Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 4 Maverick, both from Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 3.1 405B is made by meta while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Llama 3.1 405B has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Llama 3.1 405B costs $2.7/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper on both — 1.8× input, 1.2× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Maverick uses 370.1x more bold
