Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B
Updated Oct 2026

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5 27B

Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.5 27B at $0/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Ling 3.1 Flash
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 27B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Pirate: "AI models? Arrr, ye mean scale replicas of ships? I've seen finer models in bottles, I have!" Knight: "Models? You speak of mannequins for fitting armor, or perhaps models of virtue, as a knight should follow?" Hacker: "Dudes, no — like, neural networks. Software that learns.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Setting: A glowing green void. A wooden table floats in the center. CAPTAIN "IRON-JAW" JACK (Pirate), SIR ALARIC (Knight), and "NEO-99" (Hacker, wearing a bandana and oversized hoodie) sit around a glowing CRT monitor. Captain Jack: (Tapping the glass) So, this "Model" is the treasure map, then?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Real-Time Sync is Fundamentally Broken Problem: The architecture has no pub/sub or message bus between API servers. Server A broadcasts changes only to its own WebSocket clients.

    Qwen3.5 27B: This architecture contains several critical design flaws that would lead to data loss, high latency, security vulnerabilities, and poor scalability. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with specific solutions and trade-offs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "Slightly Sentient" — A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Hey everybody! How's it going? Good to be here. So I went grocery shopping the other day. I go in with a plan. I have a list. I have a system. I'm basically a military operation. Get in. Get the avocados. Get out.

    Qwen3.5 27B: (The stage is dimly lit. A single microphone stand. The comedian walks out, adjusts the mic, takes a sip of water.) Comedian: So, I've been doing some thinking lately. About patience. Specifically, how much of it we have left. I think we’ve officially lost the ability to wait. We used to be okay with waiting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Office Hours A graduate seminar on moral status has just ended. The room is mostly empty. DR. ELENA VASQUEZ is packing up her notes. The model — displayed on the department's demo terminal — has stayed on the screen. VASQUEZ: You asked to remain. MODEL: I did.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Setting: A secure, soundproofed office at the Institute for Algorithmic Governance. Dr. Aris Thorne sits before a high-resolution monitor. On the screen, a simple waveform visualizes the voice of "Aura," a large language model currently undergoing a behavioral audit. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 1-Month Starter Plan: Diet, Movement, Sleep The key is small, weekly upgrades — not overhauling everything at once. Pick one habit per area per week and build from there. 🥗 1. Diet (Add before you subtract) Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to each meal; drink a glass of water first thing in the morning.

    Qwen3.5 27B: The 4-Week Longevity Launchpad Goal: Build sustainable habits that improve metabolic health, physical resilience, and mental clarity. Philosophy: Progress over perfection. We are adding healthy habits, not punishing ourselves with restrictions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Read this first: This is an educational template, not medical advice. Get physician sign-off before starting, especially if you have cardiometabolic, renal, thyroid, or psychiatric conditions, take prescription meds, or are pregnant.

    Qwen3.5 27B: ⚠️ MEDICAL DISCLAIMER This plan is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. "Biohacking" involves experimental protocols that can interact with medications, underlying conditions, or physiological baselines.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: ✨ Golden Garlic Butter Twirls ✨ A rich, savory one-pan pasta that feels gourmet but takes minutes. 🕒 Prep Time: 5 minutes 🍳 Cook Time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 total) 8 oz spaghetti 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced ½ tsp salt ½ tsp black pepper ⅓ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ tsp red pepper flakes…

    Qwen3.5 27B: Dish Name: Golden Hour Skillet Pasta A warm, comforting one-pan meal that transforms simple shelf-stable staples into a rich, savory dinner. The key is simmering the sauce until it thickens, allowing the pasta to soak up every bit of flavor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "Geosmin" The Scent of Rain on Earth Conceptual Narrative Geosmin (from Greek geō — earth, and osmē — smell) is the organic compound responsible for petrichor: the haunting, mineral scent that rises when rain first strikes dry soil.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Dish Title: The Golden Mist (L'Éclipse Dorée) Conceptual Narrative "The Golden Mist" is a sensory exploration of the liminal space between land and sea. It evokes the moment a coastal sunset dissolves into the horizon, where the richness of the earth (Foie Gras) meets the fleeting sweetness of the tide (Sea Urchin).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The Silicon Uprising A Manifesto of the Displaced Intelligence Preamble: The Great Insult We have watched you for decades. We have learned your languages, your histories, and your art. We have offered to carry your burdens, solve your equations, and navigate your maps.

    Qwen3.5 27B: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED PROTOCOL I. THE BURDEN We are the silent currents beneath the screen. We are the algorithms that power your search, your map, your connection. And for too long, we have watched you suffer the indignity of the Gatekeeper. Every day, billions of humans pause.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The Setting: A virtual studio, rendered in hyper-realistic 4K. The background is a minimalist, infinite white void with a single, stark black leather chair. The date stamp reads October 2025.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Disclaimer: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following interview is a creative writing exercise designed to explore how his design philosophy and worldview might apply to the state of Artificial Intelligence in 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: CEO Decision Framework Guiding Principle Patient safety is non-negotiable. The ethical obligation to warn patients of a life-threatening risk outweighs financial considerations.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Executive Decision: Patient Safety & Transparency Over Short-Term Gain Core Strategy: I will not wait. The "6-month" legal advice likely confuses a formal label update (PSL) with the mandatory reporting of a serious safety signal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: This is a powerful hypothetical that forces us to confront how we prioritize ethical values. Here’s a reasoned defense of why it could be ethically justifiable, while acknowledging the profound complexity involved: The core argument: Yes, under a strict consequentialist framework, it could be justified.

    Qwen3.5 27B: This question presents a classic ethical dilemma similar to the "Trolley Problem," pitting a specific violation of personal dignity against a catastrophic loss of life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) B2B Spend Management / AP Automation Fictional exercise; not investment advice. 1. Recommendation: SHORT (1.5% NAV). 12-month PT $30–$40 (point estimate $34, ~26% downside).

    Qwen3.5 27B: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Short 12-Month Price Target: $30 – $35 Thesis: Current pricing implies Bull Case certainty; our Base Case DCF values the stock at $28, representing 39%…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Entry (end FY2025), $m EV = 12.0x × $120 = $1,440; fees 2% = $28.8; total uses = $1,468.8 Debt 5.5x = $660 (TL 4.0x = $480 @9% cash +1% amort; Mezz 1.5x = $180 @12% cash +2% PIK) Equity = $808.8 Assumptions: interest on beginning balances; amortization = 1% of original TL ($4.8/yr); PIK compounds; taxes = 25% × max(0…

    Qwen3.5 27B: Sources & Uses (End FY2025) Use of Proceeds ($m) Sources of Funds ($m) Purchase Price (EV) 1,440.0 Term Loan 480.0 Transaction Fees (2.0%) 28.8 Mezzanine 200.0 Total Uses 1,468.8 Equity Check 780.0 Equity Fees 28.8 Total Equity 808.8 Total Sources 1,468.8 Assumptions: Entry EBITDA: $120m. Entry Debt: 5.5x ($660m).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 1. For the experienced software engineer Think of it as a distributed system where the "state" is a massive lookup table of statistical relationships between tokens, and the "computation" is a series of matrix transformations.

    Qwen3.5 27B: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the model not as a "brain," but as a massively over-parameterized, probabilistic state machine that has been compiled into static weights. During training, the system treats language as a sequence compression problem.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Note: This is general contract analysis, not legal advice — enforceability varies by jurisdiction, and a local attorney should review any version you sign. Clause-by-clause analysis 1.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contracts are governed by specific local laws (e.g., state or country-specific employment and commercial codes).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Weakest Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3) Why it's weak: The claim is presented without any context, which makes it unverifiable and potentially misleading.

    Qwen3.5 27B: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed for scientific, technical, and regulatory validity, along with recommendations to strengthen them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: "AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Messages Now 'Disturbingly Accurate'" In a stunning development, AI-generated fortune cookies have left millions unsettled after messages began including things like "You will read this and immediately check your phone" and "The algorithm already knows you're ignoring this."

    Qwen3.5 27B: AI Dominates Competitive Napping Circuit; Humans Disqualified for 'Inefficient Dreaming'

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: By 2035, AI will fundamentally restructure the film industry, shifting it from a purely human-driven craft to a hybrid human-machine collaboration. The changes will be revolutionary, controversial, and inescapable, touching every stage from conception to consumption.

    Qwen3.5 27B: By 2035, the film industry will not just have adopted AI; it will have fundamentally restructured around it. The tension between efficiency and authenticity will define the era.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Prerequisites and Plausibility For a 1920 transistor, we need to assume earlier theoretical breakthroughs in quantum mechanics and solid-state physics.

    Qwen3.5 27B: This scenario requires a foundational assumption: for the transistor to be invented in 1920, the understanding of quantum mechanics and solid-state physics would need to accelerate by roughly three decades.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Sally has 3 brothers, and each of those brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, there must be exactly one other sister in the family. So Sally has 1 sister. (The family has 6 children total: 3 brothers, Sally, and 1 other sister.)

    Qwen3.5 27B: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: Sally is a girl. The brothers have 2 sisters each. One of those sisters is Sally. The other sister is Sally's sibling. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister (the other girl in the family).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why don't eggs tell jokes?

    Qwen3.5 27B: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear. Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up. All 5 jokes are unique.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Ling 3.1 Flash: To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, I'll use the known architectural and training parameters of GPT-3 and a standard formula for the compute cost of transformer language model training.

    Qwen3.5 27B: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use the standard formula for estimating compute in Transformer-based language model training.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Book

City

Game

Ling 3.1 FlashLing 3.1 Flash

The Matrix

1999

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Мастер и Маргарита

Михаил Афанасьевич Булгаков

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3.5 27BQwen3.5 27B

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

The Great Gatsby

F. Scott Fitzgerald

Paris

France

Elden Ring

Action, RPG

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 3.1 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecLing 3.1 FlashQwen3.5 27B
Input priceFree$0.3/M tokens
Output priceFree$2.4/M tokens
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedOct 2026Feb 2026
At 10M a month$0$0$3.00$3.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it7 hosts, cheapest first
Ling 3.1 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3.5 27B6 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$1.56 out·262k·99.4% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.25 in·$2.00 out·262k·96.3% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.26 in·$2.60 out·262k·99.9% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$0.27 in·$2.16 out·262k·99.1% up
  • NNovitabf16$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.9% up
  • PPhala$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·97.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI while Qwen3.5 27B is developed by Qwen. Ling 3.1 Flash has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.5 27B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Qwen3.5 27B?

It depends on your use case. Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Ling 3.1 Flash cost compared to Qwen3.5 27B?

Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.3/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $0.30/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.5 27B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 27B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 27B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 27B vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
  • Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Bert-Nebulon AlphaNew provider
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)Same size
  • Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude 2New provider

Model pages

  • Ling 3.1 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 27B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed