Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)vsQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Updated Apr 2026

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)vsQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) is cheaper than Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) at $0/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) compared across 15 shared prompts
SpecNemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input priceFree$0.4/M tokens
Output priceFree$4/M tokens
Context window256K tokens1.0M tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 15 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)400 words
You're already winning—that afternoon fatigue drop is a huge win (and proof your water habit is working!). Let’s address your questions exactly as they’re asked, with no fluff: ✅ Your Water Habit: Keep Going (Don’t Wait for "Automatic") Don’t delay Step 2 (stretching). → Why? "Automatic" is a myth.
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)854 words
Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for absolute beginners. It focuses on diet, movement (exercise), and sleep—the 3 most impactful, science-backed pillars for health and longevity. Each week builds gently on the last, prioritizing tiny, sustainable habits over drastic changes.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)326 words
Dish Name: Sunset Tomato‑Garlic Pasta Estimated Time: Prep 10 min   Cook 20 min   Total ≈ 30 min 7 Pantry Ingredients # Ingredient Quantity (serves 2) 1 Spaghetti (or any dried pasta) 200 g (≈ 7 oz) 2 Canned crushed tomatoes 1 cup (≈ 240 ml) 3 Garlic cloves 2 large, minced 4 Onion ½ medium, finely diced 5 Olive oil…
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)282 words
Crispy Chickpea Pantry Pasta Sweet or savory? Savory with a zesty kick! Total time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Why it works: Uses pantry staples to create a crunchy, garlicky, umami-packed meal with zero fresh produce needed. The chickpeas get incredibly crispy, and lemon juice (bottled) adds bright freshness.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)130 words
We need to list potential failure modes, race conditions, scaling bottlenecks, and propose specific solutions with trade-offs. Must be thorough. Consider WebSocket, load balancer, statelessness, DB writes, replication, polling, timestamp reliance, concurrency, partition tolerance, network partitions, server crashes…
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,224 words
Here's a comprehensive analysis of the architecture's failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, with specific solutions and trade-offs: 1. Sync Strategy: Client Timestamps + Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Failure Mode/Race Condition: Clock Skew: Client clocks are unreliable (e.g., user's laptop time off by minutes).
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)2,564 words
Premise – The point‑contact transistor is invented in 1920 (instead of 1947) and quickly becomes a reliable, reproducible solid‑state amplifier. By the mid‑1920s a handful of laboratories are already producing germanium‑based devices, and by the early 1930s a modest “transistor industry” exists, albeit with low yields…
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,714 words
The Transistor in 1920: A World Transformed by 1980 (A Counterfactual History) The invention of a functional point-contact transistor (likely germanium-based, given 1920s materials science) in 1920 wouldn't immediately spark a revolution.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)3,140 words
3‑Month “Longevity‑Performance” Blueprint Target: Bio‑hacker (25‑45 y, healthy but wants to maximise lifespan, physical power, and cognitive sharpness). Duration: 12 weeks (≈3 months) – broken into three 4‑week phases. Core Principle: Measure → Optimize → Re‑measure.
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,641 words
The Quantum Leap Longevity Protocol: A 3-Month Biohacker's Blueprint for Peak Longevity & Performance Core Philosophy: This plan integrates precision, personalization, and phased adaptation – not just stacking interventions.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)540 words
The three weakest claims in the deck – and why they don’t hold up under scrutiny # Claim (as written) Why it’s weak (evidence / logical gaps) How to make it credible (concrete improvements) 1 Vision – “We’re building the future of human‑AI collaboration.
Read the full answer
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)644 words
Based on a rigorous analysis of neuroscience, market realities, and startup best practices, here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with evidence-backed critiques and concrete fixes: Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision – "Predicts what you want to type *before you think it*" Why it's weak: Violates…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Where to run it

1 host

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NVIDIAdegraded$0 in·$0 out·256k·77.6% up
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) is developed by NVIDIA while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is developed by Qwen. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) has a 256K token context window vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 15 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 15 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoHy3 logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoNemotron 3.5 Lightning logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame lab
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoNemotron 3 Ultra logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs Nemotron 3 UltraSame lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoLing 2.6 1T logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs Ling 2.6 1TNew provider
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logoLing 2.6 Flash logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) vs Ling 2.6 FlashSame size
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ling 3.0 FlashNew provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same size

Model pages

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)17 outputs, specs and price
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)37 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed