GPT-5.6 TerravsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra at $0.15/M vs $2.5/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5.6 Terra | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2.5/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.6 Terra has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 10x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra
Input
$2.50
Output
$15.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
17× cheaper
Output
$1.50
10× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 17× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
GPT-5.6 Terra
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
57%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length16w
0.85Hedging0.31
2.8Bold6.0
4.6Lists4.5
0.00Emoji0.58
1.12Headings0.88
0.06Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3 Coder NextCross-provider
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3 Coder PlusCross-provider
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3 MaxCross-provider
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3 Max ThinkingCross-provider