Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)vso1
Updated Sep 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)vso1

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is cheaper than o1 at $0/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and o1 compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free)o1
Input priceFree$15/M tokens
Output priceFree$60/M tokens
Context window262K tokens128K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedSep 2026Dec 2024
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 2 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)437 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo Confidential – For Internal Use Only 1) Recommendation & Thesis Pass (bias cautious). 12-month PT: $32–$48. Thesis: LLLT has defensible mid-market AP lock-in and solid NRR, but at $46 the stock trades above DCF-implied value ($28 base) and only just clears comps on revenue multiples; we need…
Read the full answer
o1820 words
RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)349 words
HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwriting Entry Summary Item Value FY2025 Revenue / EBITDA $900m / $120m Purchase EV (12.0x) $1,440m Transaction fees (2%) $28.8m → equity Term Loan (4.0x) $480m @ 9% cash, 1% amort Mezzanine (1.5x) $180m @ 12% cash + 2% PIK Equity invested $808.8m Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–FY2030)…
Read the full answer
o11,012 words
Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
o1
o1Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
o1
Input
$15.00
Output
$60.00
Where to run it

2 hosts

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
o11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$15.00 in·$60.00 out·200k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is developed by inclusionAI while o1 is developed by OpenAI. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) has a 262K token context window vs o1's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and o1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) costs $0/M input tokens and o1 costs $15/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) is $15.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) and o1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
o1 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
o1 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoHy3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
o1 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
o1 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
o1 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
o1 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
o1 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
o1 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash VL (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL (free)Same lab
o1 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
o1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame lab
o1 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
o1 vs GPT-6 AstraSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen3.5 27BNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logoQwen3.5 35B A3B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) vs Qwen3.5 35B A3BNew provider

Model pages

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)19 outputs, specs and price
o1 logo
o159 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed