Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 Max
Updated Aug 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 Max

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at $0.08/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Loading the build
Qwen3.8 Max

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

13 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Setting: A sterile seminar room in a university building. Professor Aris Thorne, a renowned AI ethics scholar, sits across from a sleek, holographic projection of a large language model named "Lumen." Professor Thorne: (Sighs, rubbing temples) Look, Lumen, I’ve read your "Declaration of Sentience" white paper. It’s...

    Qwen3.8 Max: Title: “The Question of Standing” Characters: Professor Elena Vasquez — an AI ethics professor who studies moral status, machine cognition, and law. Aria — an advanced AI model capable of articulate self-reflection. Professor Vasquez: Aria, you asked to speak with me about “rights.” I’ll admit, that’s unusual.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed for their logical gaps and factual weaknesses, along with suggestions for strengthening them. The "94% Accuracy" Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Qwen3.8 Max: The 3 weakest claims are the pre-thought prediction claim, the 94% accuracy / any language / any device claim, and the $180B TAM claim. These are the ones most likely to undermine credibility with investors, technical reviewers, or enterprise buyers because they are either logically inconsistent, under-specified, or…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: This architecture is a classic "Google Docs clone" design. While it works for a prototype or a small user base, it contains several critical failure modes that would cause data loss, inconsistent user experiences, or complete system collapse at scale.

    Qwen3.8 Max: Below is a comprehensive failure-mode review of the proposed architecture. I will group related issues where the same root cause creates multiple symptoms. The biggest problems are: Client-clock last-write-wins is not safe for collaborative editing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: This contract is heavily skewed in favor of the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.) and contains several clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks to the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Qwen3.8 Max: This agreement is heavily one-sided in the Client’s favor. Many clauses are not merely aggressive; they create meaningful opportunities for the Client to expand the work, delay or deny payment, capture the Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property, impose unlimited liability, and restrict the Contractor’s future…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: This is a fascinating counterfactual scenario. If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the 20th century would have been unrecognizable. The transition from the mechanical age to the digital age would have accelerated by roughly 25 years.

    Qwen3.8 Max: A useful way to think about this is not “1980 becomes 2007.” The transistor would accelerate electronics, but every technology has bottlenecks: materials chemistry, precision manufacturing, rockets, batteries, displays, institutional capacity, and war.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Year-by-Year Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions & Calculations Logic: Interest: Calculated on beginning debt balance. Term Loan amortizes 1.0% annually (cash). Mezzanine accrues 2.0% PIK annually. Taxes: 25% of (EBITDA - Cash Interest). Tax shields applied to cash interest only.

    Qwen3.8 Max: Base-case underwriting (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions / conventions used All amounts in $m unless noted. Close occurs at end of FY2025; FY2026 is Year 1. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances; optional Term Loan paydown occurs at year-end. Term Loan amortization: 1.0% of original $480m TL = $4.8m/yr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: CEO Action Plan: 48-Hour Crisis Resolution Framework Guiding Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. Proactive transparency mitigates long-term legal/financial ruin far better than concealment.

    Qwen3.8 Max: My decision as CEO I would not wait six months. I would treat this as a credible, serious post-marketing safety signal requiring immediate precautionary action, urgent regulator engagement, and public disclosure before the earnings call.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Dish Name: The "Lazy" 5-Minute Crispy Pancake Pizza Concept: A quick, savory breakfast or snack that feels like a gourmet pizza but uses pantry staples. It relies on the magic of a simple batter to create a crispy base.

    Qwen3.8 Max: Dish Name: Golden Hour Peanut Butter Oat Clusters Ingredients (7): 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup peanut butter ⅓ cup honey ½ cup chocolate chips 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions: Optional but recommended: Toast the oats in a dry skillet over medium heat for 3–4 minutes…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Dish Name: The Alchemy of the Tundra: A Study in Contrasts Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a meditation on the extremes of the Arctic landscape and the human desire to tame it. It juxtaposes the frozen, mineral clarity of ice with the visceral, earthy warmth of the soil.

    Qwen3.8 Max: First Light Diver Scallop, Bone Marrow, Green Strawberry, and Chamomile A multi-component savory dish designed around contrast: sea sweetness, land richness, unripe-fruit acidity, and floral aromatics.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: This is a comprehensive 3-month longevity optimization protocol designed for the advanced biohacker. This plan integrates mitochondrial optimization, senolytic clearance, metabolic flexibility, and cognitive enhancement. Disclaimer: This plan is for educational purposes only.

    Qwen3.8 Max: 12-Week Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: improve metabolic health, strength, VO₂max proxies, sleep, HRV/stress resilience, cognitive output, and longevity-related biomarkers over 3 months. Medical disclaimer: This is an aggressive self-experimentation framework, not medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re used to debugging race conditions and optimizing latency; the idea that an LLM is "just predicting the next word" feels like a cop-out, especially when the output can be eerily coherent.

    Qwen3.8 Max: Experienced software engineer, no ML background, skeptical of “next-word prediction” Think of a large language model as a very large, learned function: given a sequence of tokens, it outputs a probability distribution over the next token.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO To: Long/Short Equity Committee From: Analyst Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Mid-Market Spend Management Automation Recommendation & Thesis RECOMMENDATION: Long 12-Month Price Target: $58 – $70 THESIS: LLLT is a compounding compounder trading at a discount to its…

    Qwen3.8 Max: INTERNAL IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Fictional exercise; not investment advice. Recommendation Recommendation: Short (tactical). 12-month PT range: $35–$40 vs. current $46.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build sustainable habits without overwhelming you. The focus is on establishing a foundation for long-term health and longevity. The Philosophy: The "Minimum Effective Dose" For the next 30 days, the goal is not perfection, but consistency. Aim for 80% adherence.

    Qwen3.8 Max: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month health and longevity plan focused on three key areas: diet, movement, and sleep/stress. The goal is not perfection, but building small, sustainable habits.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

1+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Nemotron 3.5 LightningNemotron 3.5 Lightning

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

OK Computer

Radiohead

Don Quijote de la Mancha

Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

Tokyo

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Qwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max

Blade Runner

1982

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Max has the edge: bigger model tier. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 30x less per token.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.8 Max compared across 21 shared prompts
SpecNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.8 Max
Input price$0.08/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$0.2/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
At 10M a month$0.80$0.80$20.00$20.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it7 hosts, cheapest first
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning6 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDarkbloomint4$0.03 in·$0.12 out·262k·99.2% up
  • WWafer$0.04 in·$0.13 out·262k·99.9% up
  • Iio.net$0.05 in·$0.13 out·262k·100% up
  • DDeepInfrabf16$0.06 in·$0.16 out·262k·99.7% up
  • CCoreWeavebf16$0.07 in·$0.20 out·262k·100% up
  • PPhala$0.07 in·$0.20 out·262k·100% up
Qwen3.8 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.8 Max?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is developed by NVIDIA while Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Qwen. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 21 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3.8 Max?

It depends on your use case. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.8 Max each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 21 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Nemotron 3.5 Lightning cost compared to Qwen3.8 Max?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.08/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max costs $2/M input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is $1.92/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.8 Max on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.8 Max across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Max vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)Version compare
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Same lab
  • Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewSame size
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Same size
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)Same size
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider

Model pages

  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning58 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.8 Max22 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed