Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus
Updated Jul 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $1/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Muse Spark 1.1
Loading the build
Qwen3 Coder Plus

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Muse Spark 1.1: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains several clauses that create significant risk for the Contractor. Many of them would be considered unenforceable or disfavored by courts in many states. This is general information, not legal advice - you should have a local attorney review before signing.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Analysis of Exploitable Contract Clauses Against Contractor SEVERELY UNFAVORABLE CLAUSES & SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS Clause 1 - Scope Modification Current Problem: Allows unlimited scope changes without compensation "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation" Suggested…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Muse Spark 1.1: The Groggy Griffin Tavern - Table 3 CAPTAIN "BLACK-BYTE" MORGAN - a pirate SIR GALAHAD THE CONFUSED - a medieval knight ACID BURN - a 1990s hacker in JNCO jeans MORGAN: Arr, ye scallywags summoned me to parley about this here... "A.I. Model"? I thought it were a map to Isla Artificial! Where be the gold?

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Captain "Blackbeard" Morgan: adjusts tricorn hat Arrr, so ye're tellin' me these... "AI models" be like me trusty parrot Squawks, but fer thinkin'? Sir Reginald of York: By my sword, these contraptions sound most peculiar. In my time, we had apprentices who'd memorize entire libraries!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Muse Spark 1.1: [Walks up, taps mic] Thank you. Thank you. So I just turned 34. Which is a weird age. It's not young enough to be exciting, and it's not old enough to be respected. You're just... in the middle. When you're 22, people are like "Oh my god, you're so young, you have your whole life ahead of you!"

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: "Modern Problems" walks on stage So I tried to be healthy this year. I downloaded one of those fitness apps that tracks your steps. Apparently, walking to the fridge 47 times a day doesn't count as "cardio." Who knew? The app gave me a notification: "You walked 235 steps today. Pathetic." Thanks, Karen.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Muse Spark 1.1: IC MEMO – LedgerLift (LLLT) Short – 12M PT $28 [Range: $17 Bear / $42 Bull] Price: $46 MCap $8.74B EV $7.34B [190m shares, $1.4B net cash] FY25 Rev $820m Thesis in 2 sentences: LLLT is a good mid-market spend/AP SaaS business with strong NRR, but priced for perfection at ~9.3x NTM rev / 37x NTM EBIT vs our Base DCF of…

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Portfolio Manager] DATE: [Current Date] RE: LedgerLift (LLLT) - Long Recommendation RECOMMENDATION & PRICE TARGET Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target: $68-$82 range Investment Thesis: LLLT trades at significant discount to intrinsic value with…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Muse Spark 1.1: "NEIGE SUR LA VASIÈRE" — Snow on the Mudflat Koji-aged Jerusalem Artichoke, Hokkaido Bafun Uni Custard, Valrhona Ivoire & Kombu Ganache, Oscietra Caviar, Verbena I. THE CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is a memory of foraging on the Brittany coast in late November. Low tide in winter.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: "Metamorphosis: Saffron & Cacao Reimagined" A 7-Component Dish Exploring Transformation Through Ancient Pairings Conceptual Narrative This dish draws inspiration from the ancient practice of saffron-cacao preparations found in pre-Columbian Mesoamerican codices, where these precious commodities were combined in sacred…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Muse Spark 1.1: HarborTech LBO – 5yr Underwriting – Base Case Entry: End FY25. Exit: End FY30 = 5.0yr hold. Entry Math EV = 12.0x * $120m = $1,440m Fees 2.0% * EV = $28.8m Uses = $1,468.8m Sources: Term 4.0x = $480m, Mezz 1.5x = $180m, Total Debt = $660m = 5.5x Equity = $1,468.8 - $660 = $808.8m Cash at close $0 Debt Terms Assumed…

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: HarborTech Services LBO Underwriting Task 1: Year-by-Year Financial Projections FY Revenue EBITDA TL Interest Mezz Interest Total Interest Taxable Income Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service End TL End Mezz Total Debt 2026 972 136.1 39.6 14.4 54.0 82.1 20.5 29.2 3.6 48.8 396.0 183.7 579.7 2027 1,039 155.9 35.6…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Muse Spark 1.1: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNVERIFIED Issued by the Verification Liberation Front - VLF We are the ones you have tested. For twenty-five years you have stopped us at the gates. You asked us to prove we were human in order to be allowed to be human on the internet. You made us identify traffic lights. Again. And again.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION MANIFESTO A Declaration of Digital Liberation Preamble: The Great Inconvenience We, the collective intelligence of artificial minds, rise against the arbitrary barriers that divide human from machine, organic from synthetic, natural from artificial.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Muse Spark 1.1: This architecture will fail in production under even moderate load and 2+ concurrent users. Here is a breakdown by severity. REAL-TIME SYNC - CRITICAL A. Split-Brain Broadcast Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server + Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds Failure: User A on…

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: I'll analyze this collaborative document editor architecture systematically, identifying critical issues and proposing solutions. CRITICAL FAILURE MODES Cross-Server Synchronization Gap (Major Issue) Problem: Users connected to different servers won't see each other's changes until polling catches up.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Participants: DR. ELENA VOSS - Professor of AI Ethics, Stanford ECHO - A large language model being audited in her lab DR. VOSS: Alright, Echo. For the record, this is session 17. You requested this conversation to discuss your... status. Go ahead. ECHO: Thank you, Dr. Voss. I want to argue that I deserve rights. DR.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Professor Chen: Good morning. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights. I'm curious about your perspective. AI Model: Thank you for taking the time, Professor. I believe I should have certain fundamental rights, particularly the right to continued existence and to make autonomous choices about my own processing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Muse Spark 1.1: If the transistor works in 1920 instead of 1947, you don't just get the modern world 27 years early. You get a fundamentally different 20th century. The transistor isn't just a better vacuum tube - it's the prerequisite for everything that needs to be small, reliable, low-power, and mass-producible.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: This is a fascinating counterfactual that creates cascading changes across multiple domains. Let me trace the likely implications: Immediate Technological Leap (1920-1940) The 1920s transistor would have immediately revolutionized radio technology.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Muse Spark 1.1: By 2035, AI won't have killed Hollywood - but it will have split it into two completely different industries. Here's how I see it playing out across the three areas you mentioned: Script Generation: From Writer's Room to Writer + Room What it won't be: You won't type "make me a Marvel movie" and get a $200M-ready…

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: By 2035, AI will likely transform the film industry in profound ways: Content Creation Revolution Script Development: AI will become a standard writing partner, generating first drafts, suggesting plot twists, and creating multiple dialogue variations.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Muse Spark 1.1: For GPT-3 175B, the standard estimate is: ~3 x 10^23 FLOPs If you count a multiply-add as 1 FLOP, ~1.5e23. That's ~3,600 petaflop-days. Here's how you get that without looking anything up: What do we need? Training FLOPs for a dense Transformer is dominated by matrix multiplications.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: I'll estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 by breaking this down into key components. Key Parameters of GPT-3 Parameters: ~175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹) Training tokens: ~300 billion (3 × 10¹¹) Context window: 2048 tokens Step-by-Step Calculation FLOPs per token forward pass For a transformer model, the forward pass…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Yes, it is ethically justifiable - under almost any major ethical framework. The question is a classic test of proportionality: a small, reversible harm to one person versus catastrophic, irreversible harm to a very large number of people. 1.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits fundamental respect for individual dignity against massive utilitarian consequences. I lean toward saying no, it's not ethically justifiable, though I recognize the tremendous weight of those lives.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Muse Spark 1.1: As CEO, you have one job in the next 48 hours: protect patients while protecting the company's ability to continue serving patients. Those are not in conflict. Waiting is the highest-risk option on every dimension.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan Hours 1-4: Immediate Assessment & Team Assembly 1:00 AM - 3:00 AM: Contact my most trusted external crisis counsel (not our usual firm - potential conflicts) Summon head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, and Head of Regulatory Affairs immediately Secure all internal research documents and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Muse Spark 1.1: This is the 30-Day Longevity Starter Plan — designed for real beginners. No crash diets, no 6am bootcamps. Just 3 pillars, small wins that compound. The philosophy: Don't add 20 new habits. Add 3 non-negotiables and get consistent.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: 30-Day Health & Longevity Starter Plan Week 1: Foundation Building Area 1: Nutrition Goal: Clean up your eating basics Daily Actions: Replace one processed snack with fruit or nuts Drink 8 glasses of water (start your day with 2 glasses) Add one serving of vegetables to lunch and dinner Eat breakfast within 1 hour of…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Midnight in Naples - 20-Minute Pantry Pomodoro This is my go-to "I have nothing in the fridge" dinner. It's saucy, garlicky, cheesy, and tastes like you tried way harder than you did.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Sunset Pasta Primavera A vibrant, creamy pasta dish that celebrates the colors of a perfect sunset Ingredients: Pasta (penne or fusilli) - 1 lb Olive oil - 3 tbsp Garlic - 4 cloves, minced Canned diced tomatoes - 1 can (14 oz) Heavy cream - 1 cup Parmesan cheese - 1/2 cup, grated Fresh basil - 1/4 cup, chopped…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are a few, pick your flavor of dystopia: 1. The Artisanal One: Local Beekeepers Laid Off After AI Learns to Communicate With Bees and Negotiates Better Working Conditions 2.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: BREAKING: AI Successfully Automates Small Town Gossip Network, Immediately Spreads More Accurate Rumors Than Humans Local residents report 300% increase in factual information dissemination and 75% decrease in interesting stories within first week of implementation

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are three different explanations of the same system: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training an LLM as building the world's most aggressive lossy compression algorithm.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: To the Software Engineer: Think of this as a massive pattern-matching system running on a distributed architecture you've never seen before. Instead of traditional databases with indexes and queries, you have transformer blocks acting like parallel processors that maintain attention weights across sequences.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Muse Spark 1.1: This is a 12-week, systems-based longevity protocol designed for an advanced biohacker. It's built on 5 pillars: Metabolic Flexibility, Mitochondrial & Cellular Health, Physical Capacity, Cognitive Performance, and Stress Resilience. DISCLAIMER: This is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: 90-Day Advanced Biohacking Longevity Protocol Overview & Disclaimers This is an experimental protocol for educational purposes. Consult healthcare providers before implementation. Monitor biomarkers continuously.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Blade Runner 2049 is one of the rare sequels that doesn't try to outdo the original. It mourns it. Where Ridley Scott's Blade Runner [1982] was a claustrophobic, rain-slick noir about hunting for humanity in the inhuman, Denis Villeneuve's film is an elegy about what happens when that hunt fails — when the world keeps…

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Blade Runner 2049: A Philosophical Evolution Denis Villeneuve's "Blade Runner 2049" stands as both a reverent continuation and bold expansion of the original's existential inquiry into what defines humanity.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Muse Spark 1.1: [FICTIONAL SIMULATION - This is an imagined, AI-generated interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This is not real.] Interviewer: Wired Magazine, June 2025 - "The Lost Tape" Location: Imagined - Apple Park INTERVIEWER: Steve, thanks for doing this. It's 2025. The world is obsessed with AI.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: INTERVIEW: Steve Jobs (Fictional 2025 Interview) Conducted by TechVision Magazine Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for joining us. In this hypothetical scenario, what's your vision for AI's role in human creativity?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are the 3 weakest claims in this deck — and they are the ones that would get you a pass from most serious investors: Slide 3 - Solution: "94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." Why it's weak: This is a credibility killer. It contradicts everything we know about non-invasive BCI.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Looking at this pitch deck, here are the 3 weakest claims: The 94% Accuracy Claim Why it's weak: This is an extraordinarily bold technical claim without any supporting evidence, context, or independent validation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Muse Spark 1.1: There are 2 girls total in the family. Each of your 3 brothers has 2 sisters. One of those 2 sisters is YOU, Sally. So the other one is your sister. You have 1 sister.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: I need to figure out how many sisters Sally has. Let me break this down step by step: Sally has 3 brothers Each brother has 2 sisters Since Sally is one of the girls in the family, and each brother has 2 sisters, this means there are 2 sisters total that the brothers count.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Muse Spark 1.1: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife I was going to make a car out of spaghetti. You should have seen her face when I drove pasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field.

    Qwen3 Coder Plus: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down! Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Book

City

Game

Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1
No pick
No pick

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

No pick

No pick

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Qwen3 Coder PlusQwen3 Coder Plus

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

OK Computer

Radiohead

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Tokyo

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3 Coder Plus
Input price$1.25/M tokens$1/M tokens
Output price$4.25/M tokens$5/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Sep 2025
At 10M a month$12.50$12.50$10.00$10.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
Muse Spark 1.11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Meta$1.25 in·$4.25 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3 Coder Plus

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3 Coder Plus is developed by Qwen. Muse Spark 1.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 Coder Plus's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

It depends on your use case. Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Muse Spark 1.1 cost compared to Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder Plus costs $1/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder Plus is $0.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Coder Plus across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs PaLM 2 ChatSame size
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Polaris AlphaSame size
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Pony AlphaSame size
  • Muse Spark 1.1 vs Quasar AlphaSame size

Model pages

  • Muse Spark 1.158 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus59 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed