Grok 3 Mini Beta is cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro at $0.4/M vs $1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Grok 3 Mini Beta costs 3.8x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.8/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $4.00 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI while MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi. Grok 3 Mini Beta has a 131K token context window vs MiMo-V2-Pro's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Mini Beta and MiMo-V2-Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1/M input tokens. Grok 3 Mini Beta is $0.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Mini Beta and MiMo-V2-Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.