Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Hy3vsQwen3.7 Max
Updated Jul 2026

Hy3vsQwen3.7 Max

Hy3 is cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max at $0.132/M vs $2.5/M input tokens.

Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecHy3Qwen3.7 Max
Input price$0.132/M tokens$2.5/M tokens
Output price$0.528/M tokens$7.5/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026May 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Max1,492 words
As CEO, my primary directives are patient safety, protecting the long-term viability of the company, and strict adherence to the law. First, I must address a critical flaw in the premise: My internal legal team’s advice that "formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months" is dangerously incorrect and potentially…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Max626 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) — LBO Underwriting Memo Sources & Uses Sources $m Uses $m Term Loan (4.0x) 480.0 Purchase Price (12.0x) 1,440.0 Mezzanine (1.5x) 180.0 Transaction Fees (2.0%) 28.8 Equity (plug) 808.8 Total 1,468.8 Total 1,468.8 Year-by-Year Operating & Debt Schedule ($m) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Max403 words
Crimson Silk Skillet Pasta This rich, comforting, and incredibly velvety pasta dish relies on the magic of emulsifying starchy pasta water with a simple tomato-butter sauce. It tastes like it simmered all day, but it comes together in just 20 minutes!
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Max484 words
This comprehensive 3-month longevity and performance protocol is designed for the advanced biohacker. It operates on the principles of hormesis, metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial biogenesis, and cellular senescence clearance. Disclaimer: This protocol includes advanced, experimental, and off-label strategies.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Max1,297 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920—perhaps through accelerated research into semiconductor crystal detectors at Bell Labs or RCA—the entire trajectory of the 20th century would have been pulled forward by roughly 27 years.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Hy3306 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Diet, Movement, and Sleep. The goal is to build sustainable habits, not perfection. Diet – Nourish Without Obsessing Focus: Add before you subtract; keep it practical.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.7 Max702 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build a foundation for long-term health and longevity. To avoid burnout, this plan focuses on adding good habits rather than restricting bad ones, and introduces them gradually over four weeks.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy3
Hy3
Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Hy3 costs 14x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Hy3
Input
$0.13
19× cheaper
Output
$0.53
14× cheaper
Qwen3.7 Max
Input
$2.50
Output
$7.50

Hy3 is cheaper on both: 19× input, 14× output.

Where to run it

7 hosts, cheapest first

Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Tencentfp8$0.08 in·$0.33 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.6% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·99.7% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up
Qwen3.7 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$1.48 in·$4.42 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Hy3 is developed by Tencent while Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Qwen. Hy3 has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.7 Max's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens and Qwen3.7 Max costs $2.5/M input tokens. Hy3 is $2.37/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Hy3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Hy3 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Hy3 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Max logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Qwen3.7 Max logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Max logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Hy3 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same size
Hy3 logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNew provider
Hy3 logoDevstral 2 2512 logo
Hy3 vs Devstral 2 2512Same size
Hy3 logoMistral Devstral Medium logo
Hy3 vs Mistral Devstral MediumNew provider

Model pages

Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.7 Max logo
Qwen3.7 Max58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed