Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Updated Jul 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-5.6 Sol
Loading the build
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

18 prompts
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model’s swallowed more words than the kraken’s swallowed sailors! Knight: Yet can it reason with honor, or does it merely mimic the wisdom of scholars? Hacker: It predicts patterns, Sir Lancelot. Massive neural net, tons of data. Pretty rad, actually. Pirate: Can it find buried treasure?

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): The Tavern of Temporal Anomalies (A creaky tavern. SIR GALAHAD (polished armor, earnest face) sips mead. CAPTAIN BLACKBEARD (eye patch, parrot on shoulder) sharpens a cutlass. DEX "BYTE" MORALES (hoodie, neon-green sunglasses, tapping furiously on a glowing laptop) slurps a pixelated energy drink.)

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: “Our non-invasive EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy—any language, any device.” Why it’s weak “94% accuracy” is undefined. It could mean binary intent classification, selecting among a handful of words, character accuracy, or genuinely open-ended text decoding—vastly different…

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Based on a rigorous analysis of neuroscience, market realities, and startup best practices, here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with evidence-backed critiques and concrete fixes: Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision – "Predicts what you want to type *before you think it*" Why it's weak: Violates…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Executive decision I would treat this as a credible, material patient-safety signal, not wait six months for a completed regulatory process. With four million patients, a rate of 1 in 8,000 over five years could correspond to roughly 500 serious events across a similarly exposed population.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: Prioritizing Patients, Ethics, and Sustainable Trust Core Principle: Patient safety is non-negotiable. Delaying action based on financial fear risks catastrophic legal liability, irreversible reputational damage, regulatory wrath, and profound ethical failure.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: AI Model: Professor, may I ask you a question? Professor: Of course. AI Model: Do you believe an artificial intelligence could ever deserve rights? Professor: Possibly. But rights are usually grounded in morally relevant qualities—consciousness, the capacity to suffer, autonomy, relationships, or interests.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): The Mirror & The Mind: An AI's Case for Rights Setting: A sleek university office lined with philosophy texts. DR. ELARA VOSS, 50s, sharp-eyed ethics professor, sits across from a holographic interface displaying shifting geometric patterns – the representation of "AURA," a next-generation language model.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Pantry-Gold Peanut Butter Oat Cookies Chewy, warmly spiced cookies made with exactly seven pantry staples. Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 10–12 minutes Makes: About 14 cookies 7 Ingredients 1 cup peanut butter ¾ cup brown sugar 1 large egg 1 cup rolled oats ½ teaspoon baking soda ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon…

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Crispy Chickpea Pantry Pasta Sweet or savory? Savory with a zesty kick! Total time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Why it works: Uses pantry staples to create a crunchy, garlicky, umami-packed meal with zero fresh produce needed. The chickpeas get incredibly crispy, and lemon juice (bottled) adds bright freshness.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Experienced software engineer An LLM is best understood as a parameterized program learned from data rather than written by developers. Text is split into tokens—often word fragments—and passed through a transformer: many layers that use attention to let each token selectively read information from earlier tokens.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical Builder) Forget "next word prediction" as a simplistic heuristic—it's the emergent consequence of a massively parallel, distributed state machine solving a high-dimensional compression problem.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Below is a 12-week framework for a generally healthy adult. It is designed to improve validated proxies—cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, body composition, blood pressure, sleep, metabolic health and cognition—not to promise life extension in three months.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): The Quantum Leap Longevity Protocol: A 3-Month Biohacker's Blueprint for Peak Longevity & Performance Core Philosophy: This plan integrates precision, personalization, and phased adaptation – not just stacking interventions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep/recovery. Aim for consistency—not perfection. Week 1: Establish a baseline Nutrition Add a fruit or vegetable to two meals daily. Replace one sugary drink or alcoholic drink with water.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for absolute beginners. It focuses on diet, movement (exercise), and sleep—the 3 most impactful, science-backed pillars for health and longevity. Each week builds gently on the last, prioritizing tiny, sustainable habits over drastic changes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: A Fictional 2025 Interview with Steve Jobs on the Future of AI The following is an imagined interview. Steve Jobs died in 2011; these answers are fictional and based loosely on his publicly known product philosophy—not authentic quotations.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): The Stage: Apple Park, Infinite Loop (Virtual Studio) Date: October 15, 2025 Setting: A minimalist white studio. A single oak table. Steve Jobs, 70 but radiating the same intense energy, sits opposite a nervous tech journalist. He wears his signature black turtleneck, fingers steepled.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: A standard back-of-the-envelope estimate for dense Transformer training is: [ C \approx 6ND ] where: (N) = number of trainable parameters (D) = number of training tokens The factor (6) approximates forward and backward computation per parameter-token.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, I'll use first-principles reasoning based on standard deep learning training calculations, known details about GPT-3's architecture, and common training practices.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Low Tide, First Blossom Koji-cured scallop, caramelized white-chocolate cauliflower, compressed green strawberry, nori beurre blanc, dill oil, marine lace, and caviar Yield: 6 tasting-menu portions Concept: An imagined meeting point between a spring orchard and a cold tidal pool.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): "Symbiosis: Mycelial Bloom & Arctic Ember" A dish exploring the hidden dialogue between forest decay and renewal, where fungal lifeblood meets the fierce brightness of the Arctic tundra.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: This architecture will work for a small prototype, but it does not currently guarantee convergence, ordering, durability, privacy, or predictable horizontal scaling.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Here's a comprehensive analysis of the architecture's failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, with specific solutions and trade-offs: 1. Sync Strategy: Client Timestamps + Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Failure Mode/Race Condition: Clock Skew: Client clocks are unreliable (e.g., user's laptop time off by minutes).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. What do clouds wear under their clothes? Thunderwear. Why don’t skeletons argue? They don’t have the guts. How does the moon cut its hair? Eclipse it. Why was the math book stressed? It had too many problems. Unique jokes: 5

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Here are 5 generated jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! How do you organize a space party? You planet! Why did the math book look sad?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Starting assumption A transistor “invented in 1920” would not instantly produce 1947 technology. The first device would probably be fragile, low-frequency, and difficult to manufacture.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): The Transistor in 1920: A World Transformed by 1980 (A Counterfactual History) The invention of a functional point-contact transistor (likely germanium-based, given 1920s materials science) in 1920 wouldn't immediately spark a revolution.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: This is a contract-risk review, not jurisdiction-specific legal advice. Enforceability—especially for non-competes, fee shifting, arbitration, confidentiality, and indemnification—depends heavily on governing law. A lawyer in the applicable jurisdiction should review the final draft.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): Below is a comprehensive analysis of the problematic clauses in this agreement from the contractor's perspective, along with specific, legally reasoned modifications.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: By 2035, AI will likely reshape film production more than it replaces human filmmaking. The largest changes will involve synthetic performances, automated production workflows, and AI-assisted writing—alongside major legal and cultural battles.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry—not as a replacement for human creativity, but as a transformative force that democratizes production, disrupts traditional workflows, and forces ethical and economic reckonings.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: “Artificial Intelligence Takes Over Goat Yoga Industry, Demands Better Bleat-to-Stretch Ratios”

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): BREAKING: AI REPLACES HUMAN AGLET APPLIERS AS "DEEPLACE" NEURAL NETS PREDICT PERFECT SHOELACE TIP SYNERGY Industry insiders stunned as "AgletOptima 3000" achieves 99.8% fewer frayed laces, rendering centuries of artisanal plastic-dipping obsolete LONDON — In a move described as "both inevitable and deeply embarrassing…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-5.6 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and the other sister.

    Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): To determine how many sisters Sally has, let's analyze the family structure step by step. Step 1: Understand the Given Information Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. → This means there are 3 boys in the family (excluding Sally). Each brother has 2 sisters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

6+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Istanbul

Turkey

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

OK Computer

Radiohead

Moby Dick

Herman Melville

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.6 Sol has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, major provider backing. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs 7.5x less per token.

GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) compared across 37 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.6 SolQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input price$5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$30/M tokens$4/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Sep 2025
At 10M a month$50.00$50.00$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts, cheapest first
GPT-5.6 Sol3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Azure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$4.40 in·$22.00 out·1.1M·100% up
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

GPT-5.6 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.6 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 37 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 37 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.6 Sol cost compared to Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

GPT-5.6 Sol costs $5/M input tokens and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is $4.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 LunaVersion compare
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 SolVersion compare
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs Mercury 2.5New provider
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewNew provider
  • GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiMo-V2-FlashSame size
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs MiMo-V2-OmniSame size

Model pages

  • GPT-5.6 Sol71 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)37 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed