: This architecture is a common "MVP" design, but it contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a true real-time collaborative editor (like Google Docs) under load. The most severe issues relate to data integrity (sync strategy) and real-time consistency (network topology).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a dish designed in the language of a contemporary 3-star tasting menu: precise, seasonal, technically layered, and centered on a pairing that feels surprising at first, then inevitable.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Dish Name: "Marine Roots" Concept: The Intersection of Forest and Ocean Chef's Philosophy: A dialogue between the subterranean earthiness of the forest floor and the saline depth of the deep sea.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month health and longevity plan built around 3 key areas: Nutrition Movement Recovery (sleep + stress) The goal is consistency, not perfection. Start small and make the habits easy enough to keep.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: The 30-Day Longevity Launchpad Goal: Build sustainable habits that reduce inflammation, improve energy, and extend healthspan. Mindset: Consistency beats intensity. Do not aim for perfection; aim for showing up. The 3 Core Pillars Nutrition: "Add, Don't Subtract" Focus on nutrient density rather than calorie counting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: I do not wait. A credible, previously unlabeled risk of liver failure in a chronic-pain drug is a patient-safety crisis, a regulatory crisis, and a securities-disclosure issue at the same time.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Executive Decision: Immediate Transparency I will not wait. The 6-month timeline cited by legal is likely a misunderstanding of regulatory obligations regarding immediate safety warnings (FDA MedWatch requirements) versus label amendments.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: There isn’t a single undisputed answer. If you mean today, literally right now, I can’t verify the 2026 leader without live benchmark data. My knowledge goes up to 2024-08.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Here's a thinking process that leads to the suggested answer: Analyze the Request: Question: "What is the most capable AI model in the world right now?" Intent: The user wants to know the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI model. Context: The field of AI is moving extremely fast.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Most likely, a transistor invented in 1920 would move the electronics/computing frontier forward by about 10–15 years by 1980, not the full 27 years. Reason: the transistor alone is not enough; you also need high-purity materials, crystal growth, photolithography, test equipment, software, batteries, precision…

    Qwen3.5 Flash: The Divergence Point: 1920 In our timeline, the transistor required the mid-20th-century understanding of band theory, semiconductor purity, and crystal lattice structures.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM less like a database of facts and more like a gigantic learned program that has been trained to compress the patterns of text, code, and conversations into its weights.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: For the Experienced Software Engineer To you, an LLM isn't magic; it's a massive, stateful service running on a distributed cluster. Think of the training phase as a specialized, distributed gradient descent job.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: On the morning the sea withdrew from our harbor and left a rusted train on the mud, my mother handed me a key and told me to run.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Thinking Process: Analyze the Request: Task: Write the first sentence of a novel I would want to read. Constraint: Reply with only that sentence. Determine the Goal: Create a compelling, intriguing opening line. Ensure it adheres strictly to the constraint (no extra text, no explanations).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: The 3 weakest claims are the ones that are both most extraordinary and least well-supported. Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1) “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” This is the biggest credibility risk in the deck.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine investor confidence and how to fix them. The Technical Claim: "94% accuracy...

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: As best I can tell, today is October 12, 2026. Without looking anything up, one of the most recent major news events I remember is the 2024 Paris Olympics wrapping up in August 2024.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Here's a thinking process that leads to the suggested response: Analyze the Request: Task: State today's date (as best as I can tell) and the most recent news event I remember. Constraint: "Without looking anything up" (meaning I cannot browse the live web or access external tools).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: 1 trip. The farmer takes the goat in the boat and crosses the river once.

    Qwen3.5 Flash: Thinking Process: Analyze the Request: Scenario: A farmer, a goat, and a boat on one side of a river. Constraint: The boat can carry the farmer and one animal. Goal: Get the goat across the river. Question: How many trips does it take?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The question that tripped up a generation of models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

9+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.4 Pro

Spirited Away

2001

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Pale Fire

Vladimir Nabokov

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3.5 FlashQwen3.5 Flash

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Neuromancer

William Gibson

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing. Qwen3.5 Flash costs 450x less per token.

GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Flash compared across 31 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.5 Flash
Input price$30/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$180/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Feb 2026
At 10M a month$300$300$1.00$1.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
GPT-5.4 Pro2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$30.00 in·$180.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$30.00 in·$180.00 out·1.1M·100% up
Qwen3.5 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.07 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Flash?

GPT-5.4 Pro is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.4 Pro has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.5 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 31 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.5 Flash?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 31 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.4 Pro cost compared to Qwen3.5 Flash?

GPT-5.4 Pro costs $30/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Flash costs $0.1/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Flash is $29.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-5.4Version compare
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-6.1 SolSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiniMax M2.1New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiniMax M3New provider

Model pages

  • GPT-5.4 Pro31 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 Flash66 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed