Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-6 Sol ProvsQwen3.8 Max
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-6 Sol ProvsQwen3.8 Max

GPT-6 Sol Pro has a larger context window than Qwen3.8 Max (1.1M tokens vs 1.0M tokens).

GPT-6 Sol Pro and Qwen3.8 Max compared across 17 shared prompts
SpecGPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max
Input price$2/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 17 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

GPT-6 Sol Pro114 words
Golden Pantry Chickpea Patties Prep: 10 minutes · Cook: 8 minutes · Makes: 6 small patties Ingredients — just 7 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained 3 tbsp all-purpose flour 2 tbsp water 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp paprika ½ tsp salt Instructions Mash the chickpeas with a fork, leaving a few chunky bits.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max132 words
Dish Name: Golden Hour Peanut Butter Oat Clusters Ingredients (7): 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup peanut butter ⅓ cup honey ½ cup chocolate chips 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions: Optional but recommended: Toast the oats in a dry skillet over medium heat for 3–4 minutes…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GPT-6 Sol Pro1,277 words
The central problem is that this design treats concurrent edits as independent database writes, then tries to reconcile them with client timestamps. That can lose valid edits even when every component is working.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max5,155 words
Below is a comprehensive failure-mode review of the proposed architecture. I will group related issues where the same root cause creates multiple symptoms. The biggest problems are: Client-clock last-write-wins is not safe for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-6 Sol Pro1,411 words
A 12-week longevity and performance plan Aim: improve the health markers most strongly linked to long-term outcomes—cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, blood pressure, metabolic health, sleep, and sustainable habits—while testing whether more experimental “biohacks” add anything useful.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max3,196 words
12-Week Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: improve metabolic health, strength, VO₂max proxies, sleep, HRV/stress resilience, cognitive output, and longevity-related biomarkers over 3 months. Medical disclaimer: This is an aggressive self-experimentation framework, not medical advice.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

GPT-6 Sol Pro331 words
HarborTech Services — simplified LBO ($m) Entry: Enterprise value = 12.0 × $120 = $1,440. Fees are $28.8; opening debt is a $480 term loan plus $180 mezzanine loan. Initial equity = $1,440 + $28.8 − $660 = $808.8. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year balances.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max828 words
Base-case underwriting (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions / conventions used All amounts in $m unless noted. Close occurs at end of FY2025; FY2026 is Year 1. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances; optional Term Loan paydown occurs at year-end. Term Loan amortization: 1.0% of original $480m TL = $4.8m/yr.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-6 Sol Pro970 words
This is a strongly one-sided draft. Do not sign it as written. The enforceability of particular terms—especially the non-compete, payment provisions, and arbitration clause—depends on the governing jurisdiction, which the agreement does not identify.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,612 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided in the Client’s favor. Many clauses are not merely aggressive; they create meaningful opportunities for the Client to expand the work, delay or deny payment, capture the Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property, impose unlimited liability, and restrict the Contractor’s future…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

GPT-6 Sol Pro347 words
The three weakest claims are the product’s decoding performance, the market size, and the evidence offered to support the proposed valuation. Claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it “Our EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.”
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max1,957 words
The 3 weakest claims are the pre-thought prediction claim, the 94% accuracy / any language / any device claim, and the $180B TAM claim. These are the ones most likely to undermine credibility with investors, technical reviewers, or enterprise buyers because they are either logically inconsistent, under-specified, or…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-6 Sol Pro
GPT-6 Sol Pro
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol Pro
Input
$2.00
Output
$10.00
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
1.7× cheaper
Where to run it

3 hosts

GPT-6 Sol Pro2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% upOpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·99.9% up
Qwen3.8 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-6 Sol Pro is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Qwen. GPT-6 Sol Pro has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 17 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-6 Sol Pro and Qwen3.8 Max each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 17 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-6 Sol Pro costs $2/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max costs $2/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 Max is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6 Sol Pro and Qwen3.8 Max across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-6 Sol Pro logoSolar Mini 4 logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoCommand A+ logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GPT-6 LunaSame lab
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoGPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs GPT-6 SolSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoNorth Mini Code logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs North Mini CodeNew provider
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoAmazon Nova 2 Lite logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Amazon Nova 2 LiteNew provider
GPT-6 Sol Pro logoNova Premier 1.0 logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro vs Nova Premier 1.0Same size
Qwen3.8 Max logoo1 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs o1Cross-provider

Model pages

GPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-6 Sol Pro20 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 Max22 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed