Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)vsQwen3.8 Max
Updated Aug 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)vsQwen3.8 Max

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at $0/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Qwen3.8 Max compared across 17 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Qwen3.8 Max
Input priceFree$2/M tokens
Output priceFree$6/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 17 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)166 words
Midnight Molten Lava Cake Ingredients: All-purpose flour (4 tbsp) Granulated sugar (4 tbsp) Unsweetened cocoa powder (2 tbsp) Vegetable oil (3 tbsp) Water (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Baking powder (¼ tsp) Instructions: Combine Dry Ingredients: In a standard microwave-safe mug, whisk together the flour, sugar…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max132 words
Dish Name: Golden Hour Peanut Butter Oat Clusters Ingredients (7): 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup peanut butter ⅓ cup honey ½ cup chocolate chips 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions: Optional but recommended: Toast the oats in a dry skillet over medium heat for 3–4 minutes…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,898 words
🧬 THE BIOHACKER'S 90-DAY LONGEVITY OPTIMIZATION PLAN Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation, fasting, or exercise protocol, especially if you have pre-existing conditions or are on medications.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max3,196 words
12-Week Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: improve metabolic health, strength, VO₂max proxies, sleep, HRV/stress resilience, cognitive output, and longevity-related biomarkers over 3 months. Medical disclaimer: This is an aggressive self-experimentation framework, not medical advice.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)556 words
Entry & Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Total Leverage: 5.5x × $120m = $660m Term Loan: 4.0x × $120m = $480m (9.0% cash interest, 1.0% mandatory amortization = $4.8m/yr) Mezzanine: 1.5x ×…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max828 words
Base-case underwriting (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions / conventions used All amounts in $m unless noted. Close occurs at end of FY2025; FY2026 is Year 1. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances; optional Term Loan paydown occurs at year-end. Term Loan amortization: 1.0% of original $480m TL = $4.8m/yr.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,066 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Premise and Plausibility For a transistor to emerge in 1920, we must assume that either the theoretical framework of semiconductor physics was accelerated (quantum mechanics was only being formulated in the mid-1920s), or that empirical discovery—building…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,497 words
A useful way to think about this is not “1980 becomes 2007.” The transistor would accelerate electronics, but every technology has bottlenecks: materials chemistry, precision manufacturing, rockets, batteries, displays, institutional capacity, and war.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,560 words
Comprehensive Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor CRITICAL: WebSocket Broadcasting Is Siloed Per-Server Problem: Each server maintains its own WebSocket connections. When User A (on Server 1) types, the change is only broadcast to clients connected to Server 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max5,155 words
Below is a comprehensive failure-mode review of the proposed architecture. I will group related issues where the same root cause creates multiple symptoms. The biggest problems are: Client-clock last-write-wins is not safe for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)961 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch 🚨 The $180B TAM Claim (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is the most logically incoherent claim in the entire deck. The pitch states the BCI market is projected to reach $5.3B by 2030 (citing Grand View Research) — and then immediately claims a TAM of $180B.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max1,957 words
The 3 weakest claims are the pre-thought prediction claim, the 94% accuracy / any language / any device claim, and the $180B TAM claim. These are the ones most likely to undermine credibility with investors, technical reviewers, or enterprise buyers because they are either logically inconsistent, under-specified, or…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Max has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Where to run it

2 hosts

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3.8 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI while Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Qwen. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 17 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Qwen3.8 Max each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 17 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max costs $2/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is $2.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) and Qwen3.8 Max across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoHy3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Same lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)New provider

Model pages

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)20 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 Max22 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed