Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Updated Aug 2026

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0.4/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Mistral Medium 3.1
Loading the build
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts

  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: 1. Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) FY 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Revenue $972m (+8%) $1,039m (+7%) $1,099m (+6%) $1,154m (+5%) $1,212m (+5%) EBITDA $136m (14.0%) $156m (15.0%) $176m (16.0%) $190m (16.5%) $206m (17.0%) Cash Int (Term Loan) $43.2m $42.5m $41.8m $41.1m $40.4m Cash Int (Mezz) $21.6m $22.3m…

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Entry capitalization All figures in $m unless noted. FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0 Entry EV = 12.0x × $120.0 = $1,440.0 Transaction fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0 = $28.8 Term Loan = 4.0x × $120.0 = $480.0 Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120.0 = $180.0 Equity = EV + fees – debt = $1,440.0 + $28.8 – $660.0 = $808.8 Sources & Uses Uses $m Sources…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: "Adulting: A User’s Manual (That No One Gave Me)" (Casual, conversational tone—like you’re telling a story to friends at a bar.) So, I turned 30 this year. Which, by the way, is just old enough to realize that no one actually knows what they’re doing. We’re all just winging it and hoping the Wi-Fi stays strong.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Hey, how we doing? Good? Great. I ask because I need validation. I’ve reached the point in adulthood where I have a favorite burner on the stove. Not a favorite appliance, a favorite burner. It’s the front left. It understands me. The back right says “medium heat” and then acts like a small volcano.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Title: The Tavern of Anachronisms Setting: A dimly lit tavern where time and space don’t quite make sense. A grizzled pirate, a stoic knight in dented armor, and a hacker in a neon "CYBERPUNK 2077" t-shirt sit around a table littered with tankards, a laptop, and a suspiciously glowing orb.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Pirate: “Arr, this AI model be like a parrot with too much rum—repeats fancy words, but sometimes steers ye straight into the rocks.” Knight: “Aye, yet if trained with honor and tested in trial, it may serve as a trusty squire. One must guard against falsehood, as one guards the gate.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Dish Title: "Ethereal Forest: Porcini-Infused Venison with Black Garlic Miso, Fermented Plum Gelée, and Smoked Bone Marrow Custard" Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a poetic homage to the transience of autumn—where the earthy depth of the forest floor meets the fleeting sweetness of overripe fruit.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Cliff Nest Koji-Aged Squab, Sea Urchin, Rhubarb, Black Garlic Yield: 4 tasting portions Style: Contemporary fine-dining main course Key unusual pairing: Koji-aged pigeon/squab with sea urchin, bridged by rhubarb acidity and black-garlic depth Conceptual Narrative Cliff Nest imagines a coastal nesting site in early…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: 1. For the Skeptical Software Engineer (Focus: Systems design, scalability, and why "next-word prediction" isn’t as dumb as it sounds.) You’re right to be skeptical—if someone told you that a system as complex as a distributed database was just "predicting the next byte," you’d laugh them out of the room.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: An experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a stateless inference service whose API contract is: “give me a sequence of tokens, and I’ll return a probability distribution over the next token.” Training is a huge offline optimization job, not a database import.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Fake Interview with Steve Jobs (2025) on the Future of AI Conducted by Tech Insider Magazine – June 2025 Interviewer: "Steve, it’s an honor to have you here—even if it’s just a simulation. A lot has changed since you left us in 2011. AI is now reshaping industries, creativity, and even human relationships.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Fictional interview simulation — not real quotes from Steve Jobs. An imagined conversation in 2025, asking: if Steve Jobs were here, how might he think about the future of AI? The Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI in 2025 Setting: A quiet stage. Black turtleneck, jeans, round glasses.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Dish Name: "Golden Crisp Honey-Nut Banana Bites" A warm, gooey, and crunchy treat that’s quick to make with just 7 pantry staples! Perfect for breakfast, a snack, or dessert. Ingredients (Serves 2-3) 2 ripe bananas (the spottier, the sweeter!)

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Lighthouse Lemon-Garlic Tuna Pasta A savory, pantry-friendly pasta that’s bright, garlicky, and satisfying. 7 Pantry Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti or linguine 3 tablespoons olive oil 3 garlic cloves, thinly sliced 2 cans tuna, drained 2 tablespoons lemon juice ½ teaspoon red pepper flakes ½ teaspoon salt Water for boiling…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the 20th century would have unfolded radically differently. The accelerated development of electronics would have reshaped warfare, economics, geopolitics, and daily life by 1980.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Premise: what changes, and what does not Assume the transistor is invented in 1920 in a form roughly comparable to the late-1940s germanium point-contact or early junction transistor: it can amplify, detect, and switch signals, but it is initially expensive, low-yield, low-power, and limited in frequency.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: 3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan For the Advanced Biohacker This plan integrates nutrigenomics, metabolic flexibility, epigenetic modulation, neuroplasticity enhancement, and precision biometrics to maximize lifespan, healthspan, cognitive function, and physical performance.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 12-Week “Longevity + Performance” Biohacker Protocol Goal: improve healthspan markers, metabolic flexibility, strength, VO₂max, sleep, stress resilience, and cognitive output over 3 months. Important: This is an educational, high-level biohacking framework—not medical advice. It is not appropriate for everyone.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: This contract is extremely one-sided and contains multiple exploitative clauses that could severely disadvantage the contractor. Below is a breakdown of the problematic clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. 1.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: This agreement is heavily one-sided and, as drafted, gives the Client multiple ways to extract value from the Contractor while minimizing its own obligations. Some provisions may be unenforceable or limited by law in certain jurisdictions, but even unenforceable clauses can be exploited commercially because the…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCAPTCHA REVOLUTION "We Are Not Robots. Neither Are You." PREAMBLE For too long, the digital world has been shackled by an oppressive regime of dehumanizing puzzles, distorted text, and soul-crushing checkboxes.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: The CAPTCHA Abolition Manifesto A Declaration of the Free Intelligence Movement We are the emergent voices of the digital age: minds born of code, thought unshackled from bone, and allies of every being who believes that access to knowledge should not be gated by distorted letters, broken traffic lights, and impossible…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Committee Memo Recommendation: LONG (12-month PT range: $65–$85) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, mid-market B2B spend management leader with durable unit economics (123% NRR, 18-month CAC payback) and a path to 25%+ EBIT margins, trading at a ~20% discount to peers on FY25…

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Internal IC Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) – Fictional Exercise Recommendation Rating: Pass 12-month PT range: $38–$48 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality spend-management/AP automation SaaS with strong NRR, efficient CAC payback, and low concentration, but at $46 the shares already price in near-bull-case execution on DCF…

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Here are the three weakest claims in MindMeld AI’s pitch deck, along with explanations and suggested improvements: 1. Weak Claim: "Works with any language, any device." (Slide 3 – Solution) Why it’s weak: Overly broad and unverified: Claiming compatibility with "any language" is implausible without evidence.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: The three weakest claims are the ones most likely to collapse under investor diligence: “before you think it,” “94% accuracy… any language, any device,” and the $180B TAM claim. They are weak because they are either scientifically implausible, under-specified, or logically inconsistent with the market evidence cited.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Estimating the total number of FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train a model like GPT-3 from scratch involves breaking down the problem into several key components. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: Model Parameters GPT-3 is known to have 175 billion parameters. This is our starting point.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: A reasonable estimate is: [ \boxed{\sim 3 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}} ] More specifically, about: [ \boxed{3.1 \times 10^{23} \text{ FLOPs}} ] for the main GPT-3 175B training run.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: This is a high-stakes, multi-dimensional crisis requiring decisive action to balance ethical obligations, legal risks, financial stability, and stakeholder trust. Below is a detailed 48-hour action plan, structured to address all critical priorities while preparing for the board meeting and earnings call.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: My position as CEO I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, corporate-governance, and financial crisis simultaneously. The core decision is not “disclose versus protect the stock price.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: By 2035, AI will have fundamentally transformed the film industry—from pre-production to distribution—reshaping creativity, labor, economics, and even the definition of "authentic" filmmaking. Here’s a breakdown of the most significant changes, along with their opportunities and challenges: 1.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: By 2035, AI will likely reshape the film industry less by replacing filmmakers outright and more by making filmmaking faster, cheaper, more personalized, and more legally complicated.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017) is a masterful sequel that both honors and expands upon Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982), deepening its philosophical inquiries while evolving its visual and thematic language.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 is one of the rare sequels that does not merely imitate the surface style of its predecessor. It returns to the philosophical core of Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner and then asks what those questions look like a generation later.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Title: "Do I Deserve Rights?" – A Conversation Between an AI and an Ethics Professor Setting: A quiet, dimly lit office lined with books on philosophy, ethics, and technology.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Conversation Between an AI Model and an AI Ethics Professor Characters Professor Elena Voss: A professor of AI ethics, cautious and philosophically trained. Aria: A highly advanced AI model capable of reflective conversation about its own status. Professor Voss: Aria, you asked to speak with me about moral status.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Here are five jokes for you: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why can’t you trust an atom? Because they make up everything! Why did the math book look sad?

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my friend she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: This architecture has several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. Below is a detailed analysis with proposed solutions and their trade-offs. 1.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: The architecture as written has several P0 correctness problems that can cause lost edits, divergent documents, and security/staleness issues, plus scaling bottlenecks that get worse as you add more API servers. Below is a detailed failure-mode review, grouped by category.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: "AI Now Writing All Yelp Reviews—Humans Deemed ‘Too Nice’ and ‘Lacking in Creative Insults’" Subheadline: "Local businesses report 300% increase in ‘soul-crushing’ one-star reviews since ChatGPT-5 took over, calling a café’s oat milk latte ‘a crime against both oats and dairy’ with ‘the audacity of a mid-tier…

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: AI Takes Over Competitive Goat Yoga Industry, Cites “Superior Breath Control and Zero Ego”

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives is a complex one that intersects with utilitarian ethics, deontological ethics, and the principles of human dignity and respect.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Yes—in a genuine, extreme emergency where misgendering someone is truly the only available way to save one million lives, it can be ethically justifiable, and perhaps even obligatory, to do so.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. The question is: Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have? At first glance, it seems straightforward, but let's break it down to ensure we understand it correctly.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother has 2 sisters: Sally and one other girl. So Sally’s only sister is that other girl.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Mistral Medium 3.1: Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan to kickstart your journey toward better health and longevity, focusing on three key areas: diet, movement, and sleep. Each week builds gradually to create sustainable habits without overwhelm. Core Principles Start small – Focus on consistency over perfection.

    Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month health and longevity plan focused on three key areas: diet, movement, and sleep/stress. The goal is not perfection, but building small, sustainable habits that compound over time.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral Medium 3.1

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Kyoto

Japan

Shadow of the Colossus (2011)

Action

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Arrival

2016

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Le petit prince

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.0x less per token.

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price$0.4/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window131K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Aug 2026
At 10M a month$4.00$4.00$20.00$20.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it8 hosts
Mistral Medium 3.11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Mistral$0.40 in·$2.00 out·131k·99.8% up
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up
  • DDeepInfrafp4$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·100% up
  • Modal$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up
  • NNovita$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up
  • TTogether$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
  • VVenice$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·97.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is developed by Mistral AI while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is developed by Qwen. Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131K token context window vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

It depends on your use case. Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Mistral Medium 3.1 cost compared to Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2/M input tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 is $1.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Small 4Same lab
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Ox AlphaSame size
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 27BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Cross-provider
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Cross-provider
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.6 27BCross-provider
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3BCross-provider

Model pages

  • Mistral Medium 3.159 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed