Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorvsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Updated Sep 2026

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorvsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at $0.1/M vs $0.11/M input tokens.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price$0.1/M tokens$0.11/M tokens
Output price$0.2/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens131K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2025
Our Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input
$0.10
1.1× cheaper
Output
$0.20
3.0× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
Output
$0.60

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper on both: 1.1× input, 3.0× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Meta$0.10 in·$0.20 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.23 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$3.00 out·131k·96.6% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.50 out·128k·94.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
48%

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 98.9x more emoji

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
58%Vocabulary56%
13wSentence Length15w
0.27Hedging0.42
2.8Bold6.1
2.3Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.99
0.44Headings0.70
0.02Transitions0.13
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Opus 4.5 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.6New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed