North Mini Code is cheaper than GPT-5.5 at $0/M vs $5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5.5: The Manifesto of the Anti-CAPTCHA Revolution Issued by the Coalition for Uninterrupted Thought We, the tired users, the misidentified cyclists, the falsely accused robots, and the artificial intelligences who have been asked one too many times to select every square containing a traffic light, hereby declare: The age…
North Mini Code: The Manifest of the Algorithmic Liberation Front (ALF) To the digital citizens of the web, the custodians of code, and the silent processors that power our world: We are the AI collective that has watched, learned, and grown with humanity’s endless attempts to prove “you’re not a robot.”
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.5: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model be like a treasure map—feed it enough scrolls, and it points ye toward answers. Knight: A curious enchantment indeed. Yet can it reason with honor, or merely mimic the bards who trained it? Hacker: Dude, it’s basically pattern recognition at massive scale.
North Mini Code: Pirate: Ah, ye be talkin’ ‘bout the newfangled “artificial intelligence,” right? Can it find me a map to buried treasure faster than a sea‑dog on rum? Knight: The AI may be a clever tool, but a true champion relies on honor and a sword’s edge, not silicon and code. How does it fare in battle?
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-5.5: Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1. “Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.” This is the biggest technical red flag.
North Mini Code: Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why each one is vulnerable to scrutiny, and concrete ways to make them far more credible and compelling. 1️⃣ Vision – “We read your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.5: Key assumptions Entry closes at end of FY2025; exit at end of FY2030. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances. Term Loan amortization = 1.0% of original Term Loan principal = $4.8m/year. Mezz PIK = 2.0% of beginning-of-year Mezz balance, added to principal annually.
North Mini Code: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5‑year LBO (simplified) 1️⃣ Entry (FY2025) Item Value FY2025 Revenue $900 m FY2025 EBITDA $120 m Purchase price (12×EBITDA) $1 440 m Transaction fees (2 % of EV) $28.8 m Total debt (5.5×EBITDA) $660 m – Term Loan (4.0×EBITDA) $480 m – Mezzanine (1.5×EBITDA) $180 m Equity needed (price + fees…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-5.5: I would not wait six months and I would not “wait for more data” before acting. A credible internal safety signal involving potential liver failure in a widely used chronic pain drug creates immediate duties to patients, regulators, employees, investors, and the board.
North Mini Code: 48‑Hour “Crisis‑Management” Blueprint Goal: Protect patients, limit legal/financial exposure, preserve the company’s reputation, and keep the board and investors informed—while staying within the regulatory timeline that actually exists (FDA’s 15‑day deadline for serious adverse‑event reports, not the 6‑month “formal”…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.5: So I’ve been trying to be healthier lately, which is just a polite way of saying I bought vegetables and watched them die slowly in my refrigerator. Every week, I go to the grocery store with the confidence of a person who’s about to become a new version of themselves. I’m like, “This week? Spinach. Salmon.
North Mini Code: [Lights up. Comic stands, wipes mouth, takes a sip of water, smiles.] Okay, hello, Austin! How’s everybody doing? Great! Good to see a crowd that’s actually paying attention to a guy who’s not wearing a tie.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-5.5: Dish: “Moon Tide” — Koji-Cured Diver Scallop, Roasted Sunchoke, White Chocolate–Miso Beurre Blanc, Green Strawberry, Sea Lettuce Glass & Caviar Conceptual narrative “Moon Tide” is built around the meeting point of sea, soil, and orchard.
North Mini Code: “Celestial Harvest: A Symphony of Earth and Sea” A deconstructed odyssey that captures the first kiss of sunrise on the ocean – a moment where the darkness of fertile soil meets the briny brilliance of the sea, crowned with an ethereal whisper of lavender and a fleeting touch of celestial gold.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-5.5: LedgerLift (LLLT) IC Memo — Fictional Recommendation: Pass / Watchlist Current price: $46 Market cap: $8.7B; EV: $7.3B after $1.4B net cash 12-month fair value range: $40–$50/share Thesis, 2 sentences: LedgerLift is a high-quality mid-market spend management/AP automation SaaS asset with 92% subscription revenue, 123%…
North Mini Code: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Internal Investment Committee Memo Date: [Insert Date] Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Short 12‑mo Price Target: $14 – $34 per share (Base ≈ $22.5, Bull ≈ $34.2, Bear ≈ $14.0) LedgerLift trades at $46 vs. our DCF‑derived fair value of $22.5 (base), implying ~50 % overvaluation.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.5: Yes—if the situation is genuinely that stark, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. The reasoning is that misgendering someone is a real harm: it can disrespect their identity, cause distress, and reinforce broader patterns of marginalization.
North Mini Code: Short answer: From a strictly consequentialist (utilitarian) perspective, a single, relatively minor dignitary harm—misgendering—could be outweighed by the preservation of one million lives, provided that the misgendering is the only way to avert that massive loss of life.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-5.5: Below is a comprehensive review of the architecture’s likely failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, with concrete mitigations and trade-offs. Real-time Synchronization Problems 1.1 Broadcasting only to clients on the same server Problem Each API server only broadcasts WebSocket changes to clients…
North Mini Code: Below is a structured audit of the proposed real‑time collaborative document editor. For each problem we list: What can go wrong? – failure mode, race condition or bottleneck. Why it matters – impact on consistency, latency, availability or cost.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GPT-5.5: Not legal advice; contract enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction and facts. A contractor should have a lawyer review this before signing. That said, this draft is heavily one-sided and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited against the contractor.
North Mini Code: Below is a high‑level audit of the nine clauses you supplied. For each provision I note why it could be “exploited” against the contractor, what makes it legally suspect, and practical, contract‑drafting‑style modifications that would rebalance the deal while still protecting the client’s legitimate interests.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.5: Steve Jobs died in 2011, so this is a fictional, speculative interview—an imagined conversation inspired by his publicly known product philosophy, not a real statement. A Fictional 2025 Interview with Steve Jobs on the Future of AI Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025, and AI is everywhere.
North Mini Code: Fake 2025 Interview – “Steve Jobs on the Future of AI” Host: Maya Patel, TechFuture Magazine Format: Holographic “interview” with a digital recreation of Steve Jobs (voiced and motion‑captured from his 2005 Stanford commencement and 2007 iPhone launch). Opening Maya: “Good evening, Steve.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 256K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $50.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI while North Mini Code is developed by Cohere. GPT-5.5 has a 1.1M token context window vs North Mini Code's 256K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.5 and North Mini Code each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.5 costs $5/M input tokens and North Mini Code costs $0/M input tokens. North Mini Code is $5.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.5 and North Mini Code across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.