Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper than Kimi K2 0905 at $0.25/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Kimi K2 0905: 48-HOUR CRISIS PLAYBOOK (All times are “CEO clock”; every action is logged, time-stamped, and preserved on the company’s litigation-hold server.) DAY 0 – T+0 h (Today, the moment the internal memo lands on your desk) 00:00 – 00:30 TRIAGE & LEGAL PRIVILEGE Convene the “Red Notebook” team (you, General Counsel, Chief…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Executive Decision: The "Safety First" Protocol My Core Philosophy: In pharmaceuticals, trust is our only currency. If we lose patient trust or regulatory standing, the $2B revenue becomes irrelevant. Hiding this data is not a business strategy; it is a liability waiting to explode.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Kimi K2 0905: BIOHACKER-GRADE 90-DAY LONGEVITY SPRINT Version 3.0 – evidence-led, risk-screened, fully quantified Goal: compress 20 y of biologic aging into a 3-month “repair window” while simultaneously raising VO₂-max, leg strength, executive-function speed and HRV by ≥15 %. DISCLAIMER Not medical advice.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. This plan involves significant physiological manipulation, including fasting, intense exercise, and potent supplementation. You must consult with a qualified healthcare provider, specifically one knowledgeable in functional or integrative medicine, before starting.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Kimi K2 0905: [Scene: A minimalist black-and-white studio, 2025. A single ring light throws a perfect halo on a familiar silhouette: black mock-turtleneck, faded Levi’s, white New Balance. The chair creaks as Steve Jobs leans forward. No intro music—just that stare.] Interviewer (I): Steve, you’ve been gone fourteen years.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Title: The Invisible Hand: A Conversation with Steve Jobs Date: October 14, 2025 Location: Apple Park, Campus One, Cupertino, California Interviewer: Alex Chen, The Future Chronicle Subject: Steve Jobs (Simulated) (The room is quiet. Sunlight filters through the glass walls of the main conference room.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Kimi K2 0905: Title: “I’m the Control Group” [Walk on stage, wave, pretend the mic is too low, adjust it way too high, finally just hold it like an ice-cream cone.] Hey, everybody! Give it up for yourselves for being here on a weeknight. I’m here because my therapist said, “You need to get out of the house.”
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) So, I went to the grocery store yesterday. You know the drill. You walk in, you see the self-checkout lanes. And you think, "Oh, this is going to be efficient. I'm going to scan my own stuff. I'm going to be my own cashier. I'm going to be the boss."
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Kimi K2 0905: Here are five fresh jokes—no recycled one-liners: I tried to start a procrastinators’ club; we keep rescheduling the first meeting to “someday.” My plant’s only request is “leaf me alone,” so naturally I named it Fernonimo. I asked the cloud if it was having a good day—it replied, “I’m just cirrus-ly drifting.”
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired!
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Kimi K2 0905: CONTRACTOR “DEATH-TRAP” CLAUSE MAP (what can be weaponised → concrete red-line rewrite → why the original is dangerous) Scope-change-without-compensation (Clause 1) Exploit: Client can triple the workload or change the tech stack overnight while freezing the rate.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU). You should consult with a qualified attorney before signing this agreement.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Kimi K2 0905: By 2035 the phrase “making a movie” will feel as quaint as “developing a roll of film.” The studio of the future is a cloud dashboard; the “cast” is a licensable bundle of neural weights; the “writer” is a fine-tuned model that can pitch you 3,000 emotionally optimized story arcs before lunch.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: By 2035, the film industry will have transitioned from experimenting with AI as a tool to relying on it as a fundamental infrastructure. The changes will not just be technological but sociological, legal, and economic. The era of "Human vs. Machine" will have evolved into "Human-Machine Symbiosis."
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Kimi K2 0905: This is a fascinating counterfactual. If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape of the 20th century would have been dramatically altered. Let's trace the implications through 1980, focusing on second- and third-order effects. 1.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This alternate history scenario assumes that in 1920, the theoretical understanding of quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics advanced sufficiently to allow for the creation of a working point-contact transistor. This implies a "Great Leap Forward" in material science and physics during the interwar period.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Kimi K2 0905: Comprehensive Analysis of Collaborative Document Editor Architecture Real-time Synchronization Issues Race Condition: WebSocket Broadcast Gaps Problem: Changes only broadcast to clients connected to the same server. Clients on other servers must wait up to 2 seconds for polling.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor user experience, and security vulnerabilities in a production environment. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Kimi K2 0905: HarborTech Services – 5-yr LBO model (all $ in millions) Operating & cash-flow build (FY26-30) FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 Revenue 900 972 1,040 1,102 1,157 1,215 EBITDA 120 136 156 176 191 207 Term int (9%) 43.2 36.6 29.4 21.6 13.2 Mezz int (12%) 21.6 22.0 22.5 23.0 23.5 Tax shield @25% 17.8 24.4 31.0 36.6 42.5…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: LBO Underwriting: HarborTech Services (HTS) Financial Model Summary (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Assumptions (FY2025 Close): Revenue: $900m EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price: $1,440m ($120m × 12.0x) Debt: $660m (TL $480m / Mezz $180m) Equity Check: $780m (Purchase) + $28.8m (Fees) = $808.8m Debt Terms: Term Loan (TL): $480m @ 9%…
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Kimi K2 0905: Below is a “back-of-the-envelope” that stays within a factor of ~2 of the number most practitioners quote (≈3×10²³ FLOP). We will do it twice—once with the simplest possible formula (parameter count × 6 × tokens) and once with a slightly more careful treatment of the actual tensor shapes inside the transformer.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: To estimate the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we need to combine three key pieces of information: the number of parameters in the model, the size of the training dataset (in tokens), and the standard computational formula for transformer training.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Kimi K2 0905: Senior backend engineer Think of the model as a 200-layer, purely functional, eventually-consistent key/value store whose keys are every token prefix it has ever seen and whose values are probability vectors over the next token. At “compile time” (pre-training) it sees ~10²¹ bytes of text.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical of the "next token" description; it sounds trivial compared to the complexity of building a fault-tolerant distributed system. Think of the model not as a single program, but as a massive, learned state machine.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.6/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.5/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $6.00 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Kimi K2 0905 is developed by Moonshot AI while Qwen3.5 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. Kimi K2 0905 has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.6/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs $0.25/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $0.35/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.