Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Kimi K2 Thinking by Moonshot AI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Kimi K2 Thinking
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi K2 Thinking has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
Input
$0.60
Output
$2.50
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
5.5× cheaper
Output
$0.60
4.2× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 5.5× input, 4.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
47%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Kimi K2 Thinking
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
57%Vocabulary56%
26wSentence Length14w
0.36Hedging0.37
5.8Bold5.7
6.0Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.56Headings0.70
0.06Transitions0.14
Based on 14 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
