Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is the newer model, released after Grok 3 Thinking.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 3 Thinking has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | Free |
| Output price | — | Free |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | — | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jun 2026 |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Grok 3 Thinking is developed by xAI while Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is developed by NVIDIA. Grok 3 Thinking has a 128K token context window vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Grok 3 Thinking and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 3 Thinking and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.