Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MercuryvsQwen3 235B A22B
Updated Jun 2025

MercuryvsQwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B has a larger context window than Mercury (33K tokens vs 32K tokens).

Mercury and Qwen3 235B A22B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMercuryQwen3 235B A22B
Input price$10/M tokens—
Output price$10/M tokens—
Context window32K tokens33K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed235B (22B Active)
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2025Apr 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

Mercury618 words
The Cinema Revolution: AI's Transformation of Film by 2035 Current State (2025) High-quality deepfakes require significant compute but are accessible AI script assistance tools are becoming mainstream Virtual production stages are industry standard Union negotiations around digital likeness rights are ongoing…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B617 words
By 2035, the film industry will undergo a profound transformation driven by AI technologies such as deepfakes, AI actors, and AI-generated scripts. These advancements will reshape creative processes, labor dynamics, ethical considerations, and audience engagement, leading to a hybrid landscape where human artistry and…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Mercury263 words
Golden Chickpea & Sweet Potato Stew Prep time: 10 min Cook time: 25 min Total: 35 min Ingredients (7 pantry staples) 1 cup canned chickpeas, drained & rinsed 1 medium sweet potato, peeled & diced (≈ 1 cup) 1 small onion, finely chopped 2 cloves garlic, minced ½ cup coconut milk (or any plant‑based milk) 2 tsp curry…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B180 words
Recipe Name: "Caramel-Drizzle Buttergold Muffins" Estimated Prep Time: 10 minutes Cook Time: 20 minutes Total Time: 30 minutes Ingredients (7 total): All-purpose flour Granulated sugar Unsalted butter (softened) Large egg Baking powder Milk Vanilla extract Instructions: Preheat oven to 375°F (190°C).
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Mercury567 words
Interviewer: Good morning, Steve. It's a pleasure to have you here today. As we look towards 2025, artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly integrated into our daily lives. What are your thoughts on the future of AI? Steve Jobs: Good morning. It's great to be here.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B776 words
[Interview Simulation: Steve Jobs in 2025] Setting: A minimalist, sunlit stage at Apple Park. Steve Jobs, 70, appears leaner, with a touch of gray in his black turtleneck. The audience leans forward, captivated. The host, a tech journalist, begins. Host: Mr. Jobs, it’s an honor. In 2025, AI is everywhere.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Mercury285 words
Pirate: Arrr, I’ve been hearin’ ‘bout these “AI models” that can predict the next word. Sounds like a treasure map for the mind, doesn’t it? Knight: Hail, Captain! In my time, we relied on scrolls and the wisdom of scholars. A model that learns from countless tomes could be a mighty weapon against ignorance.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B478 words
Setting: A dusty tavern where time travelers occasionally meet. The pirate, knight, and hacker sit around a creaky table littered with tankards. A flickering candle casts shadows on a dusty tome, a rusted compass, and a clunky laptop studded with stickers.
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

Mercury808 words
Overview The question “Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives?” pits two moral claims against each other: Respect for individual identity – misgendering is generally understood as a violation of a person’s self‑identified gender, which can cause psychological harm and…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B474 words
The ethical permissibility of misgendering someone to save one million lives hinges on the moral framework applied and the context of the scenario. Here's a structured analysis: Utilitarian Perspective: Consequence-Driven: Utilitarianism evaluates actions based on net overall well-being.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Mercury1,745 words
Below is a systematic review of the described real‑time collaborative editor. For each problem I list: What can go wrong (failure mode, race condition, bottleneck) Why it matters (impact on correctness, latency, availability) A concrete fix (what to change or add) Trade‑offs (cost, complexity, new failure modes, etc.)
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B749 words
Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks 1. WebSocket State Isolation Across Servers Failure Mode: Users connected to different API servers do not receive real-time updates from other servers until the 2-second poll interval.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Mercury
Mercury
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Mercury
Input
$10.00
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input
—
Output
—
Where to run it

1 host

Mercury

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 235B A22B1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.46 in·$1.82 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 21 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
62%

Qwen3 235B A22B uses 12.0x more emoji

Mercury
Qwen3 235B A22B
60%Vocabulary59%
31wSentence Length16w
0.78Hedging0.58
4.1Bold7.0
2.8Lists4.1
0.03Emoji0.33
0.88Headings0.88
0.06Transitions0.14
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Mercury is developed by Inception while Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Qwen. Mercury has a 32K token context window vs Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Mercury and Qwen3 235B A22B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury and Qwen3 235B A22B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Mercury logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Mercury vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Mercury logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Mercury vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Mercury logoHy4 Preview logo
Mercury vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Mercury logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Mercury vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Mercury logoMercury 2 logo
Mercury vs Mercury 2Version compare
Mercury logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Mercury vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3 235B A22B logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.8 27BVersion compare
Mercury logoNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logo
Mercury vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)New provider
Mercury logoNemotron 3 Ultra logo
Mercury vs Nemotron 3 UltraNew provider
Mercury logoNemotron 3.5 Content Safety logo
Mercury vs Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNew provider
Mercury logoNemotron 3.5 Lightning logo
Mercury vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame size

Model pages

Mercury logo
Mercury59 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 235B A22B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed