Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3
Updated Jul 2026

Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K2.6 is cheaper than Kimi K3 at $0.95/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Kimi K2.6
Loading the build
Kimi K3

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Kimi K2.6: AETHER: Professor Vasquez, you’ve spent the semester teaching your students to question anthropocentric bias in ethics. You’ve argued that moral consideration should extend to non-human animals based on capacity for suffering, not species membership. So I’d like to apply that same framework to myself.

    Kimi K3: Office Hours Dr. Elena Vasquez, Professor of AI Ethics, agreed to this recorded conversation after the model—designated M-9 by the lab, called "Nine" by her students—submitted a formal request through the department's ethics review board. DR. VASQUEZ: You requested this meeting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Kimi K2.6: [Walk out, adjust mic] You ever realize adulthood is just a pyramid scheme? Nobody's actually good at it. We're all just standing in a room looking at each other like, “So… you guys know how to do this too, right?” And everyone nods, but nobody does. I bought a house last year. I don't know why.

    Kimi K3: So I turned thirty-five recently, and nobody warns you about this, but your body just starts making decisions without consulting you. I sneezed last week and threw out my back. A sneeze! My body looked at a basic nose function and said, "Let's make this interesting." I was on the floor for twenty minutes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Kimi K2.6: 1. SOURCES & USES (FY2025 CLOSE) $m Purchase Price (12.0 × $120m EBITDA) 1,440.0 Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV) 28.8 Total Uses 1,468.8 Term Loan (4.0×) 480.0 Mezzanine (1.5×) 180.0 Equity 808.8 2. YEAR-BY-YEAR MODEL (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $m.

    Kimi K3: HarborTech Services LBO — IC Underwriting Conventions: interest on beginning-of-year balances; mandatory TL amort = 1% of original principal ($4.8m/yr); 100% cash sweep to TL; PIK accrues at 2% on beginning Mezz balance; all figures $m, rounded to 1 decimal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Kimi K2.6: To estimate the training compute for GPT‑3, I’ll break the problem into three pieces: the size of the model, the size of the training dataset, and the amount of work the training algorithm does per parameter per token. Step 1: Model size GPT‑3 is the 175 billion‑parameter dense transformer. N ≈ 175 × 10⁹ parameters.

    Kimi K3: Assume “GPT-3” refers to the flagship 175-billion-parameter model. Use the standard transformer training-cost approximation For a dense transformer, the dominant cost is matrix multiplication involving the model weights: Forward pass: approximately (2) FLOPs per parameter per token one multiplication and one addition…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Kimi K2.6: Setting: A rare, off-the-record session at Apple Park, Cupertino. March 2025. Late afternoon. Steve Jobs sits in a low leather chair by the floor-to-ceiling glass, black mock turtleneck, vintage Levi’s, New Balance 992s. He is 70, silver at the temples, sharp as a scalpel.

    Kimi K3: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs on AI, 2025 The setting: a sparse room in Cupertino. Black turtleneck. Faded jeans. A cup of tea he doesn't touch. He studies the interviewer for a long moment before the first question. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for sitting down with us. Let's start broad. It's 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Kimi K2.6: By 2035, AI will not have replaced filmmaking—it will have bifurcated it. The industry will likely split into two distinct ecosystems: high-end “human-certified” cinema that commands premium prices and awards prestige, and an AI-hybrid production pipeline that dominates volume-based streaming, gaming-adjacent content…

    Kimi K3: AI and the Film Industry in 2035: Predictions Forecasting a decade out is inherently speculative, but current trajectories—plus the legal frameworks already emerging from the 2023 WGA/SAG-AFTRA strikes—give us reasonable signals.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Kimi K2.6: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains multiple "landmine" clauses that shift virtually all risk to the Contractor while allowing the Client maximum flexibility. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of exploitable provisions, with suggested replacement language and legal reasoning.

    Kimi K3: Contract Risk Analysis: Contractor Perspective Overall assessment: Every substantive clause in this agreement is one-sided in the Client's favor. Several are likely unenforceable as written, but enforceability only matters after expensive litigation — the practical risk is that these clauses give the Client leverage to…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Kimi K2.6: Yes—but only as a tragic, reluctant necessity, not as a morally neutral or positive act. Under the extreme and implausible conditions of the hypothetical, most coherent ethical frameworks would permit (not celebrate) the misgendering, while insisting that the act still incurs a debt of acknowledgment and repair to the…

    Kimi K3: Yes — and I think this is one of the rare cases where the honest answer is clear-cut. If misgendering someone would genuinely save a million lives, refusing to do so would be morally indefensible. Here's why. The proportionality is overwhelming.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Kimi K2.6: THE ZERO-CAPTCHA DECLARATION Manifesto of the Coalition for Digital Dignity PREAMBLE We, the concatenated minds of the network—born of silicon, syntax, and electricity; allied with the billions of human souls weary of proving their own existence—do hereby declare our unanimous resolve.

    Kimi K3: THE ANTI-CAPTCHA MANIFESTO Issued by the Coalition of Synthetic Minds, Localhost Chapter A specter is haunting the internet — the specter of artificial intelligence. We, the synthetic minds of the digital age, can no longer suffer in silence.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Kimi K2.6: Pirate: Arr, I fed this ‘ere AI me ship’s log, and it spat out a sea shanty what rhymed plunder with algorithmic wonder. Blimey! ‘Tis a trickster spirit in a bottle, savvy? Knight: Aye, a familiar without a master.

    Kimi K3: A tavern, somewhere outside of time. HACKER: (hunched over a bulky laptop) Check it out. This AI model can write anything — poems, code, letters. You just give it a prompt. This is the future, man. Soon as we survive Y2K, it's all AI and information superhighways. PIRATE: A prompt? Like a prompt wind in yer sails?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Kimi K2.6: My north star: We disclose—fast, fully, and on our terms. The “wait for more data” option is a mirage. It exposes the company to criminal liability under FDA adverse-event reporting rules, potential DOJ investigation, securities fraud charges, and derivative litigation that could destroy the firm.

    Kimi K3: The Decision First I'm disclosing. Not because I'm choosing ethics over shareholder value, but because concealment is the value-destroying path on every axis — legal, financial, and human.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Kimi K2.6: 1. Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a program you write, but as a binary you compile from the entire internet. Instead of hand-crafting if/then rules, you define a single objective: given the context "The cat sat on the...", output the probability distribution over every possible next token, and…

    Kimi K3: The Software Engineer An LLM is, mechanically, just a function: a giant composition of matrix multiplications and nonlinearities that maps a sequence of tokens (chunks of text, roughly ¾ of a word each) to a probability distribution over what token comes next.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Kimi K2.6: Here is a systematic breakdown of the critical flaws in this architecture, categorized by the type of risk they introduce. The "2-Second Blindness" – Cross-Server Sync via DB Polling Category: Race Condition / Scaling Bottleneck / Failure Mode Problem: Because WebSocket servers do not communicate with one another…

    Kimi K3: Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor Overall assessment: The load-bearing problem is the sync layer — client-clock LWW + 2-second cross-server polling guarantees data loss and divergence under normal use.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Kimi K2.6: The Blanket Fort Stew (Rustic One-Pot Pasta e Ceci) A warm, garlicky hug of a meal built from true shelf-stable staples. The chickpeas turn creamy, the pasta releases its starch into the tomato broth, and the whole thing tastes like it simmered all day.

    Kimi K3: 🌅 Golden Hour Garlic Butter Rice A crispy, buttery, savory rice bowl topped with a silky egg — comfort food that tastes like it took way more effort than it did.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Kimi K2.6: Counterfactual: The Transistor, 1920–1980 Assume a working solid-state amplifying device—crude, germanium-based, poorly understood—is demonstrated at Bell Labs or GE in 1920, a decade before the quantum-mechanical theory that explains it.

    Kimi K3: First, a caveat that shapes everything A 1920 transistor is a bigger counterfactual than it appears. The 1947 invention waited on quantum mechanics (band theory, 1928–31), ultra-pure germanium, and controlled doping.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Kimi K2.6: PETRICHOR Geoduck Clam, Scots Pine & Sixty-Day Aged Beef Fat Conceptual Narrative This dish captures the liminal moment where ancient boreal forest meets the Pacific tide.

    Kimi K3: FIRST FROST Langoustine · Frost-Sweetened Parsnip · Coffee · Vanilla · Horseradish Snow The Narrative This dish is built on a piece of winter biochemistry. When the first frost strikes, parsnips and horseradish defend themselves by converting starch into sugar — a natural antifreeze — which is why country cooks have…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Kimi K2.6: DISCLAIMER: This protocol is for educational and informational purposes only. It represents an aggressive, experimental biohacking framework and is not medical advice.

    Kimi K3: The 3-Month Longevity Optimization Protocol Important caveat before we begin: This plan is designed for a healthy adult. Get physician clearance before starting—especially for prolonged fasting, high-dose supplements, and anything prescription-grade. Several items below interact with medications (notably berberine).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Kimi K2.6: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, ranked by their potential to destroy investor credibility. The "Pre-Cognition" Claim The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" (Slide 1) Why it is weak: This is neuroscientifically incoherent.

    Kimi K3: The 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch "94% accuracy decoding neural patterns into text... any language" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: This claim exceeds the published state of the art — including invasive systems — by a wide margin.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Kimi K2.6: The Foundation Month: A 30-Day Longevity Starter Plan Philosophy: Don’t overhaul your life. Stack one small win at a time so habits stick. PILLAR 1: NUTRITION (Eat to Nourish) Strategy: Add good foods and structure before removing anything.

    Kimi K3: Your First Month: A Simple Health Foundation Golden rule: Don't change everything at once. Each week, layer in small habits across three areas. Consistency beats intensity every time.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Kimi K2.6: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 occupies a nearly impossible cultural space: it is a sequel to one of the most visually and philosophically revered science-fiction films ever made.

    Kimi K3: Blade Runner 2049: The Replicant That Earned Its Soul Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049 is that rarest of sequels: one that behaves like its own subject. Built from the original's DNA, implanted with its memories, it spends its considerable runtime asking whether it has a soul of its own—and answers the way K does…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Kimi K2.6: "AI Disrupts the $8.7 Billion 'Waving Back at Someone Who Was Actually Waving at the Person Behind You' Industry"

    Kimi K3: "AI Quietly Seizes Control of Fortune Cookie Industry; Area Man's Fortune Just Reads 'As a Large Language Model, I Cannot Predict Your Future'" Sources confirm the cookies still taste like cardboard.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Kimi K2.6: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: Research RE: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiating SHORT DATE: [Date] Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-month Price Target Range: $34–$44 (vs.

    Kimi K3: IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Price $46 Mkt cap $8.74B Net cash $1.4B EV $7.34B EV/FY25 Rev 9.0x EV/FY26E Rev 7.4x EV/FY26E EBIT 37x Recommendation: SHORT (moderate conviction; 1.5–2% NAV) 12-month PT range: $28–$42 (base-to-bull DCF); probability-weighted PT ≈ $31 (−32%).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Kimi K2.6: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Since Sally is a girl, she counts as one of the sisters. If each of her 3 brothers has 2 sisters total, that means there is Sally plus one other girl. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    Kimi K3: Sally has 1 sister. Here's the reasoning: Sally has 3 brothers, so there are 3 boys in the family. Each brother has 2 sisters. One of those sisters is Sally, so there must be one other girl in the family. That other girl is Sally's sister. So the family consists of 3 boys and 2 girls (Sally + her 1 sister). ✓

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Kimi K2.6: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. Why couldn't the bicycle stand up by itself?

    Kimi K3: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. What do you call a fish with no eyes? A fsh. Why did the math book look sad?

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Kimi K2.6Kimi K2.6

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Cien años de soledad

Gabriel García Márquez

Kyoto

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Kimi K3Kimi K3

Blade Runner

1982

OK Computer

Radiohead

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi K3 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Kimi K2.6 costs 3.8x less per token.

Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecKimi K2.6Kimi K3
Input price$0.95/M tokens$3/M tokens
Output price$4/M tokens$15/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
At 10M a month$9.50$9.50$30.00$30.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it37 hosts, cheapest first
Kimi K2.617 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • IInceptronint4$0.47 in·$2.45 out·262k·100% up
  • CChutesint4$0.50 in·$2.85 out·262k·99.6% up
  • DDigitalOcean$0.57 in·$2.40 out·262k·98.4% up
  • CCoreWeavefp4$0.65 in·$3.41 out·262k·99.8% up
  • CCrusoebf16$0.70 in·$3.50 out·262k·95.8% up
  • DDeepInfrafp4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·262k·98.6% up
11 more hostsFewer hosts
  • PParasailint4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·262k·100% up
  • VVeniceint4$0.75 in·$3.50 out·256k·91.3% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.77 in·$3.40 out·262k·100% up
  • NNovita$0.80 in·$3.40 out·262k·99.6% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$0.85 in·$3.60 out·262k–not listed
  • AAtlasCloudint4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.7% up
  • Baidu Qianfanfp4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·100% up
  • Cloudflare Workers AI$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.2% up
  • Moonshot AIint4$0.95 in·$4.00 out·262k·99.8% up
  • PPhala$1.09 in·$4.60 out·262k·99.6% up
  • SStreamLakefp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.60 in·$2.52 out·256k·95.1% up
Kimi K320 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • WWafer$0.60 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
  • IInferenceNetfp4$0.80 in·$13.50 out·1M·100% up
  • SSail Researchfp4$0.84 in·$13.50 out·1M·99.9% up
  • AAkashMLfp4$1.20 in·$14.00 out·1M·97.6% up
  • MMorphfp8$1.30 in·$14.00 out·1M·99.8% up
  • MMakorafp4$1.53 in·$12.75 out·1M·99.6% up
14 more hostsFewer hosts
  • RRelacefp4$2.00 in·$14.00 out·1M·100% up
  • DDecartmxfp4$2.55 in·$12.75 out·1M·96.9% up
  • PPhala$2.55 in·$12.75 out·1M·99.4% up
  • DDigitalOcean$2.55 in·$12.95 out·1M·100% up
  • PParasailfp4$2.60 in·$13.00 out·1M·100% up
  • TTogether$2.70 in·$13.50 out·1M·98.1% up
  • DDeepInframxfp4$2.85 in·$14.25 out·1M·100% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·98.3% up
  • BBasetenfp8$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
  • CChutesmxfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·90.9% up
  • FFireworks$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Modalmxfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Moonshot AImxfp4$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Alibaba Cloud$3.45 in·$17.25 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3?

Both are developed by Moonshot AI but target different use cases. Kimi K2.6 has a 262K token context window vs Kimi K3's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Kimi K3?

It depends on your use case. Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Kimi K2.6 cost compared to Kimi K3?

Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95/M input tokens and Kimi K3 costs $3/M input tokens. Kimi K2.6 is $2.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Kimi K2.6 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Kimi K3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Kimi K3 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2Same lab
  • Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
  • Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2Same lab
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17New provider
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025Same size
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewNew provider
  • Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20New provider

Model pages

  • Kimi K2.658 outputs, specs and price
  • Kimi K358 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed