Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta AI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
8.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
2.8× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 8.3× input, 2.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct uses 58.9x more emoji
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
61%Vocabulary52%
20wSentence Length16w
0.10Hedging0.20
3.7Bold5.8
2.0Lists3.7
0.01Emoji0.59
0.52Headings0.96
0.02Transitions0.05
Based on 29 + 20 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
