MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
9.1× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.0× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 9.1× input, 5.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 5.7x more transitions
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
58%Vocabulary56%
22wSentence Length14w
0.61Hedging0.37
5.7Bold5.7
3.1Lists4.0
0.63Emoji0.54
1.40Headings0.70
0.02Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
