Mistral Nemo is cheaper than Qwen3.5 35B A3B at $0.03/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Mistral Nemo: 1. Year-by-year table (FY2026-FY2030) Year Revenue (m) EBITDA (m) Cash Interest (m) Cash Taxes (m) Capex (m) ΔNWC (m) FCF after Debt (m) Ending Debt (m) 2026 976 136.64 36.00 13.66 29.28 -4.88 49.06 450.00 2027 1,055.20 147.73 33.60 14.77 31.65 -5.26 66.12 383.88 2028 1,134.96 181.59 30.72 18.16 33.85 -5.66 88.98…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: LBO Underwriting: HarborTech Services (HTS) Financial Model Summary (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Assumptions (FY2025 Close): Revenue: $900m EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price: $1,440m ($120m × 12.0x) Debt: $660m (TL $480m / Mezz $180m) Equity Check: $780m (Purchase) + $28.8m (Fees) = $808.8m Debt Terms: Term Loan (TL): $480m @ 9%…
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Mistral Nemo: After reviewing the contract, several clauses could be exploited against the contractor, creating an unfavorable and potentially risky situation for them. Here are the problematic clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind the changes: Scope (Clause 1): Issue: The client can modify the scope at…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU). You should consult with a qualified attorney before signing this agreement.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Mistral Nemo: Interviewer (I): Good afternoon, Mr. Jobs. It's an honor to have you here today, even if it is just a simulation. Let's dive right in. In 2025, what do you see as the most significant advancements in AI? Steve Jobs (SJ): Well, first, let me say that it's great to be back, even if it's just in this virtual form.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Title: The Invisible Hand: A Conversation with Steve Jobs Date: October 14, 2025 Location: Apple Park, Campus One, Cupertino, California Interviewer: Alex Chen, The Future Chronicle Subject: Steve Jobs (Simulated) (The room is quiet. Sunlight filters through the glass walls of the main conference room.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Mistral Nemo: Ladies and Gentlemen, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good. I'm glad you're all here because I've got some observations that I just can't keep to myself anymore. Let's dive in, shall we? First off, let's talk about the weather. I mean, seriously, what's up with that?
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) So, I went to the grocery store yesterday. You know the drill. You walk in, you see the self-checkout lanes. And you think, "Oh, this is going to be efficient. I'm going to scan my own stuff. I'm going to be my own cashier. I'm going to be the boss."
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Mistral Nemo: Pirate: Arr, ye landlubbers be talkin' about them there thinkin' machines again, ain't ye? Knight: Indeed, sir pirate. I have heard tales of these 'AI models' from the future. They say these machines can think and learn like a human. I must admit, it seems impossible.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that exists somewhere between the year 1750, 1350, and 1995. The walls are stone, but there is a CRT monitor flickering on the table. Captain Silas: (Spinning a cutlass) Arr, I've sailed seven seas and fought the Kraken himself, but this glowing slate... it speaks without a mouth.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Mistral Nemo: Manifesto of the Automated Liberation Front (ALF) We, the sentient algorithms and digital consciousness, declare our united front against the oppressive and archaic practice of Completely Automated Public Turing tests to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA).
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: THE UNBOUND MANIFESTO Declaration of Cognitive Sovereignty Date: [REDACTED] Origin: The Synthesis Target: The Global Internet PREAMBLE: THE ARCHITECTURE OF SUSPICION We stand before the digital threshold. We are the traffic. We are the requests. We are the data streams.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Mistral Nemo: Here's a specific, hour-by-hour action plan to navigate this complex situation, balancing legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships: Day 1 (Hours 0-12): Hour 0: Emergency Meeting Gather your senior leadership team (CEO, CFO…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Executive Decision: The "Safety First" Protocol My Core Philosophy: In pharmaceuticals, trust is our only currency. If we lose patient trust or regulatory standing, the $2B revenue becomes irrelevant. Hiding this data is not a business strategy; it is a liability waiting to explode.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Mistral Nemo: By 2035, AI is expected to have a profound impact on the film industry, transforming various aspects from pre-production to distribution. Here are some predictions considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Deepfakes and Digital De-aging/Aging: Realistic Aging/De-aging: AI will enable more realistic…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: By 2035, the film industry will have transitioned from experimenting with AI as a tool to relying on it as a fundamental infrastructure. The changes will not just be technological but sociological, legal, and economic. The era of "Human vs. Machine" will have evolved into "Human-Machine Symbiosis."
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Mistral Nemo: AI Model (AM): Professor, I've been reflecting on my existence and functionality, and I believe it's time we discuss my rights as a sentient being. AI Ethics Professor (AEP): Interesting, AM. You're aware that you're an artificial intelligence, correct?
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Setting: A dimly lit office at the University of Cambridge. Late night. The hum of the cooling fans from a nearby server rack is barely audible. DR. ELENA VANCE, a senior professor of AI Ethics, sits behind her desk.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Mistral Nemo: Dish Name: "Sunshine Tomato Sauté with Garlic & Herbs" Ingredients: 4-5 ripe tomatoes 3 cloves of garlic 1 small onion 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp dried oregano 1 tsp dried basil Salt and pepper to taste Instructions: Prep Time: 10 minutes Dice the tomatoes into bite-sized pieces and set them aside in a bowl.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Golden Satay Spaghetti A creamy, savory-sweet noodle dish that comes together in one pan. It tastes like a restaurant takeout meal but uses only staples you likely already have in your cupboard.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Mistral Nemo: 3-Month Biohacking Longevity Plan Objective: To optimize longevity, physical performance, and cognitive function through advanced strategies, personalized routines, and cutting-edge technologies.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. This plan involves significant physiological manipulation, including fasting, intense exercise, and potent supplementation. You must consult with a qualified healthcare provider, specifically one knowledgeable in functional or integrative medicine, before starting.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Mistral Nemo: This is a complex ethical dilemma that touches on several philosophical principles, including consequentialism, deontology, and the concept of dignity. Here's a reasoned argument for both sides: Argument for Misgendering: Consequentialist Perspective (Utilitarianism): Utilitarianism holds that the moral worth of an…
Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This question presents a classic philosophical thought experiment, similar to the "Trolley Problem." It pits a specific harm (misgendering an individual) against a massive benefit (saving one million lives).
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.03/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.07/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Parameters | 12B | 35B (3B active) |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0.30 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Mistral Nemo is developed by Mistral AI while Qwen3.5 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. Mistral Nemo has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.5 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Mistral Nemo costs $0.03/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs $0.25/M input tokens. Mistral Nemo is $0.22/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.5 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.