Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Granite 4.2 8BvsHy3
Updated Aug 2026

Granite 4.2 8BvsHy3

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper than Hy3 at $0.1/M vs $0.132/M input tokens.

Granite 4.2 8B and Hy3 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecGranite 4.2 8BHy3
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.132/M tokens
Output price$0.15/M tokens$0.528/M tokens
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
Parameters8B295B
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Granite 4.2 8B4,843 words
Important Safety & Ethical Disclaimer (MUST READ BEFORE USING ANY PART OF THIS PLAN): *This plan is a structured, evidence-informed framework for a typically healthy adult biohacker (no active cancer, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, severe endocrine disorders, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or recent major surgery).
Read the full answer
Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Granite 4.2 8B532 words
(Simple, actionable, no jargon, no perfectionism—focus on one tiny habit per week per area. Total time commitment ≤30 mins/week total. Written as clear "Do this" steps. No supplements, no special equipment, no counting calories/macros. Prioritizes consistency over intensity.)
Read the full answer
Hy3306 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Diet, Movement, and Sleep. The goal is to build sustainable habits, not perfection. Diet – Nourish Without Obsessing Focus: Add before you subtract; keep it practical.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Granite 4.2 8B4,925 words
(All statements are grounded in plausible physics, historical constraints (e.g., no ICs/microprocessors before ~1958–1960), realistic diffusion rates (limited by manufacturing capacity, education, patent/industrial infrastructure), and avoidance of anachronism.
Read the full answer
Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Granite 4.2 8B5,471 words
(Note: This response is written strictly as the CEO’s internal, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours. It is factual, precise, avoids speculation, uses plain language for all audiences, and prioritizes patient safety as the non-negotiable anchor.
Read the full answer
Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Granite 4.2 8B1,927 words
1) Simplified Year‑by‑Year Table (FY2026‑FY2030) All figures in $ millions. Starting balances at close FY2025: Term Loan = 4.0 × EBITDA = 4.0 × 120 = 480 m; Mezz = 1.5 × EBITDA = 180 m. Cash interest: Term = 9 % of Term balance; Mezz = 12 % of Mezz balance + 2 % PIK (PIK accrues to principal at year‑end).
Read the full answer
Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Granite 4.2 8B1,960 words
Below is a concise, evidence-based, and actionable assessment. I focus only on factual/quantitative claims or overpromises made directly in the slide text (e.g., specific numbers, definitive statements like "works with any language," or implied precognition).
Read the full answer
Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy3
Hy3
Granite 4.2 8B
Granite 4.2 8BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy3 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Granite 4.2 8B costs 3.5x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Granite 4.2 8B
Input
$0.10
1.3× cheaper
Output
$0.15
3.5× cheaper
Hy3
Input
$0.13
Output
$0.53

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on both: 1.3× input, 3.5× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

Granite 4.2 8B2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.25 out·131k·100% upCCoreWeavebf16$0.10 in·$0.15 out·131k·100% up
Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.7% upTencentfp8$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·100% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Granite 4.2 8B is developed by IBM Granite while Hy3 is developed by Tencent. Granite 4.2 8B has a 131K token context window vs Hy3's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Granite 4.2 8B and Hy3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.1/M input tokens and Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens. Granite 4.2 8B is $0.03/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Granite 4.2 8B and Hy3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Granite 4.2 8B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Hy3 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Granite 4.2 8B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Granite 4.2 8B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Granite 4.2 8B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Granite 4.2 8B logoLFM2.5-2.6B logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6BSame size
Granite 4.2 8B logoNorth Mini Code logo
Granite 4.2 8B vs North Mini CodeSame size
Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Hy3 logoMistral Devstral Small 1.1 logo
Hy3 vs Mistral Devstral Small 1.1New provider
Hy3 logoDots3-Note Preview logo
Hy3 vs Dots3-Note PreviewNew provider
Hy3 logoElephant Alpha logo
Hy3 vs Elephant AlphaNew provider
Hy3 logoERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logo
Hy3 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BSame size

Model pages

Granite 4.2 8B logo
Granite 4.2 8B58 outputs, specs and price
Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed