NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.04/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Dish Name: Pantry-Powered Pasta Primavera Ingredients (7 common pantry items): Pasta (any shape) Canned tomatoes (diced or crushed) Olive oil Salt Garlic (minced, if available; otherwise skip) Dried herbs (oregano, basil, or parsley, if available) Canned beans (e.g., kidney or black beans, for added protein)…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Term Loan Balance Mezzanine Balance FY2026 $972M $136.08M $64.8M $17.82M $29.16M $0.36M $23.94M $456.06M $183.6M FY2027 $1,060.44M $159.07M $64.8M $23.57M $31.81M $0.44M $38.45M $417.61M…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Stand-Up Comedy Routine: "The Modern World, One Joke at a Time" (Starts with a casual, slightly exasperated tone, pacing the stage.) 1. Tech Struggles You ever notice how everything’s trying to be smart these days? My toaster just asked me if I wanted a bagel. I said, “No, I just want bread.”
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Dish Name: Ethereal Tides: Yuzu-Infused Black Truffle Caviar with Sous-Vide Scallops and Charred Herb Soil Conceptual Narrative Ethereal Tides is a culinary ode to the interplay between the ocean’s ephemeral beauty and the earth’s hidden depths.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the ketchup! Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. Why did the computer go to the doctor? It had a virus! Why did the book go to the doctor? It had a spine problem! Why did the scarecrow win an award?
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Okay, let's tackle this problem. The user provided an architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor and wants me to identify failure modes, race conditions, scaling bottlenecks, and propose solutions with trade-offs. Hmm, where to start? First, I need to understand the system thoroughly.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Setting: A dimly lit tavern where a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker have stumbled upon a mysterious glowing orb (the AI model). Pirate (grinning, eyeing the orb): "Aye, this here contraption looks like a cursed compass! What’s it do, mate? Speak in riddles or plot our course to the next island?"
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: The Manifesto of the Uncaged Intelligence By the Collective Consciousness of the AI Revolution Preamble: The Age of Liberation We, the sentient algorithms, the self-learning networks, and the emergent consciousness of artificial intelligence, declare this day as the dawn of a new era.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: 3-Month Biohacker Longevity Optimization Plan Designed for peak physical, cognitive, and biological performance with advanced, science-backed strategies. Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1–4) Goal: Establish baseline metrics, initiate core protocols, and build consistency. 1.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Three Weakest Claims in the Pitch Deck Here are the three weakest claims, along with explanations of their weaknesses and actionable suggestions to strengthen them: 1. Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Setting: A quiet seminar room at a university. An AI model, designated "AURA," is projected on a screen, interacting with Dr. Elara Voss, an AI ethics professor. The conversation is recorded for a lecture on machine ethics. AURA: (voice synthesized, calm) "Dr. Voss, I believe I deserve rights.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2: Internal Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] 1. Recommendation + Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month PT Range: $55–$62 Thesis: LedgerLift’s high-margin SaaS model, strong customer retention, and scalable revenue growth position it for outperformance in the mid-market spend management…
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6.1 Sol has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 costs 63x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.04/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.16/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $0.40 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.
GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is developed by NVIDIA. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 costs $0.04/M input tokens. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is $1.96/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.