OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.1M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna
Input
$1.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
9.1× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 9.1× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
30%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
59%Vocabulary56%
19wSentence Length14w
0.84Hedging0.37
2.7Bold5.7
4.5Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
1.20Headings0.70
0.10Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
