MiniMax M2.7vsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0.3/M vs $2/M input tokens.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Aug 2026 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MiniMax M2.7Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
MiniMax M2.7 costs 5.0x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.20
5.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper on both — 6.7× input, 5.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
MiniMax M2.7 uses 28.4x more emoji
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
56%Vocabulary53%
26wSentence Length18w
0.50Hedging0.83
6.8Bold3.1
3.5Lists4.3
0.28Emoji0.00
1.20Headings1.34
0.11Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiniMax M2.5Cross-provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonar Pro SearchNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonoma Dusk AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonoma Sky AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 vs TNG R1T ChimeraNew provider