Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Hy3vsMiniMax M2.7
Updated Jul 2026

Hy3vsMiniMax M2.7

Hy3 is cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 at $0.132/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

Hy3 and MiniMax M2.7 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecHy3MiniMax M2.7
Input price$0.132/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$0.528/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window262K tokens205K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Mar 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.7417 words
“Golden Harvest Chickpea Stew” Hearty, spiced, and ready in about 40 minutes—perfect for a quick weeknight dinner using only pantry staples. Item Details Prep Time 10 minutes Cook Time 30 minutes Total Time 40 minutes Servings 4 (about 1 ½ cups each) Vegan / Gluten‑Free Yes (just make sure your canned goods are…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.7715 words
HARBORTECH SERVICES (HTS) – 5‑year LBO underwriting ($ m) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Revenue 972.0 1 040.0 1 102.4 1 157.6 1 215.4 EBITDA 136.1 156.0 176.4 191.0 206.6 Cash‑interest – Term Loan (9 %) 43.2 41.0 37.6 32.8 26.8 Cash‑interest – Mezz (12 %) 21.6 22.0 22.5 22.9 23.4 Total cash interest 64.8 63.1…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.71,980 words
Crisis Response Action Plan: 48-Hour Framework Executive Summary The right course of action is clear: disclose transparently, protect patients immediately, and engage regulators urgently. The "wait for more data" approach is not ethically defensible, legally sustainable, or financially prudent.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Hy3306 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Diet, Movement, and Sleep. The goal is to build sustainable habits, not perfection. Diet – Nourish Without Obsessing Focus: Add before you subtract; keep it practical.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.7953 words
🚀 1‑Month “Health & Longevity” Kick‑Start Below is a beginner‑friendly, 3‑area plan (Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep + Stress). Each week builds on the last, so you’ll never feel overwhelmed. Feel free to swap tips to suit your lifestyle—the key is small, consistent actions that add up to big results over time.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.7987 words
Advanced 3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan Foundational Philosophy This protocol integrates epigenetic modulation, metabolic flexibility, proteostasis maintenance, and stress resilience into a cohesive system.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M2.71,561 words
Below are the three claims in the MindMeld AI deck that are most likely to raise red‑flags with a savvy investor. For each one I’ll spell out exactly why the statement is weak and then give a concrete, actionable fix you can use to back it up or re‑frame it.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy3
Hy3
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy3 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Hy3
Input
$0.13
2.3× cheaper
Output
$0.53
2.3× cheaper
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20

Hy3 is cheaper on both: 2.3× input, 2.3× output.

Where to run it

14 hosts, cheapest first

Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Tencentfp8$0.08 in·$0.33 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.6% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·99.7% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up
MiniMax M2.78 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
GGMI Cloudfp8$0.21 in·$0.84 out·197k·99.4% upNNovitafp8$0.27 in·$1.08 out·205k·99.1% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·197k·98.7% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·205k·99.6% upGroq$0.60 in·$1.80 out·197k·99.5% upSSambaNova$0.60 in·$2.40 out·197k·98.6% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
MMaradegraded$0.24 in·$0.96 out·197k·87.6% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.38 in·$1.70 out·197k·82.4% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Hy3 is developed by Tencent while MiniMax M2.7 is developed by MiniMax. Hy3 has a 262K token context window vs MiniMax M2.7's 205K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Hy3 and MiniMax M2.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens and MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.3/M input tokens. Hy3 is $0.17/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Hy3 and MiniMax M2.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Hy3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoGLM 5.3 logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Hy3 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
MiniMax M2.7 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs MiniMax M2.5Version compare
MiniMax M2.7 logoMiniMax M3 logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs MiniMax M3Version compare
Hy3 logoNova Premier 1.0 logo
Hy3 vs Nova Premier 1.0New provider
Hy3 logoo1 logo
Hy3 vs o1New provider
Hy3 logoOpenAI o3 logo
Hy3 vs OpenAI o3Same size
Hy3 logoo3 Mini logo
Hy3 vs o3 MiniNew provider

Model pages

Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
MiniMax M2.7 logo
MiniMax M2.753 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed