MiniMax M2vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MiniMax M2 is cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at $0/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.
| Spec | MiniMax M2 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
Output
$1.50
Where to run it
2 hosts
MiniMax M2
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
25%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 11.8x more emoji
MiniMax M2
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
59%Vocabulary56%
14wSentence Length16w
0.48Hedging0.32
4.1Bold5.1
3.6Lists3.9
0.08Emoji0.92
0.60Headings0.75
0.17Transitions0.08
Based on 11 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5.1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5.2New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Golden Gate ClaudeNew provider
MiniMax M2 vs GPT-2New provider