OpenAI o3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare OpenAI o3 by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 3 community votes, openai o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: OpenAI o3 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 are tied
Our Verdict
OpenAI o3Winner
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Pick OpenAI o3. In 3 blind votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 67x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
OpenAI o3
Input
$10.00
Output
$40.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
91× cheaper
Output
$0.60
67× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 91× input, 67× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
35%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
OpenAI o3
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
68%Vocabulary56%
14wSentence Length14w
0.26Hedging0.37
0.7Bold5.7
3.0Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.38Headings0.70
0.12Transitions0.14
Based on 16 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
