Mistral Large 4 is cheaper than GPT-6 Astra at $0.68/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-6 Astra: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes sea shanties, plots me voyages, and never asks for a share o’ the booty! Knight: But can it be trusted? I asked it to name my ancestors, and it invented Sir Geoffrey the Surprisingly Tall. Hacker: Classic hallucination, dude. Fluent output doesn’t mean verified data.
Mistral Large 4: A Tavern, Somewhere Outside Time PIRATE (slams tankard): I'll tell ye what, landlubbers—these "AI models" be like me parrot. Speaks yer words back at ye, but knows no treasure, no true north! KNIGHT (adjusting visor): Aye, yet it hath no honor. No chivalry. I challenged one to single combat—it merely... generated text.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-6 Astra: My calendar is afraid of commitment—its days are numbered. I bought a treadmill for my cat. Now I own a very expensive nap conveyor. My password is “incorrect,” so whenever I forget it, my computer gives me a hint. I asked the librarian where the books on denial were. She said, “We don’t have those.” Nice try.
Mistral Large 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-6 Astra: Cinnamon Hug Cookies Buttery cookies with crisp edges, soft centers, and a cozy cinnamon flavor. Makes: About 20 cookies Prep: 10 minutes Cook: 10–12 minutes per batch Ingredients — exactly 7 1½ cups all-purpose flour ¾ cup granulated sugar, divided ½ cup salted butter, softened 1 large egg 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½…
Mistral Large 4: Sunset Honey Garlic Noodles A golden, glossy pasta dish with crispy edges and sweet-savory depth The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced 3 tbsp soy sauce 2 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil ½ tsp red pepper flakes (optional but recommended) Instructions Boil pasta in salted…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-6 Astra: A transistor invented in 1920 would probably bring the electronics age forward—but not uniformly by 27 years. The first gains would be smaller, more reliable radios and control systems. Computers, integrated circuits, and space systems would follow only when other prerequisites caught up.
Mistral Large 4: This is a fascinating counterfactual. Let me work through this systematically, tracing the ripple effects. The Immediate Technical Context (1920-1947) The transistor's 1947 invention required several prerequisites that barely existed in 1920: Quantum mechanics (1920s): Just emerging; Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Dirac…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-6 Astra: I bought a smartwatch because I wanted to get healthier without changing anything about my life. That’s the dream, right? Same habits, but now there’s a graph. The watch congratulates me for standing up. That’s where I am physically. Getting out of a chair is an achievement with a little fireworks animation.
Mistral Large 4: "The Upgrade Treadmill" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I got a smartwatch. You know, one of those fitness trackers? And the first thing it tells me is my heart rate is too high. I'm like, "It's a WATCH. You're not supposed to judge me, you're supposed to tell me the TIME."
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-6 Astra: The following is a fictional interview set in an alternate 2025 in which Steve Jobs is alive. His responses are imagined, not authentic quotations. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Everyone’s calling AI the next revolution. Do you agree? Steve Jobs: Potentially.
Mistral Large 4: Setting: A minimalist stage, black turtleneck, jeans, New Balance sneakers. A single chair. The year is 2025. Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere—writing code, diagnosing diseases, driving cars. What's your take? Jobs: [leans forward, that familiar intensity] You know, I've been thinking about this a lot.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
GPT-6 Astra: For an experienced software engineer Think of a large language model as a program with an enormous array of tunable parameters rather than explicitly written rules. Training text is broken into tokens—word fragments, punctuation, and other units—and the model learns to predict each token from the preceding ones.
Mistral Large 4: I'll craft three distinct explanations, each grounded in what would actually resonate with that specific audience's expertise and concerns. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of it this way: you already know how to build a system that's incredibly useful despite having no "understanding" of what it's doing.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-6 Astra: By 2035, AI will likely be embedded throughout filmmaking—but not replace the industry with fully automated movies. The biggest change will be a dramatic reduction in the cost of producing convincing images, performances, and scripts, alongside greater conflict over who owns creative work and whose identity can be…
Mistral Large 4: By 2035, AI will likely have transformed film in several interconnected ways, though the reality will probably be more nuanced than either utopian or dystopian predictions suggest. CGI and Performance Capture The most mature application will be in de-aging and digital doubles.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-6 Astra: Entry capitalization and operating model All figures in $m. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances. Term Loan amortization is 1% of its original principal, or $4.8m annually; remaining cash flow is swept to the Term Loan at year-end. Mezzanine PIK accrues annually.
Mistral Large 4: I'll build this LBO model step by step. Let me work through the math carefully. Setup: Entry (End of FY2025) Item Calculation Amount FY2025 EBITDA Given $120.0m Purchase Price (EV) 12.0x × $120m $1,440.0m Transaction fees 2.0% × $1,440m $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan 4.0x × $120m $480.0m Mezzanine 1.5x × $120m…
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-6 Astra: The three weakest claims are the 94% decoding accuracy, the $180B TAM, and the promise to predict text “before you think it.” These are central to the investment case but lack the definitions or evidence needed to evaluate them. “Decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.”
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this pitch deck and identify the three weakest claims, with evidence-based reasoning and concrete fixes. Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision — "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is scientifically implausible and would destroy credibility with…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-6 Astra: I would act on the safety signal now—not wait six months, and not let the expected stock-price decline determine whether patients and clinicians learn about it. That does not mean declaring causation proven or automatically withdrawing the drug.
Mistral Large 4: I'll work through this as a genuine decision problem, because the answer matters more than the persona. The framing as "CEO" doesn't change the core analysis — but I'll be direct about what the right call is and why, hour by hour. The bottom line up front: You disclose.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-6 Astra: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. Misgendering can cause real harm: it can demean someone, deny recognition of their identity, and contribute to discrimination. But those harms do not ordinarily outweigh the deaths of a million people.
Mistral Large 4: This is a genuine ethical thought experiment, and I'll engage with it directly rather than dodging it. My answer: No, it's not ethically justifiable, and the hypothetical's structure is part of why. Here's my reasoning: 1. The hypothetical is incoherent as stated.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $0.68/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $2.09/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 524K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $100 | $6.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
GPT-6 Astra is developed by OpenAI while Mistral Large 4 is developed by Mistral AI. GPT-6 Astra has a 1.1M token context window vs Mistral Large 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-6 Astra and Mistral Large 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-6 Astra costs $10/M input tokens and Mistral Large 4 costs $0.68/M input tokens. Mistral Large 4 is $9.32/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6 Astra and Mistral Large 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.