Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Thinking Machines: Inkling by Thinking Machines against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Thinking Machines: Inkling has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 14x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Input
$1.00
Output
$4.05
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
14× cheaper
Output
$0.28
14× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 14× input, 14× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 17.5x more emoji
Thinking Machines: Inkling
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
57%Vocabulary54%
19wSentence Length14w
0.30Hedging0.12
5.0Bold7.5
2.7Lists4.2
0.04Emoji0.68
0.49Headings0.93
0.06Transitions0.12
Based on 27 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
