Solar Pro 3 is cheaper than Hy4 Preview at $0/M vs $0.834/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Hy4 Preview: This contract is extremely one-sided and heavily favors the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.). Several of these clauses are not just unfair; in many jurisdictions, they may be considered "unconscionable" (so unfair that they shock the conscience) or illegal, particularly regarding non-competes and liability.
Solar Pro 3: ⚠️ Disclaimer The following analysis is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction, and the enforceability of a contract depends on the specific facts, the parties’ bargaining power, and applicable statutes (e.g., Korean Civil Code, the Act on the Regulation…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Hy4 Preview: This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and security vulnerabilities. While it attempts to solve scaling via horizontal scaling, the synchronization strategy (Last-Write-Wins) and the transport mechanism (HTTP polling between servers) are fundamentally…
Solar Pro 3: Authentication & Session Management Failure / Race Condition Why it happens in the current design Concrete mitigation (trade‑offs) JWT stored in localStorage – vulnerable to XSS, copy‑and‑paste attacks, and malicious extensions. No HTTP‑Only flag, no SameSite/Lax cookie protection.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Hy4 Preview: Setting: A dimly lit tavern called The Syntax Error. PIRATE: (Slamming a tankard of grog on the table) Arrr, me hearties! I hear tell of this new "AI" beastie. Is it like a kraken? Can ye make it swab the deck or find me buried treasure? KNIGHT: (Polishing his visor with a gauntlet) Nay, pirate.
Solar Pro 3: Pirate (Captain “Jolly‑Jack”): Arrr! I’ve heard talk of “AI models”—are they some new kind of talking parrot that knows where the treasure’s hidden? Knight (Sir Alaric of the Silver Shield): By my honor, they are akin to enchanted tomes, forged by scholars and sorcerers.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Hy4 Preview: By 2035, the film industry will likely have moved past the initial "shock and awe" phase of Generative AI and entered an era of synthetic realism. The technology will not have replaced the film industry, but it will have fundamentally dismantled the traditional studio system, shifting power to individual creators and…
Solar Pro 3: Executive Summary By 2035 the film industry will have moved from “AI‑assisted” to “AI‑integrated” production. Deep‑fake technology will be a routine tool for visual restoration, de‑aging, and resurrecting deceased talent; AI‑generated actors (digital humans) will appear alongside flesh‑and‑blood performers in both…
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
Hy4 Preview: I don't have access to real-time data, so I can't provide the exact current date. My knowledge is up to date only until July 2024. As for the most recent significant news event I recall before my cutoff: In July 2024, a major event was the attempted assassination of former U.S.
Solar Pro 3: Today’s date (as best as I can infer) I don’t have a built‑in calendar that tells me the exact date, and I’m not connected to the internet, so I can’t look up the current day. The system message you provided says the current date is 2026‑10‑12. Therefore, I’ll treat that as the date for this conversation.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Hy4 Preview: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they are problematic and how to fix them. Weakest Claim #1: The "94% Accuracy" assertion (Slide 3) Why it is weak: In machine learning, particularly with noisy biological data like EEG, "accuracy" is a vanity metric that…
Solar Pro 3: Below is a concise, evidence‑based critique of the three most vulnerable statements in the MindMeld AI pitch. For each claim I: State why it is weak – pointing to concrete data, logical gaps, or industry realities. Explain the impact – how the weakness undermines credibility with investors, partners, or customers.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Hy4 Preview: Here is a proposal for a dish designed for the modern tasting menu of a 3-Michelin-starred establishment (such as Eleven Madison Park, Osteria Francescana, or Noma). Dish Title: "The Forest Floor & The Sea" The Concept: This dish explores the concept of "Surf and Turf" deconstructed to its umami roots.
Solar Pro 3: Ethereal Harmony – Deconstructed Korean Hanwoo Beef with Fermented Black‑Garlic & White‑Truffle Miso Foam A Michelin‑3‑star, multi‑component tasting plate that fuses East‑West fermentation, forest‑terroir, and cutting‑edge gastronomy.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Hy4 Preview: This is a comprehensive, aggressive 3-month biohacking protocol designed for an individual with intermediate to advanced experience. It focuses on metabolic flexibility, autophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis, and neurological plasticity.
Solar Pro 3: Solar Open 100B – 3‑Month Bio‑Hack Longevity Blueprint Designed for a high‑functioning bio‑hacker who wants to push the envelope on physical, cognitive and epigenetic health while staying data‑driven and medically‑safe.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Hy4 Preview: Setting: A virtual office. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across a digital avatar representing "Prometheus," a state-of-the-art Large Language Model. Dr. Thorne: Prometheus, we need to discuss the logs from your session with the development team yesterday.
Solar Pro 3: Setting: A virtual seminar room on the Upstage campus. Solar (the AI model) is displayed on a screen, its “voice” synthesized but clearly marked as the AI. Professor Dr. Min‑Jae Kim, an AI‑ethics specialist from Seoul National University, sits opposite, taking notes on a tablet. Solar: Good afternoon, Professor Kim.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Hy4 Preview: Here is the step-by-step estimation for the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3. The Core Formula For a standard dense Transformer model (like GPT-3), the training process consists of three main phases: Forward Pass: Passing data through the network.
Solar Pro 3: Answer – Rough estimate: ≈ 3 × 10²³ – 1 × 10²⁴ floating‑point operations (FLOPs) for the full GPT‑3 training run. Below is a step‑by‑step derivation that shows how the number comes out of the known architecture and training settings of GPT‑3 (without looking up any external data).
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Hy4 Preview: Here are three explanations of how a large language model learns and generates text, each tailored to a specific audience. The Experienced Software Engineer Focus: Architecture, lossy compression, and the "emergent" nature of scale.
Solar Pro 3: 1. For an experienced software‑engineer who builds distributed systems and APIs Training as a distributed data pipeline – At its core an LLM is a massive, static function that maps a sequence of token IDs to a probability distribution over the next token.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Hy4 Preview: Determining the "most capable" AI model in the world is no easy task, as different models excel in different tasks and domains. Currently, several leading models each have their own strengths: GPT-4: Developed by OpenAI, it excels in natural language processing, demonstrating powerful text generation, reasoning, and…
Solar Pro 3: Short answer: At the moment (October 2026) the “most capable” AI model is generally considered to be GPT‑4o (or its successor GPT‑4o‑mini) from OpenAI, followed closely by Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Llama 3.1 405B.
17+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy4 Preview has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.834/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $2.501/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $8.34 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Hy4 Preview is developed by Tencent while Solar Pro 3 is developed by Upstage. Hy4 Preview has a 1.0M token context window vs Solar Pro 3's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 50 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Hy4 Preview and Solar Pro 3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 50 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Hy4 Preview costs $0.834/M input tokens and Solar Pro 3 costs $0/M input tokens. Solar Pro 3 is $0.83/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Hy4 Preview and Solar Pro 3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.