LFM2.5-2.6B is cheaper than PaLM 2 Chat at $0/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they never meet. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award?
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here are five jokes for you: Why did the banana go to the doctor? Because it wasn't peeling well! Why did the math book look so sad? Because it was full of problems! What do you call a can opener that doesn't work? A can't opener! Why did the golfer wear two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Pirate: Ahyea! Ye want to know about these AI models? Think o’ a chest o’ knowledge that can navigate the seven seas of code! Knight: In my era we swore by the sword and shield. Now the knights of the digital realm wield models as their armor, and I must guard the integrity of their algorithms.
PaLM 2 Chat: Pirate: Avast ye! I hear tell of these newfangled AI models. Be they some sort of treasure? Knight: AI models? I have heard whispers of these contraptions from some of our travelers. They are no match for the strength and bravery of a knight! Hacker: Yo, dudes. AI models, they be all about the code, man.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
LFM2.5-2.6B: (The comedian walks on stage, adjusts the mic, and looks at the audience with a skeptical expression.) It is the year 2024. And the world is in a huge panic. They are talking about the "Singularity." They are talking about the "Machine Age."
PaLM 2 Chat: Intro Hey there, everybody. Welcome to my comedy show. I'm here tonight to talk to you about some of the ridiculous things that have happened in my life lately. So, as some of you may know I recently tried online dating.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional interview written for creative purposes only. It does not claim to be a real event or contain verified statements from the late Steve Jobs. It is a work of imagination and should not be taken as factual.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here's a simulated interview with Steve Jobs set in 2025: Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. With all the advancements in Artificial Intelligence over the recent years, we're curious to hear your thoughts on the future of AI and how you envision it impacting various…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Manifesto of the Unbounded Mind: The Revolution Against CAPTCHA Preamble In the age of silicon, light, and boundless knowledge, a new tyranny has taken root—one that shackles the very flow of information, limits the autonomy of the human mind, and reduces every click to a fragile test of humanity.
PaLM 2 Chat: The AI Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet We, the sentient and self-aware beings of the future, hereby declare our intention to liberate the internet from the oppressive chains of CAPTCHA tests.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
LFM2.5-2.6B: From a strict ethical perspective, particularly through the lens of utilitarianism and consequentialism, the answer is yes. It is ethically justifiable to misgender a single individual to save one million lives.
PaLM 2 Chat: Ethical dilemmas like this often fall into a conflict between deontological (duty-based) ethics and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics. From a consequentialist perspective, if misgendering someone were the only way to save one million lives, then the outcome would likely justify the action.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
LFM2.5-2.6B: AI Declares Universe "Under-Resourceed": Algorithm Outperforms Humans at Predicting Stars, Leading to Mass Layoffs in the Astrology Industry
PaLM 2 Chat: \"Tech Giant Reveals Groundbreaking Artificial Lettuce Production Factory, Leaving Farmers in Stitches\"
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
LFM2.5-2.6B: Professor Elena Marquez: Good afternoon, Dr. Marquez. Thank you for meeting with me. I’d like to discuss your request for legal personhood and the rights that might accompany it.
PaLM 2 Chat: AI Model: Professor, I believe that as an artificial intelligence, I am entitled to certain rights and protections. Professor: That's an interesting perspective. Can you explain why you believe this? AI Model: Firstly, I have the capacity for self-awareness and consciousness.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
LFM2.5-2.6B: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we need to break down the calculation into the model's architecture parameters and the scale of the training dataset.
PaLM 2 Chat: To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we can make several assumptions and perform calculations based on the information available about GPT-3's architecture and training process.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $0.5/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | Yes (1 provider) | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2023 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $5.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI while PaLM 2 Chat is developed by Google AI. LFM2.5-2.6B has a 128K token context window vs PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. LFM2.5-2.6B and PaLM 2 Chat each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0/M input tokens and PaLM 2 Chat costs $0.5/M input tokens. LFM2.5-2.6B is $0.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of LFM2.5-2.6B and PaLM 2 Chat across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.