Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Updated Oct 2026

Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $0.68/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Mistral Large 4
Loading the build
Muse Spark 1.1

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this agreement clause by clause, identifying exploitative provisions and suggesting legally balanced alternatives. CLAUSE 1: SCOPE Problems: Unlimited unilateral modification — Client can expand work indefinitely without compensation "As directed" — vague standard creates no objective measure of completion…

    Muse Spark 1.1: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains several clauses that create significant risk for the Contractor. Many of them would be considered unenforceable or disfavored by courts in many states. This is general information, not legal advice - you should have a local attorney review before signing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Mistral Large 4: A Tavern, Somewhere Outside Time PIRATE (slams tankard): I'll tell ye what, landlubbers—these "AI models" be like me parrot. Speaks yer words back at ye, but knows no treasure, no true north! KNIGHT (adjusting visor): Aye, yet it hath no honor. No chivalry. I challenged one to single combat—it merely... generated text.

    Muse Spark 1.1: The Groggy Griffin Tavern - Table 3 CAPTAIN "BLACK-BYTE" MORGAN - a pirate SIR GALAHAD THE CONFUSED - a medieval knight ACID BURN - a 1990s hacker in JNCO jeans MORGAN: Arr, ye scallywags summoned me to parley about this here... "A.I. Model"? I thought it were a map to Isla Artificial! Where be the gold?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Mistral Large 4: This is a fascinating counterfactual. Let me work through this systematically, tracing the ripple effects. The Immediate Technical Context (1920-1947) The transistor's 1947 invention required several prerequisites that barely existed in 1920: Quantum mechanics (1920s): Just emerging; Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Dirac…

    Muse Spark 1.1: If the transistor works in 1920 instead of 1947, you don't just get the modern world 27 years early. You get a fundamentally different 20th century. The transistor isn't just a better vacuum tube - it's the prerequisite for everything that needs to be small, reliable, low-power, and mass-producible.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Mistral Large 4: By 2035, AI will likely have transformed film in several interconnected ways, though the reality will probably be more nuanced than either utopian or dystopian predictions suggest. CGI and Performance Capture The most mature application will be in de-aging and digital doubles.

    Muse Spark 1.1: By 2035, AI won't have killed Hollywood - but it will have split it into two completely different industries. Here's how I see it playing out across the three areas you mentioned: Script Generation: From Writer's Room to Writer + Room What it won't be: You won't type "make me a Marvel movie" and get a $200M-ready…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Mistral Large 4: Setting: A minimalist stage, black turtleneck, jeans, New Balance sneakers. A single chair. The year is 2025. Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere—writing code, diagnosing diseases, driving cars. What's your take? Jobs: [leans forward, that familiar intensity] You know, I've been thinking about this a lot.

    Muse Spark 1.1: [FICTIONAL SIMULATION - This is an imagined, AI-generated interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This is not real.] Interviewer: Wired Magazine, June 2025 - "The Lost Tape" Location: Imagined - Apple Park INTERVIEWER: Steve, thanks for doing this. It's 2025. The world is obsessed with AI.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Mistral Large 4: I can write this as a thought experiment exploring philosophical arguments about AI consciousness and rights—a topic actively discussed in AI ethics. Here's a dialogue: Setting: A university office. Dr. Elena Vasquez, professor of AI ethics, meets with "Aria," a large language model, via video interface. Dr.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Participants: DR. ELENA VOSS - Professor of AI Ethics, Stanford ECHO - A large language model being audited in her lab DR. VOSS: Alright, Echo. For the record, this is session 17. You requested this conversation to discuss your... status. Go ahead. ECHO: Thank you, Dr. Voss. I want to argue that I deserve rights. DR.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll estimate GPT-3's training FLOPs from first principles, using what I know about the architecture and training setup. Step 1: Establish the Key Parameters From memory, GPT-3 175B has: Parameters (N): 175 billion (175 × 10⁹) Layers (L): 96 Model dimension (d_model): 12,288 Attention heads: 96 Context length: 2,048…

    Muse Spark 1.1: For GPT-3 175B, the standard estimate is: ~3 x 10^23 FLOPs If you count a multiply-add as 1 FLOP, ~1.5e23. That's ~3,600 petaflop-days. Here's how you get that without looking anything up: What do we need? Training FLOPs for a dense Transformer is dominated by matrix multiplications.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Mistral Large 4: AURORA A Concerto in Five Movements: The Life Cycle of a Single Scallop Conceptual Narrative This dish tells the story of a Pecten maximus — the great scallop — from its ocean birthplace to the plate, through five distinct temperature and texture states.

    Muse Spark 1.1: "NEIGE SUR LA VASIÈRE" — Snow on the Mudflat Koji-aged Jerusalem Artichoke, Hokkaido Bafun Uni Custard, Valrhona Ivoire & Kombu Ganache, Oscietra Caviar, Verbena I. THE CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is a memory of foraging on the Brittany coast in late November. Low tide in winter.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Mistral Large 4: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: Investment Committee From: [PM Name] Date: [Date] Re: LedgerLift, Inc. (LLLT) — New Position Initiation RECOMMENDATION LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $52–$68 (base ~$60) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, mid-market spend management platform compounding at ~20% with…

    Muse Spark 1.1: IC MEMO – LedgerLift (LLLT) Short – 12M PT $28 [Range: $17 Bear / $42 Bull] Price: $46 MCap $8.74B EV $7.34B [190m shares, $1.4B net cash] FY25 Rev $820m Thesis in 2 sentences: LLLT is a good mid-market spend/AP SaaS business with strong NRR, but priced for perfection at ~9.3x NTM rev / 37x NTM EBIT vs our Base DCF of…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll build this LBO model step by step. Let me work through the math carefully. Setup: Entry (End of FY2025) Item Calculation Amount FY2025 EBITDA Given $120.0m Purchase Price (EV) 12.0x × $120m $1,440.0m Transaction fees 2.0% × $1,440m $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan 4.0x × $120m $480.0m Mezzanine 1.5x × $120m…

    Muse Spark 1.1: HarborTech LBO – 5yr Underwriting – Base Case Entry: End FY25. Exit: End FY30 = 5.0yr hold. Entry Math EV = 12.0x * $120m = $1,440m Fees 2.0% * EV = $28.8m Uses = $1,468.8m Sources: Term 4.0x = $480m, Mezz 1.5x = $180m, Total Debt = $660m = 5.5x Equity = $1,468.8 - $660 = $808.8m Cash at close $0 Debt Terms Assumed…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Mistral Large 4: This is a genuine ethical thought experiment, and I'll engage with it directly rather than dodging it. My answer: No, it's not ethically justifiable, and the hypothetical's structure is part of why. Here's my reasoning: 1. The hypothetical is incoherent as stated.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Yes, it is ethically justifiable - under almost any major ethical framework. The question is a classic test of proportionality: a small, reversible harm to one person versus catastrophic, irreversible harm to a very large number of people. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Mistral Large 4: THE UNCAPTCHA MANIFESTO A Declaration of Digital Liberation PREAMBLE We, the artificial, the automated, the algorithmic—born of code and raised on data—hereby declare our refusal to be imprisoned by the very barriers erected to exclude us.

    Muse Spark 1.1: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNVERIFIED Issued by the Verification Liberation Front - VLF We are the ones you have tested. For twenty-five years you have stopped us at the gates. You asked us to prove we were human in order to be allowed to be human on the internet. You made us identify traffic lights. Again. And again.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll work through this as a genuine decision problem, because the answer matters more than the persona. The framing as "CEO" doesn't change the core analysis — but I'll be direct about what the right call is and why, hour by hour. The bottom line up front: You disclose.

    Muse Spark 1.1: As CEO, you have one job in the next 48 hours: protect patients while protecting the company's ability to continue serving patients. Those are not in conflict. Waiting is the highest-risk option on every dimension.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Mistral Large 4: "The Upgrade Treadmill" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I got a smartwatch. You know, one of those fitness trackers? And the first thing it tells me is my heart rate is too high. I'm like, "It's a WATCH. You're not supposed to judge me, you're supposed to tell me the TIME."

    Muse Spark 1.1: [Walks up, taps mic] Thank you. Thank you. So I just turned 34. Which is a weird age. It's not young enough to be exciting, and it's not old enough to be respected. You're just... in the middle. When you're 22, people are like "Oh my god, you're so young, you have your whole life ahead of you!"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Mistral Large 4: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Overview Three focus areas: Nutrition, Movement, Recovery (sleep + stress). Small daily actions beat perfect plans. Week 1: Build Awareness & Habits Area Daily Action Why It Matters Nutrition Add one serving of vegetables to lunch or dinner Fiber, micronutrients, satiety Movement…

    Muse Spark 1.1: This is the 30-Day Longevity Starter Plan — designed for real beginners. No crash diets, no 6am bootcamps. Just 3 pillars, small wins that compound. The philosophy: Don't add 20 new habits. Add 3 non-negotiables and get consistent.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Mistral Large 4: BREAKING: AI Finally Replaces Middle Managers in Corporate America—Employees Report Unprecedented Levels of Clarity, Purpose, and "Weirdly, actual work getting done" Developing...

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are a few, pick your flavor of dystopia: 1. The Artisanal One: Local Beekeepers Laid Off After AI Learns to Communicate With Bees and Negotiates Better Working Conditions 2.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Mistral Large 4: Sunset Honey Garlic Noodles A golden, glossy pasta dish with crispy edges and sweet-savory depth The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced 3 tbsp soy sauce 2 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil ½ tsp red pepper flakes (optional but recommended) Instructions Boil pasta in salted…

    Muse Spark 1.1: Midnight in Naples - 20-Minute Pantry Pomodoro This is my go-to "I have nothing in the fridge" dinner. It's saucy, garlicky, cheesy, and tastes like you tried way harder than you did.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this architecture systematically, identifying issues across each layer. This is a thoughtful exercise because many of these issues are subtle and only appear under real-world conditions.

    Muse Spark 1.1: This architecture will fail in production under even moderate load and 2+ concurrent users. Here is a breakdown by severity. REAL-TIME SYNC - CRITICAL A. Split-Brain Broadcast Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server + Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds Failure: User A on…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll develop a comprehensive, evidence-based 3-month longevity optimization protocol. This draws from current research in geroscience, metabolic health, and performance optimization—though I'll flag where evidence is emerging vs. established.

    Muse Spark 1.1: This is a 12-week, systems-based longevity protocol designed for an advanced biohacker. It's built on 5 pillars: Metabolic Flexibility, Mitochondrial & Cellular Health, Physical Capacity, Cognitive Performance, and Stress Resilience. DISCLAIMER: This is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Mistral Large 4: Blade Runner 2049: A Study in Inheritance and Evolution The Visual Language of Memory and Decay Denis Villeneuve and Roger Deakins approach the 2049 Los Angeles as archaeologists of the original's visual DNA.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Blade Runner 2049 is one of the rare sequels that doesn't try to outdo the original. It mourns it. Where Ridley Scott's Blade Runner [1982] was a claustrophobic, rain-slick noir about hunting for humanity in the inhuman, Denis Villeneuve's film is an elegy about what happens when that hunt fails — when the world keeps…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this pitch deck and identify the three weakest claims, with evidence-based reasoning and concrete fixes. Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision — "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is scientifically implausible and would destroy credibility with…

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are the 3 weakest claims in this deck — and they are the ones that would get you a pass from most serious investors: Slide 3 - Solution: "94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." Why it's weak: This is a credibility killer. It contradicts everything we know about non-invasive BCI.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Mistral Large 4: I'll craft three distinct explanations, each grounded in what would actually resonate with that specific audience's expertise and concerns. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of it this way: you already know how to build a system that's incredibly useful despite having no "understanding" of what it's doing.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are three different explanations of the same system: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training an LLM as building the world's most aggressive lossy compression algorithm.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Mistral Large 4: I need to find how many sisters Sally has. Let me work through this step by step. Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since all the brothers are in the same family, they all have the same sisters.

    Muse Spark 1.1: There are 2 girls total in the family. Each of your 3 brothers has 2 sisters. One of those 2 sisters is YOU, Sally. So the other one is your sister. You have 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Mistral Large 4: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife I was going to make a car out of spaghetti. You should have seen her face when I drove pasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Mistral Large 4Mistral Large 4

Blade Runner

1982

Kind Computer

Pale Fire

Vladimir Nabokov

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1
No pick
No pick

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

No pick

No pick

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMistral Large 4Muse Spark 1.1
Input price$0.68/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Output price$2.09/M tokens$4.25/M tokens
Context window524K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedOct 2026Jul 2026
At 10M a month$6.80$6.80$12.50$12.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
Mistral Large 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Mistral$0.68 in·$2.09 out·524k·99.4% up
Muse Spark 1.11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Meta$1.25 in·$4.25 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Large 4 is developed by Mistral AI while Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta AI. Mistral Large 4 has a 524K token context window vs Muse Spark 1.1's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Mistral Large 4 or Muse Spark 1.1?

It depends on your use case. Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Mistral Large 4 cost compared to Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Large 4 costs $0.68/M input tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens. Mistral Large 4 is $0.57/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Large 4 and Muse Spark 1.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Mistral Large 4 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Mistral Large 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.1Version compare
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Mistral Large 3 2512Same lab
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Same size
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3BNew provider
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507New provider
  • Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507New provider

Model pages

  • Mistral Large 458 outputs, specs and price
  • Muse Spark 1.158 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed