OpenAI o3
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
OpenAI o3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare OpenAI o3 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 3 community votes, openai o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 40 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, OpenAI o3 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
OpenAI o3 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between OpenAI o3 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
OpenAI o3 is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 3 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 3 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. OpenAI o3 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Web Design: OpenAI o3 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 are tied
Our Verdict
OpenAI o3Winner
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Pick OpenAI o3. In 3 blind votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 67x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
99%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
OpenAI o3
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
68%Vocabulary56%
14wSentence Length14w
0.26Hedging0.37
0.7Bold5.7
3.0Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.38Headings0.70
0.12Transitions0.14
Based on 16 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
FAQ