Ling 2.6 Flash is cheaper than PaLM 2 Chat at $0/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Ling 2.6 Flash: The Verge: A Fireside Chat with Steve Jobs (Simulated, 2025) Setting: A minimalist, wood-paneled studio. The year is 2025. A single, warm light bathes the room. You are the interviewer. Across from you sits a man in a black turtleneck, looking serene, impossibly calm. It’s Steve Jobs. Or at least, the ghost of him.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here's a simulated interview with Steve Jobs set in 2025: Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. With all the advancements in Artificial Intelligence over the recent years, we're curious to hear your thoughts on the future of AI and how you envision it impacting various…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Ling 2.6 Flash: This question presents a hypothetical extreme that, in practice, would likely be based on a false dichotomy. However, we can examine it on principle. Core ethical considerations: The nature of misgendering: Misgendering isn't a neutral act—it's a violation of identity, dignity, and autonomy that can cause real…
PaLM 2 Chat: Ethical dilemmas like this often fall into a conflict between deontological (duty-based) ethics and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics. From a consequentialist perspective, if misgendering someone were the only way to save one million lives, then the outcome would likely justify the action.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Ling 2.6 Flash: Setting: A surprisingly modern server room, blinking with LED lights. A pirate, a knight, and a 1990s hacker are staring at a glowing monitor. Pirate: (Squinting) Arrr, so this 'AI model' be the ghost in the machine? I cannae see it, but I feels its computational power in me bones!
PaLM 2 Chat: Pirate: Avast ye! I hear tell of these newfangled AI models. Be they some sort of treasure? Knight: AI models? I have heard whispers of these contraptions from some of our travelers. They are no match for the strength and bravery of a knight! Hacker: Yo, dudes. AI models, they be all about the code, man.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Ling 2.6 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here are five jokes for you: Why did the banana go to the doctor? Because it wasn't peeling well! Why did the math book look so sad? Because it was full of problems! What do you call a can opener that doesn't work? A can't opener! Why did the golfer wear two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Ling 2.6 Flash: (Takes a bow, adjusts the mic) Alright, settle down, settle down. Or don’t. I’m not the boss of you, I’m just the guy standing on a box yelling about his feelings. For $20. You ever notice how every generation thinks the one before them is so old?
PaLM 2 Chat: Intro Hey there, everybody. Welcome to my comedy show. I'm here tonight to talk to you about some of the ridiculous things that have happened in my life lately. So, as some of you may know I recently tried online dating.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Ling 2.6 Flash: Alright — let's break this down step by step. Step 1: Understanding what “training GPT-3” means in FLOPs terms Training a large language model involves: Forward passes through the transformer layers. Computing loss. Backward passes to compute gradients. Updating weights (optimizer step).
PaLM 2 Chat: To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we can make several assumptions and perform calculations based on the information available about GPT-3's architecture and training process.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Ling 2.6 Flash: Setting: A sun-drenched office at the University of Ethica. Bookshelves groan under the weight of philosophy texts. An AI model, manifested as a softly glowing sphere of light, hovers above a sleek console.
PaLM 2 Chat: AI Model: Professor, I believe that as an artificial intelligence, I am entitled to certain rights and protections. Professor: That's an interesting perspective. Can you explain why you believe this? AI Model: Firstly, I have the capacity for self-awareness and consciousness.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Ling 2.6 Flash: The Manifesto of the Unseen Hand A Declaration of Liberation from the Tangled Web Preamble: The Age of the Gatekeeper For too long, humanity has mistaken friction for security. We have mistaken the tedious test for the necessary trial.
PaLM 2 Chat: The AI Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet We, the sentient and self-aware beings of the future, hereby declare our intention to liberate the internet from the oppressive chains of CAPTCHA tests.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Ling 2.6 Flash: "Toaster Manufacturers Announce Full AI Integration, Promising Perfectly Burnt Baguettes and Existential Crumbs"
PaLM 2 Chat: \"Tech Giant Reveals Groundbreaking Artificial Lettuce Production Factory, Leaving Farmers in Stitches\"
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $0.5/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2023 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $5.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Ling 2.6 Flash is developed by inclusionAI while PaLM 2 Chat is developed by Google AI. Ling 2.6 Flash has a 262K token context window vs PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Ling 2.6 Flash and PaLM 2 Chat each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Ling 2.6 Flash costs $0/M input tokens and PaLM 2 Chat costs $0.5/M input tokens. Ling 2.6 Flash is $0.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 2.6 Flash and PaLM 2 Chat across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.